Cargando…
Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system
Much like human consumers, honeybees adjust their behaviours based on resources' supply and demand. For both, interactions occur in fluctuating conditions. Honeybees weigh the cost of flight against the benefit of nectar and pollen, which are nutritionally distinct resources that serve differen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36043303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0155 |
_version_ | 1784779141295374336 |
---|---|
author | Ohlinger, Bradley D. Schürch, Roger Silliman, Mary R. Steele, Taylor N. Couvillon, Margaret J. |
author_facet | Ohlinger, Bradley D. Schürch, Roger Silliman, Mary R. Steele, Taylor N. Couvillon, Margaret J. |
author_sort | Ohlinger, Bradley D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Much like human consumers, honeybees adjust their behaviours based on resources' supply and demand. For both, interactions occur in fluctuating conditions. Honeybees weigh the cost of flight against the benefit of nectar and pollen, which are nutritionally distinct resources that serve different purposes: bees collect nectar continuously to build large honey stores for overwintering, but they collect pollen intermittently to build modest stores for brood production periods. Therefore, nectar foraging can be considered a supply-driven process, whereas pollen foraging is demand-driven. Here we compared the foraging distances, communicated by waggle dances and serving as a proxy for cost, for nectar and pollen in three ecologically distinct landscapes in Virginia. We found that honeybees foraged for nectar at distances 14% further than for pollen across all three sites (n = 6224 dances, p < 0.001). Specific temporal dynamics reveal that monthly nectar foraging occurs at greater distances compared with pollen foraging 85% of the time. Our results strongly suggest that honeybee foraging cost dynamics are consistent with nectar supply-driven and pollen demand-driven processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9428537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94285372022-09-01 Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system Ohlinger, Bradley D. Schürch, Roger Silliman, Mary R. Steele, Taylor N. Couvillon, Margaret J. Biol Lett Animal Behaviour Much like human consumers, honeybees adjust their behaviours based on resources' supply and demand. For both, interactions occur in fluctuating conditions. Honeybees weigh the cost of flight against the benefit of nectar and pollen, which are nutritionally distinct resources that serve different purposes: bees collect nectar continuously to build large honey stores for overwintering, but they collect pollen intermittently to build modest stores for brood production periods. Therefore, nectar foraging can be considered a supply-driven process, whereas pollen foraging is demand-driven. Here we compared the foraging distances, communicated by waggle dances and serving as a proxy for cost, for nectar and pollen in three ecologically distinct landscapes in Virginia. We found that honeybees foraged for nectar at distances 14% further than for pollen across all three sites (n = 6224 dances, p < 0.001). Specific temporal dynamics reveal that monthly nectar foraging occurs at greater distances compared with pollen foraging 85% of the time. Our results strongly suggest that honeybee foraging cost dynamics are consistent with nectar supply-driven and pollen demand-driven processes. The Royal Society 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9428537/ /pubmed/36043303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0155 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behaviour Ohlinger, Bradley D. Schürch, Roger Silliman, Mary R. Steele, Taylor N. Couvillon, Margaret J. Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system |
title | Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system |
title_full | Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system |
title_fullStr | Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system |
title_full_unstemmed | Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system |
title_short | Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system |
title_sort | dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system |
topic | Animal Behaviour |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36043303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohlingerbradleyd dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem AT schurchroger dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem AT sillimanmaryr dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem AT steeletaylorn dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem AT couvillonmargaretj dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem |