Cargando…
Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the incidence of bifid pancreatic duct (BPD) in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and clarify its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). BACKGROUND: Until now, all the literature about BPD during PD are published as case reports,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934978 |
_version_ | 1784779160125702144 |
---|---|
author | Ouyang, Liu Hu, Hao Nie, Gang Yang, Li-xue Huang, Zhi-ping Ni, Chen-ming Shao, Zhuo Zheng, Kai-lian Jing, Wei Song, Bin Li, Gang Hu, Xian-gui Jin, Gang |
author_facet | Ouyang, Liu Hu, Hao Nie, Gang Yang, Li-xue Huang, Zhi-ping Ni, Chen-ming Shao, Zhuo Zheng, Kai-lian Jing, Wei Song, Bin Li, Gang Hu, Xian-gui Jin, Gang |
author_sort | Ouyang, Liu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the incidence of bifid pancreatic duct (BPD) in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and clarify its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). BACKGROUND: Until now, all the literature about BPD during PD are published as case reports, and the incidence of BPD in PD and its impact on CR-POPF remain unknown. RESULTS: A total of 438 consecutive PDs were divided into two groups: the former year group and the latter year group. The former year group included 215 consecutive PDs, while the latter year group included 223. In the latter year group, we found 16 BPDs during PD (O-BPD); the incidence of O-BPD is 7.17%. Of them, there were eight patients who had BPD in the preoperative imaging (I-BPD). All the I-BPDs are O-BPDs; which means that 50% of O-BPDs were a single pancreatic duct in the preoperative imaging (I-SPD). There were 17 I-BPDs in the 438 consecutive PDs; the incidence of I-BPD is 3.88%. In the former year group, the rate of severe complications of I-BPD and I-SPD is 77.78% and 27.18%, respectively (p = 0.003); the rate of CR-POPF of I-BPD is higher than I-SPD, 55.56% vs. 27.18%, but there were no statistically significant differences. In the latter year group, the rate of severe complications of O-BPD and O-SPD is 50% and 18.36%, and the rate of CR-POPF of O-BPD and O-SPD is 37.5% and 22.22%, respectively; both of them have statistically significant differences, and the p-value is 0.003 and 0.006, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, both the rate of severe complications and the rate of CR-POPF of I-BPD were higher than O-BPD, 77.78% vs. 50%, and 55.56% vs. 37.5%, but there were no statistically significant differences in both of them; the p-value is 0.174 and 0.434, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that BPD was an independent risk factor of CR-POPF. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of O-BPD in PD is 7.17%, 50% of O-BPDs were I-SPD, and the incidence of I-BPD is 3.88%. BPD is an independent risk factor of CR-POPF. The suture closure method may be a simple, safe, and effective method in dealing with BPD in PD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9428626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94286262022-09-01 Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula Ouyang, Liu Hu, Hao Nie, Gang Yang, Li-xue Huang, Zhi-ping Ni, Chen-ming Shao, Zhuo Zheng, Kai-lian Jing, Wei Song, Bin Li, Gang Hu, Xian-gui Jin, Gang Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the incidence of bifid pancreatic duct (BPD) in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and clarify its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). BACKGROUND: Until now, all the literature about BPD during PD are published as case reports, and the incidence of BPD in PD and its impact on CR-POPF remain unknown. RESULTS: A total of 438 consecutive PDs were divided into two groups: the former year group and the latter year group. The former year group included 215 consecutive PDs, while the latter year group included 223. In the latter year group, we found 16 BPDs during PD (O-BPD); the incidence of O-BPD is 7.17%. Of them, there were eight patients who had BPD in the preoperative imaging (I-BPD). All the I-BPDs are O-BPDs; which means that 50% of O-BPDs were a single pancreatic duct in the preoperative imaging (I-SPD). There were 17 I-BPDs in the 438 consecutive PDs; the incidence of I-BPD is 3.88%. In the former year group, the rate of severe complications of I-BPD and I-SPD is 77.78% and 27.18%, respectively (p = 0.003); the rate of CR-POPF of I-BPD is higher than I-SPD, 55.56% vs. 27.18%, but there were no statistically significant differences. In the latter year group, the rate of severe complications of O-BPD and O-SPD is 50% and 18.36%, and the rate of CR-POPF of O-BPD and O-SPD is 37.5% and 22.22%, respectively; both of them have statistically significant differences, and the p-value is 0.003 and 0.006, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, both the rate of severe complications and the rate of CR-POPF of I-BPD were higher than O-BPD, 77.78% vs. 50%, and 55.56% vs. 37.5%, but there were no statistically significant differences in both of them; the p-value is 0.174 and 0.434, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that BPD was an independent risk factor of CR-POPF. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of O-BPD in PD is 7.17%, 50% of O-BPDs were I-SPD, and the incidence of I-BPD is 3.88%. BPD is an independent risk factor of CR-POPF. The suture closure method may be a simple, safe, and effective method in dealing with BPD in PD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9428626/ /pubmed/36059692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934978 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ouyang, Hu, Nie, Yang, Huang, Ni, Shao, Zheng, Jing, Song, Li, Hu and Jin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Ouyang, Liu Hu, Hao Nie, Gang Yang, Li-xue Huang, Zhi-ping Ni, Chen-ming Shao, Zhuo Zheng, Kai-lian Jing, Wei Song, Bin Li, Gang Hu, Xian-gui Jin, Gang Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula |
title | Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula |
title_full | Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula |
title_fullStr | Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula |
title_short | Incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula |
title_sort | incidence of bifid pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouyangliu incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT huhao incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT niegang incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT yanglixue incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT huangzhiping incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT nichenming incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT shaozhuo incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT zhengkailian incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT jingwei incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT songbin incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT ligang incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT huxiangui incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula AT jingang incidenceofbifidpancreaticductinpancreaticoduodenectomyanditsimpactonclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistula |