Cargando…

Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system

Much like human consumers, honeybees adjust their behaviours based on resources' supply and demand. For both, interactions occur in fluctuating conditions. Honeybees weigh the cost of flight against the benefit of nectar and pollen, which are nutritionally distinct resources that serve differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohlinger, Bradley D., Schürch, Roger, Silliman, Mary R., Steele, Taylor N., Couvillon, Margaret J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36043303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0155
_version_ 1784779141295374336
author Ohlinger, Bradley D.
Schürch, Roger
Silliman, Mary R.
Steele, Taylor N.
Couvillon, Margaret J.
author_facet Ohlinger, Bradley D.
Schürch, Roger
Silliman, Mary R.
Steele, Taylor N.
Couvillon, Margaret J.
author_sort Ohlinger, Bradley D.
collection PubMed
description Much like human consumers, honeybees adjust their behaviours based on resources' supply and demand. For both, interactions occur in fluctuating conditions. Honeybees weigh the cost of flight against the benefit of nectar and pollen, which are nutritionally distinct resources that serve different purposes: bees collect nectar continuously to build large honey stores for overwintering, but they collect pollen intermittently to build modest stores for brood production periods. Therefore, nectar foraging can be considered a supply-driven process, whereas pollen foraging is demand-driven. Here we compared the foraging distances, communicated by waggle dances and serving as a proxy for cost, for nectar and pollen in three ecologically distinct landscapes in Virginia. We found that honeybees foraged for nectar at distances 14% further than for pollen across all three sites (n = 6224 dances, p < 0.001). Specific temporal dynamics reveal that monthly nectar foraging occurs at greater distances compared with pollen foraging 85% of the time. Our results strongly suggest that honeybee foraging cost dynamics are consistent with nectar supply-driven and pollen demand-driven processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9428537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94285372022-09-01 Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system Ohlinger, Bradley D. Schürch, Roger Silliman, Mary R. Steele, Taylor N. Couvillon, Margaret J. Biol Lett Animal Behaviour Much like human consumers, honeybees adjust their behaviours based on resources' supply and demand. For both, interactions occur in fluctuating conditions. Honeybees weigh the cost of flight against the benefit of nectar and pollen, which are nutritionally distinct resources that serve different purposes: bees collect nectar continuously to build large honey stores for overwintering, but they collect pollen intermittently to build modest stores for brood production periods. Therefore, nectar foraging can be considered a supply-driven process, whereas pollen foraging is demand-driven. Here we compared the foraging distances, communicated by waggle dances and serving as a proxy for cost, for nectar and pollen in three ecologically distinct landscapes in Virginia. We found that honeybees foraged for nectar at distances 14% further than for pollen across all three sites (n = 6224 dances, p < 0.001). Specific temporal dynamics reveal that monthly nectar foraging occurs at greater distances compared with pollen foraging 85% of the time. Our results strongly suggest that honeybee foraging cost dynamics are consistent with nectar supply-driven and pollen demand-driven processes. The Royal Society 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9428537/ /pubmed/36043303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0155 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Animal Behaviour
Ohlinger, Bradley D.
Schürch, Roger
Silliman, Mary R.
Steele, Taylor N.
Couvillon, Margaret J.
Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system
title Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system
title_full Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system
title_fullStr Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system
title_full_unstemmed Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system
title_short Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system
title_sort dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system
topic Animal Behaviour
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36043303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0155
work_keys_str_mv AT ohlingerbradleyd dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem
AT schurchroger dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem
AT sillimanmaryr dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem
AT steeletaylorn dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem
AT couvillonmargaretj dancecommunicateddistancessupportnectarforagingasasupplydrivensystem