Cargando…

Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation

PURPOSE: To construct a dynamic prediction model for BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation during the early period after renal transplantation and to provide a statistical basis for the identification of and intervention for high-risk populations. METHODS: A retrospective study of 312 first renal allog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Yiling, Zhang, Chengfeng, Wang, Yuchen, Yu, Zhiyin, Wu, Zhouting, Zhou, Yi, Yan, Ziyan, Luo, Jia, Xia, Renfei, Zeng, Wenli, Deng, Wenfeng, Xu, Jian, Chen, Zheng, Miao, Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059544
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971531
_version_ 1784779075348332544
author Fang, Yiling
Zhang, Chengfeng
Wang, Yuchen
Yu, Zhiyin
Wu, Zhouting
Zhou, Yi
Yan, Ziyan
Luo, Jia
Xia, Renfei
Zeng, Wenli
Deng, Wenfeng
Xu, Jian
Chen, Zheng
Miao, Yun
author_facet Fang, Yiling
Zhang, Chengfeng
Wang, Yuchen
Yu, Zhiyin
Wu, Zhouting
Zhou, Yi
Yan, Ziyan
Luo, Jia
Xia, Renfei
Zeng, Wenli
Deng, Wenfeng
Xu, Jian
Chen, Zheng
Miao, Yun
author_sort Fang, Yiling
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To construct a dynamic prediction model for BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation during the early period after renal transplantation and to provide a statistical basis for the identification of and intervention for high-risk populations. METHODS: A retrospective study of 312 first renal allograft recipients with strictly punctual follow-ups was conducted between January 2015 and March 2022. The covariates were screened using univariable time-dependent Cox regression, and those with P<0.1 were included in the dynamic and static analyses. We constructed a prediction model for BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation using dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method and evaluated its performance using the area under the curve (AUC) value and Brier score. Monte-Carlo cross-validation was done to avoid overfitting. The above evaluation and validation process were repeated in the static model (Cox regression model) to compare the performance. Two patients were presented to illustrate the application of the dynamic model. RESULTS: We constructed a dynamic prediction model with 18 covariates that could predict the probability of BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation. Elder age, basiliximab combined with cyclophosphamide for immune induction, acute graft rejection, higher body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urinary protein level, urinary leukocyte level, and blood neutrophil count were positively correlated with BKV reactivation, whereas male sex, higher serum albumin level, and platelet count served as protective factors. The AUC value and Brier score of the static model were 0.64 and 0.14, respectively, whereas those of the dynamic model were 0.79 ± 0.05 and 0.08 ± 0.01, respectively. In the cross-validation, the AUC values of the static and dynamic models decreased to 0.63 and 0.70 ± 0.03, respectively, whereas the Brier score changed to 0.11 and 0.09 ± 0.01, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method is effective in the assessment of the risk of BKV reactivation in the early period after renal transplantation and serves as a guide for clinical intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9428263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94282632022-09-01 Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation Fang, Yiling Zhang, Chengfeng Wang, Yuchen Yu, Zhiyin Wu, Zhouting Zhou, Yi Yan, Ziyan Luo, Jia Xia, Renfei Zeng, Wenli Deng, Wenfeng Xu, Jian Chen, Zheng Miao, Yun Front Immunol Immunology PURPOSE: To construct a dynamic prediction model for BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation during the early period after renal transplantation and to provide a statistical basis for the identification of and intervention for high-risk populations. METHODS: A retrospective study of 312 first renal allograft recipients with strictly punctual follow-ups was conducted between January 2015 and March 2022. The covariates were screened using univariable time-dependent Cox regression, and those with P<0.1 were included in the dynamic and static analyses. We constructed a prediction model for BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation using dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method and evaluated its performance using the area under the curve (AUC) value and Brier score. Monte-Carlo cross-validation was done to avoid overfitting. The above evaluation and validation process were repeated in the static model (Cox regression model) to compare the performance. Two patients were presented to illustrate the application of the dynamic model. RESULTS: We constructed a dynamic prediction model with 18 covariates that could predict the probability of BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation. Elder age, basiliximab combined with cyclophosphamide for immune induction, acute graft rejection, higher body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urinary protein level, urinary leukocyte level, and blood neutrophil count were positively correlated with BKV reactivation, whereas male sex, higher serum albumin level, and platelet count served as protective factors. The AUC value and Brier score of the static model were 0.64 and 0.14, respectively, whereas those of the dynamic model were 0.79 ± 0.05 and 0.08 ± 0.01, respectively. In the cross-validation, the AUC values of the static and dynamic models decreased to 0.63 and 0.70 ± 0.03, respectively, whereas the Brier score changed to 0.11 and 0.09 ± 0.01, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method is effective in the assessment of the risk of BKV reactivation in the early period after renal transplantation and serves as a guide for clinical intervention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9428263/ /pubmed/36059544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971531 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fang, Zhang, Wang, Yu, Wu, Zhou, Yan, Luo, Xia, Zeng, Deng, Xu, Chen and Miao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Fang, Yiling
Zhang, Chengfeng
Wang, Yuchen
Yu, Zhiyin
Wu, Zhouting
Zhou, Yi
Yan, Ziyan
Luo, Jia
Xia, Renfei
Zeng, Wenli
Deng, Wenfeng
Xu, Jian
Chen, Zheng
Miao, Yun
Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
title Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
title_full Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
title_fullStr Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
title_short Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
title_sort dynamic risk prediction of bk polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059544
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.971531
work_keys_str_mv AT fangyiling dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT zhangchengfeng dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT wangyuchen dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT yuzhiyin dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT wuzhouting dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT zhouyi dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT yanziyan dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT luojia dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT xiarenfei dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT zengwenli dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT dengwenfeng dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT xujian dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT chenzheng dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation
AT miaoyun dynamicriskpredictionofbkpolyomavirusreactivationafterrenaltransplantation