Cargando…

2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality

BACKGROUND: US News and World Report (USNWR) publishes well-known rankings of graduate health programs. Medicine and nursing are ranked with weighted metrics using multiple criteria, and medical schools are ranked separately according to their focus (research or primary care). USNWR pharmacy school...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lebovitz, Lisa, Daugherty, Kimberly K., DiVall, Margarita V., Boyce, Eric G., Rudolph, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100169
_version_ 1784779253914533888
author Lebovitz, Lisa
Daugherty, Kimberly K.
DiVall, Margarita V.
Boyce, Eric G.
Rudolph, Michael
author_facet Lebovitz, Lisa
Daugherty, Kimberly K.
DiVall, Margarita V.
Boyce, Eric G.
Rudolph, Michael
author_sort Lebovitz, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: US News and World Report (USNWR) publishes well-known rankings of graduate health programs. Medicine and nursing are ranked with weighted metrics using multiple criteria, and medical schools are ranked separately according to their focus (research or primary care). USNWR pharmacy school rankings are based on a single-question peer perception survey. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a simple, transparent framework to rank US colleges and schools of pharmacy in overall quality and separately based on program quality and research quality, using data that are readily available to the academy. METHODS: Data for three education quality and four research quality metrics were obtained for 2020. Each metric was standardized and ranked, and then each set was summed to determine separate ranks for education and research. Education and research scores were combined using equal weights to provide a single rank for overall quality. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of assigning higher proportionate value to education, similar to USNWR medical school rankings. RESULTS: Distinct ranks were produced for education, research, overall (education: research) 50:50, and overall 60:40. Sensitivity analysis suggests the more disproportionately the education and research factors are weighted, the more ranks change. Mid-ranked schools were most impacted when weightings changed due to relative strength in one factor and relative weakness in the other. When weighted 60:40, nine (7%) mid-ranked programs improved in rank, while 11 (11%) worsened in rank compared to the 50:50 model. CONCLUSION: Separately ranking education and research can highlight the diverse strengths of pharmacy schools. The proposed model is based on easily obtainable data and is easily reproducible, allowing for annual rankings. These rankings may be used by PharmD and PhD applicants when selecting schools and by pharmacy schools to benchmark true and aspirational peers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9428857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94288572022-09-01 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality Lebovitz, Lisa Daugherty, Kimberly K. DiVall, Margarita V. Boyce, Eric G. Rudolph, Michael Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Article BACKGROUND: US News and World Report (USNWR) publishes well-known rankings of graduate health programs. Medicine and nursing are ranked with weighted metrics using multiple criteria, and medical schools are ranked separately according to their focus (research or primary care). USNWR pharmacy school rankings are based on a single-question peer perception survey. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a simple, transparent framework to rank US colleges and schools of pharmacy in overall quality and separately based on program quality and research quality, using data that are readily available to the academy. METHODS: Data for three education quality and four research quality metrics were obtained for 2020. Each metric was standardized and ranked, and then each set was summed to determine separate ranks for education and research. Education and research scores were combined using equal weights to provide a single rank for overall quality. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of assigning higher proportionate value to education, similar to USNWR medical school rankings. RESULTS: Distinct ranks were produced for education, research, overall (education: research) 50:50, and overall 60:40. Sensitivity analysis suggests the more disproportionately the education and research factors are weighted, the more ranks change. Mid-ranked schools were most impacted when weightings changed due to relative strength in one factor and relative weakness in the other. When weighted 60:40, nine (7%) mid-ranked programs improved in rank, while 11 (11%) worsened in rank compared to the 50:50 model. CONCLUSION: Separately ranking education and research can highlight the diverse strengths of pharmacy schools. The proposed model is based on easily obtainable data and is easily reproducible, allowing for annual rankings. These rankings may be used by PharmD and PhD applicants when selecting schools and by pharmacy schools to benchmark true and aspirational peers. Elsevier 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9428857/ /pubmed/36061638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100169 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lebovitz, Lisa
Daugherty, Kimberly K.
DiVall, Margarita V.
Boyce, Eric G.
Rudolph, Michael
2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_full 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_fullStr 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_full_unstemmed 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_short 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_sort 2020 rankings for us pharmd programs, research, and overall quality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100169
work_keys_str_mv AT lebovitzlisa 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality
AT daughertykimberlyk 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality
AT divallmargaritav 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality
AT boyceericg 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality
AT rudolphmichael 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality