Cargando…
Estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study
BACKGROUND: A classic methodology used in evaluating the impact of health policy interventions is interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis, applying a quasi-experimental design that uses both pre- and post-policy data without randomization. In this paper, we took a simulation-based approach to estimat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9429656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36045338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01716-4 |
_version_ | 1784779524476502016 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Huan Feng, Xinyang Lange, Shannon Tran, Alexander Manthey, Jakob Rehm, Jürgen |
author_facet | Jiang, Huan Feng, Xinyang Lange, Shannon Tran, Alexander Manthey, Jakob Rehm, Jürgen |
author_sort | Jiang, Huan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A classic methodology used in evaluating the impact of health policy interventions is interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis, applying a quasi-experimental design that uses both pre- and post-policy data without randomization. In this paper, we took a simulation-based approach to estimating intervention effects under different assumptions. METHODS: Each of the simulated mortality rates contained a linear time trend, seasonality, autoregressive, and moving-average terms. The simulations of the policy effects involved three scenarios: 1) immediate-level change only, 2) immediate-level and slope change, and 3) lagged-level and slope change. The estimated effects and biases of these effects were examined via three matched generalized additive mixed models, each of which used two different approaches: 1) effects based on estimated coefficients (estimated approach), and 2) effects based on predictions from models (predicted approach). The robustness of these two approaches was further investigated assuming misspecification of the models. RESULTS: When one simulated dataset was analyzed with the matched model, the two analytical approaches produced similar estimates. However, when the models were misspecified, the number of deaths prevented, estimated using the predicted vs. estimated approaches, were very different, with the predicted approach yielding estimates closer to the real effect. The discrepancy was larger when the policy was applied early in the time-series. CONCLUSION: Even when the sample size appears to be large enough, one should still be cautious when conducting ITS analyses, since the power also depends on when in the series the intervention occurs. In addition, the intervention lagged effect needs to be fully considered at the study design stage (i.e., when developing the models). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01716-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9429656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94296562022-09-01 Estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study Jiang, Huan Feng, Xinyang Lange, Shannon Tran, Alexander Manthey, Jakob Rehm, Jürgen BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: A classic methodology used in evaluating the impact of health policy interventions is interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis, applying a quasi-experimental design that uses both pre- and post-policy data without randomization. In this paper, we took a simulation-based approach to estimating intervention effects under different assumptions. METHODS: Each of the simulated mortality rates contained a linear time trend, seasonality, autoregressive, and moving-average terms. The simulations of the policy effects involved three scenarios: 1) immediate-level change only, 2) immediate-level and slope change, and 3) lagged-level and slope change. The estimated effects and biases of these effects were examined via three matched generalized additive mixed models, each of which used two different approaches: 1) effects based on estimated coefficients (estimated approach), and 2) effects based on predictions from models (predicted approach). The robustness of these two approaches was further investigated assuming misspecification of the models. RESULTS: When one simulated dataset was analyzed with the matched model, the two analytical approaches produced similar estimates. However, when the models were misspecified, the number of deaths prevented, estimated using the predicted vs. estimated approaches, were very different, with the predicted approach yielding estimates closer to the real effect. The discrepancy was larger when the policy was applied early in the time-series. CONCLUSION: Even when the sample size appears to be large enough, one should still be cautious when conducting ITS analyses, since the power also depends on when in the series the intervention occurs. In addition, the intervention lagged effect needs to be fully considered at the study design stage (i.e., when developing the models). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01716-4. BioMed Central 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9429656/ /pubmed/36045338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01716-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Jiang, Huan Feng, Xinyang Lange, Shannon Tran, Alexander Manthey, Jakob Rehm, Jürgen Estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study |
title | Estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study |
title_full | Estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study |
title_fullStr | Estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study |
title_short | Estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study |
title_sort | estimating effects of health policy interventions using interrupted time-series analyses: a simulation study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9429656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36045338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01716-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jianghuan estimatingeffectsofhealthpolicyinterventionsusinginterruptedtimeseriesanalysesasimulationstudy AT fengxinyang estimatingeffectsofhealthpolicyinterventionsusinginterruptedtimeseriesanalysesasimulationstudy AT langeshannon estimatingeffectsofhealthpolicyinterventionsusinginterruptedtimeseriesanalysesasimulationstudy AT tranalexander estimatingeffectsofhealthpolicyinterventionsusinginterruptedtimeseriesanalysesasimulationstudy AT mantheyjakob estimatingeffectsofhealthpolicyinterventionsusinginterruptedtimeseriesanalysesasimulationstudy AT rehmjurgen estimatingeffectsofhealthpolicyinterventionsusinginterruptedtimeseriesanalysesasimulationstudy |