Cargando…
Comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) is a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Recently, the cusp-overlap projection (COP) technique was thought to be a feasible method to reduce PPI risk. However, the evidence is still relatively scarce. Therefore, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.927642 |
_version_ | 1784779121731043328 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yujing Zhu, Gangjie Liu, Xin Wu, Weilin Chai, Hui Tao, Minjie Kong, Dongmei Li, Yingzi Wang, Li |
author_facet | Chen, Yujing Zhu, Gangjie Liu, Xin Wu, Weilin Chai, Hui Tao, Minjie Kong, Dongmei Li, Yingzi Wang, Li |
author_sort | Chen, Yujing |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) is a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Recently, the cusp-overlap projection (COP) technique was thought to be a feasible method to reduce PPI risk. However, the evidence is still relatively scarce. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to compare COP and standard three-cusp coplanar (TCC) projection technique. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for relevant literature published from the inception (EMBASE from 1974 and PubMed from 1966) to 16 April 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome of interest was post-operative (including in-hospital and 30-day) PPI. RESULTS: Total of 3,647 subjects from 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Of those, 1,453 underwent self-expanding TAVR using COP and 2,194 using TCC technique. In a pooled analysis, the cumulative PPI incidence was 9.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9–11.7%] and 18.9% (95% CI: 15.5–22.3%) in the COP group and TCC group, respectively. The application of the COP technique was associated with a significant PPI risk reduction (I(2) = 40.3% and heterogeneity Chi-square p = 0.070, random-effects OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36–0.66, p < 0.001). A higher implantation depth was achieved in the COP group compared with the TCC group [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.324, 95% CI: (−0.469, −0.180)]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in second valve implantation, prosthesis pop-out, fluoroscopic time, post-operative left bundle branch block, mortality, stroke, moderate/severe paravalvular leakage, mean gradient, and length of hospital stay. However, radiation doses were higher in the COP group [SMD = 0.394, 95% CI: (0.216, 0.572), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In self-expanding TAVR, the application of the cusp overlap projection technique was associated with a lower risk of PPI compared with the standard TCC technique. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-4-0092/], identifier [INPLASY202240092]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9428452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94284522022-09-01 Comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Yujing Zhu, Gangjie Liu, Xin Wu, Weilin Chai, Hui Tao, Minjie Kong, Dongmei Li, Yingzi Wang, Li Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) is a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Recently, the cusp-overlap projection (COP) technique was thought to be a feasible method to reduce PPI risk. However, the evidence is still relatively scarce. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to compare COP and standard three-cusp coplanar (TCC) projection technique. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for relevant literature published from the inception (EMBASE from 1974 and PubMed from 1966) to 16 April 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome of interest was post-operative (including in-hospital and 30-day) PPI. RESULTS: Total of 3,647 subjects from 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Of those, 1,453 underwent self-expanding TAVR using COP and 2,194 using TCC technique. In a pooled analysis, the cumulative PPI incidence was 9.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9–11.7%] and 18.9% (95% CI: 15.5–22.3%) in the COP group and TCC group, respectively. The application of the COP technique was associated with a significant PPI risk reduction (I(2) = 40.3% and heterogeneity Chi-square p = 0.070, random-effects OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36–0.66, p < 0.001). A higher implantation depth was achieved in the COP group compared with the TCC group [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.324, 95% CI: (−0.469, −0.180)]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in second valve implantation, prosthesis pop-out, fluoroscopic time, post-operative left bundle branch block, mortality, stroke, moderate/severe paravalvular leakage, mean gradient, and length of hospital stay. However, radiation doses were higher in the COP group [SMD = 0.394, 95% CI: (0.216, 0.572), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In self-expanding TAVR, the application of the cusp overlap projection technique was associated with a lower risk of PPI compared with the standard TCC technique. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-4-0092/], identifier [INPLASY202240092]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9428452/ /pubmed/36061562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.927642 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Zhu, Liu, Wu, Chai, Tao, Kong, Li and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Chen, Yujing Zhu, Gangjie Liu, Xin Wu, Weilin Chai, Hui Tao, Minjie Kong, Dongmei Li, Yingzi Wang, Li Comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of cusp-overlap projection and standard three-cusp coplanar view during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.927642 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyujing comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhugangjie comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuxin comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuweilin comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chaihui comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taominjie comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kongdongmei comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liyingzi comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangli comparisonofcuspoverlapprojectionandstandardthreecuspcoplanarviewduringselfexpandingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |