Cargando…

BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity

Recent work identified single time points (“events”) of high regional cofluctuation in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) which contain more large-scale brain network information than other, low cofluctuation time points. This suggested that events might be a discrete, temporally sparse si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ladwig, Zach, Seitzman, Benjamin A., Dworetsky, Ally, Yu, Yuhua, Adeyemo, Babatunde, Smith, Derek M., Petersen, Steven E., Gratton, Caterina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119476
_version_ 1784779276983205888
author Ladwig, Zach
Seitzman, Benjamin A.
Dworetsky, Ally
Yu, Yuhua
Adeyemo, Babatunde
Smith, Derek M.
Petersen, Steven E.
Gratton, Caterina
author_facet Ladwig, Zach
Seitzman, Benjamin A.
Dworetsky, Ally
Yu, Yuhua
Adeyemo, Babatunde
Smith, Derek M.
Petersen, Steven E.
Gratton, Caterina
author_sort Ladwig, Zach
collection PubMed
description Recent work identified single time points (“events”) of high regional cofluctuation in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) which contain more large-scale brain network information than other, low cofluctuation time points. This suggested that events might be a discrete, temporally sparse signal which drives functional connectivity (FC) over the timeseries. However, a different, not yet explored possibility is that network information differences between time points are driven by sampling variability on a constant, static, noisy signal. Using a combination of real and simulated data, we examined the relationship between cofluctuation and network structure and asked if this relationship was unique, or if it could arise from sampling variability alone. First, we show that events are not discrete – there is a gradually increasing relationship between network structure and cofluctuation; ~50% of samples show very strong network structure. Second, using simulations we show that this relationship is predicted from sampling variability on static FC. Finally, we show that randomly selected points can capture network structure about as well as events, largely because of their temporal spacing. Together, these results suggest that, while events exhibit particularly strong representations of static FC, there is little evidence that events are unique timepoints that drive FC structure. Instead, a parsimonious explanation for the data is that events arise from a single static, but noisy, FC structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9428936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94289362022-10-15 BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity Ladwig, Zach Seitzman, Benjamin A. Dworetsky, Ally Yu, Yuhua Adeyemo, Babatunde Smith, Derek M. Petersen, Steven E. Gratton, Caterina Neuroimage Article Recent work identified single time points (“events”) of high regional cofluctuation in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) which contain more large-scale brain network information than other, low cofluctuation time points. This suggested that events might be a discrete, temporally sparse signal which drives functional connectivity (FC) over the timeseries. However, a different, not yet explored possibility is that network information differences between time points are driven by sampling variability on a constant, static, noisy signal. Using a combination of real and simulated data, we examined the relationship between cofluctuation and network structure and asked if this relationship was unique, or if it could arise from sampling variability alone. First, we show that events are not discrete – there is a gradually increasing relationship between network structure and cofluctuation; ~50% of samples show very strong network structure. Second, using simulations we show that this relationship is predicted from sampling variability on static FC. Finally, we show that randomly selected points can capture network structure about as well as events, largely because of their temporal spacing. Together, these results suggest that, while events exhibit particularly strong representations of static FC, there is little evidence that events are unique timepoints that drive FC structure. Instead, a parsimonious explanation for the data is that events arise from a single static, but noisy, FC structure. 2022-10-15 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9428936/ /pubmed/35842100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119476 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Article
Ladwig, Zach
Seitzman, Benjamin A.
Dworetsky, Ally
Yu, Yuhua
Adeyemo, Babatunde
Smith, Derek M.
Petersen, Steven E.
Gratton, Caterina
BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity
title BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity
title_full BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity
title_fullStr BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity
title_full_unstemmed BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity
title_short BOLD cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity
title_sort bold cofluctuation ‘events’ are predicted from static functional connectivity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119476
work_keys_str_mv AT ladwigzach boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity
AT seitzmanbenjamina boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity
AT dworetskyally boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity
AT yuyuhua boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity
AT adeyemobabatunde boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity
AT smithderekm boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity
AT petersenstevene boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity
AT grattoncaterina boldcofluctuationeventsarepredictedfromstaticfunctionalconnectivity