Cargando…
Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
PURPOSE: To construct a dynamic prediction model for BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation during the early period after renal transplantation and to provide a statistical basis for the identification of and intervention for high-risk populations. METHODS: A retrospective study of 312 first renal allog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971531 |
_version_ | 1784779075348332544 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Yiling Zhang, Chengfeng Wang, Yuchen Yu, Zhiyin Wu, Zhouting Zhou, Yi Yan, Ziyan Luo, Jia Xia, Renfei Zeng, Wenli Deng, Wenfeng Xu, Jian Chen, Zheng Miao, Yun |
author_facet | Fang, Yiling Zhang, Chengfeng Wang, Yuchen Yu, Zhiyin Wu, Zhouting Zhou, Yi Yan, Ziyan Luo, Jia Xia, Renfei Zeng, Wenli Deng, Wenfeng Xu, Jian Chen, Zheng Miao, Yun |
author_sort | Fang, Yiling |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To construct a dynamic prediction model for BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation during the early period after renal transplantation and to provide a statistical basis for the identification of and intervention for high-risk populations. METHODS: A retrospective study of 312 first renal allograft recipients with strictly punctual follow-ups was conducted between January 2015 and March 2022. The covariates were screened using univariable time-dependent Cox regression, and those with P<0.1 were included in the dynamic and static analyses. We constructed a prediction model for BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation using dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method and evaluated its performance using the area under the curve (AUC) value and Brier score. Monte-Carlo cross-validation was done to avoid overfitting. The above evaluation and validation process were repeated in the static model (Cox regression model) to compare the performance. Two patients were presented to illustrate the application of the dynamic model. RESULTS: We constructed a dynamic prediction model with 18 covariates that could predict the probability of BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation. Elder age, basiliximab combined with cyclophosphamide for immune induction, acute graft rejection, higher body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urinary protein level, urinary leukocyte level, and blood neutrophil count were positively correlated with BKV reactivation, whereas male sex, higher serum albumin level, and platelet count served as protective factors. The AUC value and Brier score of the static model were 0.64 and 0.14, respectively, whereas those of the dynamic model were 0.79 ± 0.05 and 0.08 ± 0.01, respectively. In the cross-validation, the AUC values of the static and dynamic models decreased to 0.63 and 0.70 ± 0.03, respectively, whereas the Brier score changed to 0.11 and 0.09 ± 0.01, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method is effective in the assessment of the risk of BKV reactivation in the early period after renal transplantation and serves as a guide for clinical intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9428263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94282632022-09-01 Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation Fang, Yiling Zhang, Chengfeng Wang, Yuchen Yu, Zhiyin Wu, Zhouting Zhou, Yi Yan, Ziyan Luo, Jia Xia, Renfei Zeng, Wenli Deng, Wenfeng Xu, Jian Chen, Zheng Miao, Yun Front Immunol Immunology PURPOSE: To construct a dynamic prediction model for BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation during the early period after renal transplantation and to provide a statistical basis for the identification of and intervention for high-risk populations. METHODS: A retrospective study of 312 first renal allograft recipients with strictly punctual follow-ups was conducted between January 2015 and March 2022. The covariates were screened using univariable time-dependent Cox regression, and those with P<0.1 were included in the dynamic and static analyses. We constructed a prediction model for BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation using dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method and evaluated its performance using the area under the curve (AUC) value and Brier score. Monte-Carlo cross-validation was done to avoid overfitting. The above evaluation and validation process were repeated in the static model (Cox regression model) to compare the performance. Two patients were presented to illustrate the application of the dynamic model. RESULTS: We constructed a dynamic prediction model with 18 covariates that could predict the probability of BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation. Elder age, basiliximab combined with cyclophosphamide for immune induction, acute graft rejection, higher body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urinary protein level, urinary leukocyte level, and blood neutrophil count were positively correlated with BKV reactivation, whereas male sex, higher serum albumin level, and platelet count served as protective factors. The AUC value and Brier score of the static model were 0.64 and 0.14, respectively, whereas those of the dynamic model were 0.79 ± 0.05 and 0.08 ± 0.01, respectively. In the cross-validation, the AUC values of the static and dynamic models decreased to 0.63 and 0.70 ± 0.03, respectively, whereas the Brier score changed to 0.11 and 0.09 ± 0.01, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method is effective in the assessment of the risk of BKV reactivation in the early period after renal transplantation and serves as a guide for clinical intervention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9428263/ /pubmed/36059544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971531 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fang, Zhang, Wang, Yu, Wu, Zhou, Yan, Luo, Xia, Zeng, Deng, Xu, Chen and Miao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Fang, Yiling Zhang, Chengfeng Wang, Yuchen Yu, Zhiyin Wu, Zhouting Zhou, Yi Yan, Ziyan Luo, Jia Xia, Renfei Zeng, Wenli Deng, Wenfeng Xu, Jian Chen, Zheng Miao, Yun Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation |
title | Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation |
title_full | Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation |
title_fullStr | Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation |
title_short | Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation |
title_sort | dynamic risk prediction of bk polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangyiling dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT zhangchengfeng dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT wangyuchen dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT yuzhiyin dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT wuzhouting dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT zhouyi dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT yanziyan dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT luojia dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT xiarenfei dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT zengwenli dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT dengwenfeng dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT xujian dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT chenzheng dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation AT miaoyun dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation |