Cargando…
Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) patient reported outcomes (PROs) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), comparing 3D conformal RT (3DCRT) vs. intensity modulated/volumetric modulated arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT). METHODS: An analysis of patients treated with d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35882607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e70 |
_version_ | 1784779084727844864 |
---|---|
author | Urban, Ryan Wong, Justin Lim, Peter Zhang, Susan Spadinger, Ingrid Olson, Robert Bachand, Francois Ho, Clement Tinker, Anna V. Gondara, Lovedeep Hamilton, Sarah Nicole |
author_facet | Urban, Ryan Wong, Justin Lim, Peter Zhang, Susan Spadinger, Ingrid Olson, Robert Bachand, Francois Ho, Clement Tinker, Anna V. Gondara, Lovedeep Hamilton, Sarah Nicole |
author_sort | Urban, Ryan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) patient reported outcomes (PROs) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), comparing 3D conformal RT (3DCRT) vs. intensity modulated/volumetric modulated arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT). METHODS: An analysis of patients treated with definitive RT between 2015–2018 was performed. GI PROs were prospectively collected at baseline, during RT (acute), ≤12 weeks after RT (subacute), and >12 weeks after RT (late). GI PROs evaluated three symptom domains: bowel problems (BPs), bowel bother (BB), and abdominal problems (APs). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between mean changes of symptom scores with clinical and dosimetric variables. RESULTS: The cohort included 167 patients. A total of 100 (60%) patients were treated with IMRT/VMAT and 67 (40%) with 3DCRT. In the subacute phase, the mean change of symptom scores from baseline in 3DCRT vs. IMRT/VMAT were +0.9 vs. −1.15 (p=0.004) for BP, +2.18 vs. −0.10 (p=0.019) for BB, and +1.41 vs. −0.38 (p=0.021) for AP. Likewise, in the late phase, mean changes were +0.72 vs. −0.82 (p=0.014) for BP, +1.98 vs. −0.03 (p=0.008) for BB, and +1.29 vs. −0.31 (p<0.001) for AP. On multiple linear regression, use of 3DCRT vs. IMRT/VMAT was associated with greater mean changes in subacute BP (p=0.023) and late phase AP (p=0.019). A higher small bowel V50Gy was associated increased symptom scores in late AP (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: 3DCRT was associated with significantly greater worsening of GI PRO symptom scores in the subacute and late phase. These data support the ongoing use of IMRT/VMAT in routine practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9428301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94283012022-09-07 Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy Urban, Ryan Wong, Justin Lim, Peter Zhang, Susan Spadinger, Ingrid Olson, Robert Bachand, Francois Ho, Clement Tinker, Anna V. Gondara, Lovedeep Hamilton, Sarah Nicole J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) patient reported outcomes (PROs) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), comparing 3D conformal RT (3DCRT) vs. intensity modulated/volumetric modulated arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT). METHODS: An analysis of patients treated with definitive RT between 2015–2018 was performed. GI PROs were prospectively collected at baseline, during RT (acute), ≤12 weeks after RT (subacute), and >12 weeks after RT (late). GI PROs evaluated three symptom domains: bowel problems (BPs), bowel bother (BB), and abdominal problems (APs). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between mean changes of symptom scores with clinical and dosimetric variables. RESULTS: The cohort included 167 patients. A total of 100 (60%) patients were treated with IMRT/VMAT and 67 (40%) with 3DCRT. In the subacute phase, the mean change of symptom scores from baseline in 3DCRT vs. IMRT/VMAT were +0.9 vs. −1.15 (p=0.004) for BP, +2.18 vs. −0.10 (p=0.019) for BB, and +1.41 vs. −0.38 (p=0.021) for AP. Likewise, in the late phase, mean changes were +0.72 vs. −0.82 (p=0.014) for BP, +1.98 vs. −0.03 (p=0.008) for BB, and +1.29 vs. −0.31 (p<0.001) for AP. On multiple linear regression, use of 3DCRT vs. IMRT/VMAT was associated with greater mean changes in subacute BP (p=0.023) and late phase AP (p=0.019). A higher small bowel V50Gy was associated increased symptom scores in late AP (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: 3DCRT was associated with significantly greater worsening of GI PRO symptom scores in the subacute and late phase. These data support the ongoing use of IMRT/VMAT in routine practice. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9428301/ /pubmed/35882607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e70 Text en © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Urban, Ryan Wong, Justin Lim, Peter Zhang, Susan Spadinger, Ingrid Olson, Robert Bachand, Francois Ho, Clement Tinker, Anna V. Gondara, Lovedeep Hamilton, Sarah Nicole Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy |
title | Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy |
title_full | Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy |
title_short | Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy |
title_sort | cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3d conformal radiation therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35882607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e70 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urbanryan cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT wongjustin cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT limpeter cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT zhangsusan cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT spadingeringrid cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT olsonrobert cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT bachandfrancois cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT hoclement cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT tinkerannav cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT gondaralovedeep cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy AT hamiltonsarahnicole cervicalcancerpatientreportedgastrointestinaloutcomesintensityvolumetricmodulatedvs3dconformalradiationtherapy |