Cargando…

Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders

Burkholderia pseudomallei and the closely related species, Burkholderia mallei, produce similar multifaceted diseases which range from rapidly fatal to protracted and chronic, and are a major cause of mortality in endemic regions. Besides causing natural infections, both microbes are Tier 1 potentia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biryukov, Sergei S., Cote, Christopher K., Klimko, Christopher P., Dankmeyer, Jennifer L., Rill, Nathaniel O., Shoe, Jennifer L., Hunter, Melissa, Shamsuddin, Zain, Velez, Ivan, Hedrick, Zander M., Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa, Talyansky, Yuli, Schmidt, Lindsey K., Orne, Caitlyn E., Fetterer, David P., Burtnick, Mary N., Brett, Paul J., Welkos, Susan L., DeShazer, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.965518
_version_ 1784779184045817856
author Biryukov, Sergei S.
Cote, Christopher K.
Klimko, Christopher P.
Dankmeyer, Jennifer L.
Rill, Nathaniel O.
Shoe, Jennifer L.
Hunter, Melissa
Shamsuddin, Zain
Velez, Ivan
Hedrick, Zander M.
Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa
Talyansky, Yuli
Schmidt, Lindsey K.
Orne, Caitlyn E.
Fetterer, David P.
Burtnick, Mary N.
Brett, Paul J.
Welkos, Susan L.
DeShazer, David
author_facet Biryukov, Sergei S.
Cote, Christopher K.
Klimko, Christopher P.
Dankmeyer, Jennifer L.
Rill, Nathaniel O.
Shoe, Jennifer L.
Hunter, Melissa
Shamsuddin, Zain
Velez, Ivan
Hedrick, Zander M.
Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa
Talyansky, Yuli
Schmidt, Lindsey K.
Orne, Caitlyn E.
Fetterer, David P.
Burtnick, Mary N.
Brett, Paul J.
Welkos, Susan L.
DeShazer, David
author_sort Biryukov, Sergei S.
collection PubMed
description Burkholderia pseudomallei and the closely related species, Burkholderia mallei, produce similar multifaceted diseases which range from rapidly fatal to protracted and chronic, and are a major cause of mortality in endemic regions. Besides causing natural infections, both microbes are Tier 1 potential biothreat agents. Antibiotic treatment is prolonged with variable results, hence effective vaccines are urgently needed. The purpose of our studies was to compare candidate vaccines that target both melioidosis and glanders to identify the most efficacious one(s) and define residual requirements for their transition to the non-human primate aerosol model. Studies were conducted in the C57BL/6 mouse model to evaluate the humoral and cell-mediated immune response and protective efficacy of three Burkholderia vaccine candidates against lethal aerosol challenges with B. pseudomallei K96243, B. pseudomallei MSHR5855, and B. mallei FMH. The recombinant vaccines generated significant immune responses to the vaccine antigens, and the live attenuated vaccine generated a greater immune response to OPS and the whole bacterial cells. Regardless of the candidate vaccine evaluated, the protection of mice was associated with a dampened cytokine response within the lungs after exposure to aerosolized bacteria. Despite being delivered by two different platforms and generating distinct immune responses, two experimental vaccines, a capsule conjugate + Hcp1 subunit vaccine and the live B. pseudomallei 668 ΔilvI strain, provided significant protection and were down-selected for further investigation and advanced development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9428723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94287232022-09-01 Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders Biryukov, Sergei S. Cote, Christopher K. Klimko, Christopher P. Dankmeyer, Jennifer L. Rill, Nathaniel O. Shoe, Jennifer L. Hunter, Melissa Shamsuddin, Zain Velez, Ivan Hedrick, Zander M. Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa Talyansky, Yuli Schmidt, Lindsey K. Orne, Caitlyn E. Fetterer, David P. Burtnick, Mary N. Brett, Paul J. Welkos, Susan L. DeShazer, David Front Microbiol Microbiology Burkholderia pseudomallei and the closely related species, Burkholderia mallei, produce similar multifaceted diseases which range from rapidly fatal to protracted and chronic, and are a major cause of mortality in endemic regions. Besides causing natural infections, both microbes are Tier 1 potential biothreat agents. Antibiotic treatment is prolonged with variable results, hence effective vaccines are urgently needed. The purpose of our studies was to compare candidate vaccines that target both melioidosis and glanders to identify the most efficacious one(s) and define residual requirements for their transition to the non-human primate aerosol model. Studies were conducted in the C57BL/6 mouse model to evaluate the humoral and cell-mediated immune response and protective efficacy of three Burkholderia vaccine candidates against lethal aerosol challenges with B. pseudomallei K96243, B. pseudomallei MSHR5855, and B. mallei FMH. The recombinant vaccines generated significant immune responses to the vaccine antigens, and the live attenuated vaccine generated a greater immune response to OPS and the whole bacterial cells. Regardless of the candidate vaccine evaluated, the protection of mice was associated with a dampened cytokine response within the lungs after exposure to aerosolized bacteria. Despite being delivered by two different platforms and generating distinct immune responses, two experimental vaccines, a capsule conjugate + Hcp1 subunit vaccine and the live B. pseudomallei 668 ΔilvI strain, provided significant protection and were down-selected for further investigation and advanced development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9428723/ /pubmed/36060742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.965518 Text en Copyright © 2022 Biryukov, Cote, Klimko, Dankmeyer, Rill, Shoe, Hunter, Shamsuddin, Velez, Hedrick, Rosario-Acevedo, Talyansky, Schmidt, Orne, Fetterer, Burtnick, Brett, Welkos and DeShazer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Biryukov, Sergei S.
Cote, Christopher K.
Klimko, Christopher P.
Dankmeyer, Jennifer L.
Rill, Nathaniel O.
Shoe, Jennifer L.
Hunter, Melissa
Shamsuddin, Zain
Velez, Ivan
Hedrick, Zander M.
Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa
Talyansky, Yuli
Schmidt, Lindsey K.
Orne, Caitlyn E.
Fetterer, David P.
Burtnick, Mary N.
Brett, Paul J.
Welkos, Susan L.
DeShazer, David
Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders
title Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders
title_full Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders
title_fullStr Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders
title_short Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders
title_sort evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.965518
work_keys_str_mv AT biryukovsergeis evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT cotechristopherk evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT klimkochristopherp evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT dankmeyerjenniferl evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT rillnathanielo evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT shoejenniferl evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT huntermelissa evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT shamsuddinzain evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT velezivan evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT hedrickzanderm evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT rosarioacevedoraysa evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT talyanskyyuli evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT schmidtlindseyk evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT ornecaitlyne evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT fettererdavidp evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT burtnickmaryn evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT brettpaulj evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT welkossusanl evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders
AT deshazerdavid evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders