Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Both anlotinib and programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade have been approved for the second-line treatment of metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the combination of these two therapies has not been evaluated. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of anlot...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.942678 |
_version_ | 1784779178360438784 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Ying Ge, Qingqing Xu, Shuning Li, Ke Liu, Ying |
author_facet | Liu, Ying Ge, Qingqing Xu, Shuning Li, Ke Liu, Ying |
author_sort | Liu, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both anlotinib and programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade have been approved for the second-line treatment of metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the combination of these two therapies has not been evaluated. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting tumor angiogenesis, combined with PD-1 blockade as second or further-line treatment for advanced ESCC. METHODS: Between January 2019 and February 2021, 98 advanced ESCC patients receiving anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade or anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment at Henan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade were grouped as cohort A (n=48), while those receiving anlotinib monotherapy were grouped as cohort B (n=50). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and toxicity. Furthermore, independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Data was collected until May 1, 2021, with a median follow-up time of 9.30 months (8.23–10.37 months) in cohort A and11.10months (7.82–14.38 months) in cohort B. For patients with advanced ESCC, cohort A resulted in significantly longer PFS (5.40 vs. 3.00 months, P<0.001) and higher DCR (71.7% vs. 47.9%, P=0.019) than cohort B. The ORR indicated no significant difference between cohort A (23.9%) and cohort B (10.4%) (P=0.082). Adverse reactions were mainly grade1/2 in the two groups. Compared with cohort B, a significantly higher rate of grade 1–2 hypothyroidism was observed in patients in cohort A (P= 0.034). Three patients (6.3%) developed grade 1/2 immune-related pneumonia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the drug regimen (P<0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (P=0.002), distant organ metastasis (P=0.008), and metastatic sites (P=0.032) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade showed promising anti-tumor activity and manageable toxicity as second or further-line treatment of advanced ESCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9428701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94287012022-09-01 Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study Liu, Ying Ge, Qingqing Xu, Shuning Li, Ke Liu, Ying Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Both anlotinib and programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade have been approved for the second-line treatment of metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the combination of these two therapies has not been evaluated. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting tumor angiogenesis, combined with PD-1 blockade as second or further-line treatment for advanced ESCC. METHODS: Between January 2019 and February 2021, 98 advanced ESCC patients receiving anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade or anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment at Henan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade were grouped as cohort A (n=48), while those receiving anlotinib monotherapy were grouped as cohort B (n=50). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and toxicity. Furthermore, independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Data was collected until May 1, 2021, with a median follow-up time of 9.30 months (8.23–10.37 months) in cohort A and11.10months (7.82–14.38 months) in cohort B. For patients with advanced ESCC, cohort A resulted in significantly longer PFS (5.40 vs. 3.00 months, P<0.001) and higher DCR (71.7% vs. 47.9%, P=0.019) than cohort B. The ORR indicated no significant difference between cohort A (23.9%) and cohort B (10.4%) (P=0.082). Adverse reactions were mainly grade1/2 in the two groups. Compared with cohort B, a significantly higher rate of grade 1–2 hypothyroidism was observed in patients in cohort A (P= 0.034). Three patients (6.3%) developed grade 1/2 immune-related pneumonia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the drug regimen (P<0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (P=0.002), distant organ metastasis (P=0.008), and metastatic sites (P=0.032) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade showed promising anti-tumor activity and manageable toxicity as second or further-line treatment of advanced ESCC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9428701/ /pubmed/36059654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.942678 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Ge, Xu, Li and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Liu, Ying Ge, Qingqing Xu, Shuning Li, Ke Liu, Ying Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title | Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.942678 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuying efficacyandsafetyofanlotinibplusprogrammeddeath1blockadeversusanlotinibmonotherapyassecondorfurtherlinetreatmentinadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT geqingqing efficacyandsafetyofanlotinibplusprogrammeddeath1blockadeversusanlotinibmonotherapyassecondorfurtherlinetreatmentinadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT xushuning efficacyandsafetyofanlotinibplusprogrammeddeath1blockadeversusanlotinibmonotherapyassecondorfurtherlinetreatmentinadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT like efficacyandsafetyofanlotinibplusprogrammeddeath1blockadeversusanlotinibmonotherapyassecondorfurtherlinetreatmentinadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT liuying efficacyandsafetyofanlotinibplusprogrammeddeath1blockadeversusanlotinibmonotherapyassecondorfurtherlinetreatmentinadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy |