Cargando…
How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are statements which are based on the best available evidence, and their goal is to improve the quality of patient care. Integrating clinical practice guidelines into computer systems can help physicians reduce medical errors and help them to have the best po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9429575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02063-7 |
_version_ | 1784779498355425280 |
---|---|
author | Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh Damanabi, Shahla Kalankesh, Leila R. Van de Velde, Stijn Feizi-Derakhshi, Mohammad-Reza Hajebrahimi, Sakineh |
author_facet | Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh Damanabi, Shahla Kalankesh, Leila R. Van de Velde, Stijn Feizi-Derakhshi, Mohammad-Reza Hajebrahimi, Sakineh |
author_sort | Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are statements which are based on the best available evidence, and their goal is to improve the quality of patient care. Integrating clinical practice guidelines into computer systems can help physicians reduce medical errors and help them to have the best possible practice. Guideline-based clinical decision support systems play a significant role in supporting physicians in their decisions. Meantime, system errors are the most critical concerns in designing decision support systems that can affect their performance and efficacy. A well-developed ontology can be helpful in this matter. The proposed systematic review will specify the methods, components, language of rules, and evaluation methods of current ontology-driven guideline-based clinical decision support systems. METHODS: This review will identify literature through searching MEDLINE (via Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, IEEEXplore, and ACM Digital Library. Gray literature, reference lists, and citing articles of the included studies will be searched. The quality of the included studies will be assessed by the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT-version 2018). At least two independent reviewers will perform the screening, quality assessment, and data extraction. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Proper data analysis will be performed based on the type of system and ontology engineering evaluation data. DISCUSSION: The study will provide evidence regarding applying ontologies in guideline-based clinical decision support systems. The findings of this systematic review will be a guide for decision support system designers and developers, technologists, system providers, policymakers, and stakeholders. Ontology builders can use the information in this review to build well-structured ontologies for personalized medicine. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018106501 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02063-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9429575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94295752022-09-01 How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh Damanabi, Shahla Kalankesh, Leila R. Van de Velde, Stijn Feizi-Derakhshi, Mohammad-Reza Hajebrahimi, Sakineh Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are statements which are based on the best available evidence, and their goal is to improve the quality of patient care. Integrating clinical practice guidelines into computer systems can help physicians reduce medical errors and help them to have the best possible practice. Guideline-based clinical decision support systems play a significant role in supporting physicians in their decisions. Meantime, system errors are the most critical concerns in designing decision support systems that can affect their performance and efficacy. A well-developed ontology can be helpful in this matter. The proposed systematic review will specify the methods, components, language of rules, and evaluation methods of current ontology-driven guideline-based clinical decision support systems. METHODS: This review will identify literature through searching MEDLINE (via Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, IEEEXplore, and ACM Digital Library. Gray literature, reference lists, and citing articles of the included studies will be searched. The quality of the included studies will be assessed by the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT-version 2018). At least two independent reviewers will perform the screening, quality assessment, and data extraction. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Proper data analysis will be performed based on the type of system and ontology engineering evaluation data. DISCUSSION: The study will provide evidence regarding applying ontologies in guideline-based clinical decision support systems. The findings of this systematic review will be a guide for decision support system designers and developers, technologists, system providers, policymakers, and stakeholders. Ontology builders can use the information in this review to build well-structured ontologies for personalized medicine. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018106501 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02063-7. BioMed Central 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9429575/ /pubmed/36042520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02063-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh Damanabi, Shahla Kalankesh, Leila R. Van de Velde, Stijn Feizi-Derakhshi, Mohammad-Reza Hajebrahimi, Sakineh How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review |
title | How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | how are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9429575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02063-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sadeghighyassifatemeh howareontologiesimplementedtorepresentclinicalpracticeguidelinesinclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsprotocolforasystematicreview AT damanabishahla howareontologiesimplementedtorepresentclinicalpracticeguidelinesinclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsprotocolforasystematicreview AT kalankeshleilar howareontologiesimplementedtorepresentclinicalpracticeguidelinesinclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsprotocolforasystematicreview AT vandeveldestijn howareontologiesimplementedtorepresentclinicalpracticeguidelinesinclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsprotocolforasystematicreview AT feiziderakhshimohammadreza howareontologiesimplementedtorepresentclinicalpracticeguidelinesinclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsprotocolforasystematicreview AT hajebrahimisakineh howareontologiesimplementedtorepresentclinicalpracticeguidelinesinclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsprotocolforasystematicreview |