Cargando…
Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders
Burkholderia pseudomallei and the closely related species, Burkholderia mallei, produce similar multifaceted diseases which range from rapidly fatal to protracted and chronic, and are a major cause of mortality in endemic regions. Besides causing natural infections, both microbes are Tier 1 potentia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.965518 |
_version_ | 1784779184045817856 |
---|---|
author | Biryukov, Sergei S. Cote, Christopher K. Klimko, Christopher P. Dankmeyer, Jennifer L. Rill, Nathaniel O. Shoe, Jennifer L. Hunter, Melissa Shamsuddin, Zain Velez, Ivan Hedrick, Zander M. Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa Talyansky, Yuli Schmidt, Lindsey K. Orne, Caitlyn E. Fetterer, David P. Burtnick, Mary N. Brett, Paul J. Welkos, Susan L. DeShazer, David |
author_facet | Biryukov, Sergei S. Cote, Christopher K. Klimko, Christopher P. Dankmeyer, Jennifer L. Rill, Nathaniel O. Shoe, Jennifer L. Hunter, Melissa Shamsuddin, Zain Velez, Ivan Hedrick, Zander M. Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa Talyansky, Yuli Schmidt, Lindsey K. Orne, Caitlyn E. Fetterer, David P. Burtnick, Mary N. Brett, Paul J. Welkos, Susan L. DeShazer, David |
author_sort | Biryukov, Sergei S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Burkholderia pseudomallei and the closely related species, Burkholderia mallei, produce similar multifaceted diseases which range from rapidly fatal to protracted and chronic, and are a major cause of mortality in endemic regions. Besides causing natural infections, both microbes are Tier 1 potential biothreat agents. Antibiotic treatment is prolonged with variable results, hence effective vaccines are urgently needed. The purpose of our studies was to compare candidate vaccines that target both melioidosis and glanders to identify the most efficacious one(s) and define residual requirements for their transition to the non-human primate aerosol model. Studies were conducted in the C57BL/6 mouse model to evaluate the humoral and cell-mediated immune response and protective efficacy of three Burkholderia vaccine candidates against lethal aerosol challenges with B. pseudomallei K96243, B. pseudomallei MSHR5855, and B. mallei FMH. The recombinant vaccines generated significant immune responses to the vaccine antigens, and the live attenuated vaccine generated a greater immune response to OPS and the whole bacterial cells. Regardless of the candidate vaccine evaluated, the protection of mice was associated with a dampened cytokine response within the lungs after exposure to aerosolized bacteria. Despite being delivered by two different platforms and generating distinct immune responses, two experimental vaccines, a capsule conjugate + Hcp1 subunit vaccine and the live B. pseudomallei 668 ΔilvI strain, provided significant protection and were down-selected for further investigation and advanced development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9428723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94287232022-09-01 Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders Biryukov, Sergei S. Cote, Christopher K. Klimko, Christopher P. Dankmeyer, Jennifer L. Rill, Nathaniel O. Shoe, Jennifer L. Hunter, Melissa Shamsuddin, Zain Velez, Ivan Hedrick, Zander M. Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa Talyansky, Yuli Schmidt, Lindsey K. Orne, Caitlyn E. Fetterer, David P. Burtnick, Mary N. Brett, Paul J. Welkos, Susan L. DeShazer, David Front Microbiol Microbiology Burkholderia pseudomallei and the closely related species, Burkholderia mallei, produce similar multifaceted diseases which range from rapidly fatal to protracted and chronic, and are a major cause of mortality in endemic regions. Besides causing natural infections, both microbes are Tier 1 potential biothreat agents. Antibiotic treatment is prolonged with variable results, hence effective vaccines are urgently needed. The purpose of our studies was to compare candidate vaccines that target both melioidosis and glanders to identify the most efficacious one(s) and define residual requirements for their transition to the non-human primate aerosol model. Studies were conducted in the C57BL/6 mouse model to evaluate the humoral and cell-mediated immune response and protective efficacy of three Burkholderia vaccine candidates against lethal aerosol challenges with B. pseudomallei K96243, B. pseudomallei MSHR5855, and B. mallei FMH. The recombinant vaccines generated significant immune responses to the vaccine antigens, and the live attenuated vaccine generated a greater immune response to OPS and the whole bacterial cells. Regardless of the candidate vaccine evaluated, the protection of mice was associated with a dampened cytokine response within the lungs after exposure to aerosolized bacteria. Despite being delivered by two different platforms and generating distinct immune responses, two experimental vaccines, a capsule conjugate + Hcp1 subunit vaccine and the live B. pseudomallei 668 ΔilvI strain, provided significant protection and were down-selected for further investigation and advanced development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9428723/ /pubmed/36060742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.965518 Text en Copyright © 2022 Biryukov, Cote, Klimko, Dankmeyer, Rill, Shoe, Hunter, Shamsuddin, Velez, Hedrick, Rosario-Acevedo, Talyansky, Schmidt, Orne, Fetterer, Burtnick, Brett, Welkos and DeShazer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Biryukov, Sergei S. Cote, Christopher K. Klimko, Christopher P. Dankmeyer, Jennifer L. Rill, Nathaniel O. Shoe, Jennifer L. Hunter, Melissa Shamsuddin, Zain Velez, Ivan Hedrick, Zander M. Rosario-Acevedo, Raysa Talyansky, Yuli Schmidt, Lindsey K. Orne, Caitlyn E. Fetterer, David P. Burtnick, Mary N. Brett, Paul J. Welkos, Susan L. DeShazer, David Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders |
title | Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders |
title_full | Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders |
title_short | Evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders |
title_sort | evaluation of two different vaccine platforms for immunization against melioidosis and glanders |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.965518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biryukovsergeis evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT cotechristopherk evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT klimkochristopherp evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT dankmeyerjenniferl evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT rillnathanielo evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT shoejenniferl evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT huntermelissa evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT shamsuddinzain evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT velezivan evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT hedrickzanderm evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT rosarioacevedoraysa evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT talyanskyyuli evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT schmidtlindseyk evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT ornecaitlyne evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT fettererdavidp evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT burtnickmaryn evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT brettpaulj evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT welkossusanl evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders AT deshazerdavid evaluationoftwodifferentvaccineplatformsforimmunizationagainstmelioidosisandglanders |