Cargando…
BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity
Recent work identified single time points (“events”) of high regional cofluctuation in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) which contain more large-scale brain network information than other, low cofluctuation time points. This suggested that events might be a discrete, temporally sparse si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119476 |
_version_ | 1784779276983205888 |
---|---|
author | Ladwig, Zach Seitzman, Benjamin A. Dworetsky, Ally Yu, Yuhua Adeyemo, Babatunde Smith, Derek M. Petersen, Steven E. Gratton, Caterina |
author_facet | Ladwig, Zach Seitzman, Benjamin A. Dworetsky, Ally Yu, Yuhua Adeyemo, Babatunde Smith, Derek M. Petersen, Steven E. Gratton, Caterina |
author_sort | Ladwig, Zach |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent work identified single time points (“events”) of high regional cofluctuation in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) which contain more large-scale brain network information than other, low cofluctuation time points. This suggested that events might be a discrete, temporally sparse signal which drives functional connectivity (FC) over the timeseries. However, a different, not yet explored possibility is that network information differences between time points are driven by sampling variability on a constant, static, noisy signal. Using a combination of real and simulated data, we examined the relationship between cofluctuation and network structure and asked if this relationship was unique, or if it could arise from sampling variability alone. First, we show that events are not discrete – there is a gradually increasing relationship between network structure and cofluctuation; ~50% of samples show very strong network structure. Second, using simulations we show that this relationship is predicted from sampling variability on static FC. Finally, we show that randomly selected points can capture network structure about as well as events, largely because of their temporal spacing. Together, these results suggest that, while events exhibit particularly strong representations of static FC, there is little evidence that events are unique timepoints that drive FC structure. Instead, a parsimonious explanation for the data is that events arise from a single static, but noisy, FC structure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9428936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94289362022-10-15 BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity Ladwig, Zach Seitzman, Benjamin A. Dworetsky, Ally Yu, Yuhua Adeyemo, Babatunde Smith, Derek M. Petersen, Steven E. Gratton, Caterina Neuroimage Article Recent work identified single time points (“events”) of high regional cofluctuation in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) which contain more large-scale brain network information than other, low cofluctuation time points. This suggested that events might be a discrete, temporally sparse signal which drives functional connectivity (FC) over the timeseries. However, a different, not yet explored possibility is that network information differences between time points are driven by sampling variability on a constant, static, noisy signal. Using a combination of real and simulated data, we examined the relationship between cofluctuation and network structure and asked if this relationship was unique, or if it could arise from sampling variability alone. First, we show that events are not discrete – there is a gradually increasing relationship between network structure and cofluctuation; ~50% of samples show very strong network structure. Second, using simulations we show that this relationship is predicted from sampling variability on static FC. Finally, we show that randomly selected points can capture network structure about as well as events, largely because of their temporal spacing. Together, these results suggest that, while events exhibit particularly strong representations of static FC, there is little evidence that events are unique timepoints that drive FC structure. Instead, a parsimonious explanation for the data is that events arise from a single static, but noisy, FC structure. 2022-10-15 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9428936/ /pubmed/35842100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119476 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Ladwig, Zach Seitzman, Benjamin A. Dworetsky, Ally Yu, Yuhua Adeyemo, Babatunde Smith, Derek M. Petersen, Steven E. Gratton, Caterina BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity |
title | BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity |
title_full | BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity |
title_fullStr | BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity |
title_full_unstemmed | BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity |
title_short | BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity |
title_sort | bold cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ladwigzach boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity AT seitzmanbenjamina boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity AT dworetskyally boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity AT yuyuhua boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity AT adeyemobabatunde boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity AT smithderekm boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity AT petersenstevene boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity AT grattoncaterina boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity |