Cargando…

Under or Absent Reporting of Light Stimuli in Testing of Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Rodents: The Need for Standardization

Behavioral neuroscience tests such as the Light/Dark Test, the Open Field Test, the Elevated Plus Maze Test, and the Three Chamber Social Interaction Test have become both essential and widely used behavioral tests for transgenic and pre-clinical models for drug screening and testing. However, as fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neuwirth, Lorenz S., Verrengia, Michael T., Harikinish-Murrary, Zachary I., Orens, Jessica E., Lopez, Oscar E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061362
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.912146
_version_ 1784779147848974336
author Neuwirth, Lorenz S.
Verrengia, Michael T.
Harikinish-Murrary, Zachary I.
Orens, Jessica E.
Lopez, Oscar E.
author_facet Neuwirth, Lorenz S.
Verrengia, Michael T.
Harikinish-Murrary, Zachary I.
Orens, Jessica E.
Lopez, Oscar E.
author_sort Neuwirth, Lorenz S.
collection PubMed
description Behavioral neuroscience tests such as the Light/Dark Test, the Open Field Test, the Elevated Plus Maze Test, and the Three Chamber Social Interaction Test have become both essential and widely used behavioral tests for transgenic and pre-clinical models for drug screening and testing. However, as fast as the field has evolved and the contemporaneous involvement of technology, little assessment of the literature has been done to ensure that these behavioral neuroscience tests that are crucial to pre-clinical testing have well-controlled ethological motivation by the use of lighting (i.e., Lux). In the present review paper, N = 420 manuscripts were examined from 2015 to 2019 as a sample set (i.e., n = ~20–22 publications per year) and it was found that only a meager n = 50 publications (i.e., 11.9% of the publications sampled) met the criteria for proper anxiogenic and anxiolytic Lux reported. These findings illustrate a serious concern that behavioral neuroscience papers are not being vetted properly at the journal review level and are being released into the literature and public domain making it difficult to assess the quality of the science being reported. This creates a real need for standardizing the use of Lux in all publications on behavioral neuroscience techniques within the field to ensure that contributions are meaningful, avoid unnecessary duplication, and ultimately would serve to create a more efficient process within the pre-clinical screening/testing for drugs that serve as anxiolytic compounds that would prove more useful than what prior decades of work have produced. It is suggested that improving the standardization of the use and reporting of Lux in behavioral neuroscience tests and the standardization of peer-review processes overseeing the proper documentation of these methodological approaches in manuscripts could serve to advance pre-clinical testing for effective anxiolytic drugs. This report serves to highlight this concern and proposes strategies to proactively remedy them as the field moves forward for decades to come.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9428565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94285652022-09-01 Under or Absent Reporting of Light Stimuli in Testing of Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Rodents: The Need for Standardization Neuwirth, Lorenz S. Verrengia, Michael T. Harikinish-Murrary, Zachary I. Orens, Jessica E. Lopez, Oscar E. Front Mol Neurosci Molecular Neuroscience Behavioral neuroscience tests such as the Light/Dark Test, the Open Field Test, the Elevated Plus Maze Test, and the Three Chamber Social Interaction Test have become both essential and widely used behavioral tests for transgenic and pre-clinical models for drug screening and testing. However, as fast as the field has evolved and the contemporaneous involvement of technology, little assessment of the literature has been done to ensure that these behavioral neuroscience tests that are crucial to pre-clinical testing have well-controlled ethological motivation by the use of lighting (i.e., Lux). In the present review paper, N = 420 manuscripts were examined from 2015 to 2019 as a sample set (i.e., n = ~20–22 publications per year) and it was found that only a meager n = 50 publications (i.e., 11.9% of the publications sampled) met the criteria for proper anxiogenic and anxiolytic Lux reported. These findings illustrate a serious concern that behavioral neuroscience papers are not being vetted properly at the journal review level and are being released into the literature and public domain making it difficult to assess the quality of the science being reported. This creates a real need for standardizing the use of Lux in all publications on behavioral neuroscience techniques within the field to ensure that contributions are meaningful, avoid unnecessary duplication, and ultimately would serve to create a more efficient process within the pre-clinical screening/testing for drugs that serve as anxiolytic compounds that would prove more useful than what prior decades of work have produced. It is suggested that improving the standardization of the use and reporting of Lux in behavioral neuroscience tests and the standardization of peer-review processes overseeing the proper documentation of these methodological approaches in manuscripts could serve to advance pre-clinical testing for effective anxiolytic drugs. This report serves to highlight this concern and proposes strategies to proactively remedy them as the field moves forward for decades to come. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9428565/ /pubmed/36061362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.912146 Text en Copyright © 2022 Neuwirth, Verrengia, Harikinish-Murrary, Orens and Lopez. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Molecular Neuroscience
Neuwirth, Lorenz S.
Verrengia, Michael T.
Harikinish-Murrary, Zachary I.
Orens, Jessica E.
Lopez, Oscar E.
Under or Absent Reporting of Light Stimuli in Testing of Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Rodents: The Need for Standardization
title Under or Absent Reporting of Light Stimuli in Testing of Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Rodents: The Need for Standardization
title_full Under or Absent Reporting of Light Stimuli in Testing of Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Rodents: The Need for Standardization
title_fullStr Under or Absent Reporting of Light Stimuli in Testing of Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Rodents: The Need for Standardization
title_full_unstemmed Under or Absent Reporting of Light Stimuli in Testing of Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Rodents: The Need for Standardization
title_short Under or Absent Reporting of Light Stimuli in Testing of Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Rodents: The Need for Standardization
title_sort under or absent reporting of light stimuli in testing of anxiety-like behaviors in rodents: the need for standardization
topic Molecular Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061362
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.912146
work_keys_str_mv AT neuwirthlorenzs underorabsentreportingoflightstimuliintestingofanxietylikebehaviorsinrodentstheneedforstandardization
AT verrengiamichaelt underorabsentreportingoflightstimuliintestingofanxietylikebehaviorsinrodentstheneedforstandardization
AT harikinishmurraryzacharyi underorabsentreportingoflightstimuliintestingofanxietylikebehaviorsinrodentstheneedforstandardization
AT orensjessicae underorabsentreportingoflightstimuliintestingofanxietylikebehaviorsinrodentstheneedforstandardization
AT lopezoscare underorabsentreportingoflightstimuliintestingofanxietylikebehaviorsinrodentstheneedforstandardization