Cargando…

Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD)

We aimed to review strategies for identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection before the availability of molecular test results, and to assess the reporting quality of the studies identified through the application of the STARD guideline. We screened 3,821 articles published until 30 April 2021, of which 23 me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cremades-Martínez, Paula, Parker, Lucy A., Chilet-Rosell, Elisa, Lumbreras, Blanca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9430610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00300-22
_version_ 1784779818650304512
author Cremades-Martínez, Paula
Parker, Lucy A.
Chilet-Rosell, Elisa
Lumbreras, Blanca
author_facet Cremades-Martínez, Paula
Parker, Lucy A.
Chilet-Rosell, Elisa
Lumbreras, Blanca
author_sort Cremades-Martínez, Paula
collection PubMed
description We aimed to review strategies for identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection before the availability of molecular test results, and to assess the reporting quality of the studies identified through the application of the STARD guideline. We screened 3,821 articles published until 30 April 2021, of which 23 met the inclusion criteria: including at least two diagnostic variables, being designed for use in clinical practice or in a public health context and providing diagnostic accuracy rates. Data extraction and application of STARD criteria were performed independently by two researchers and discrepancies were discussed with a third author. Most of the studies (16, 69.6%) included symptomatic patients with suspected infection, six studies (26.1%) included patients already diagnosed and one study (4.3%) included individuals with close contact to a COVID-positive patient. The main variables considered in the studies, which included symptomatic patients, were imaging and demographic characteristics, symptoms, and lymphocyte count. The values for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)ranged from 53-97.4. Seven studies (30.4%) validated the diagnostic model in an independent sample. The average number of STARD criteria fulfilled was 17.6 (maximum, 27 and minimum, 5). High diagnostic accuracy values are shown when more than one diagnostic variable is considered, mainly imaging and demographic characteristics, symptoms, and lymphocyte count. This could offer the potential to identify individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection with high accuracy when molecular testing is not available. However, external validation for developed models and evaluations in populations as similar as possible to those in which they will be applied is urgently needed. IMPORTANCE According to this review, the inclusion of more than one diagnostic test in the diagnostic process for COVID-19 infection shows high diagnostic accuracy values. Imaging characteristics, patients’ symptoms, demographic characteristics, and lymphocyte count were the variables most frequently included in the diagnostic models. However, developed models should be externally validated before reaching conclusions on their utility in practice. In addition, it is important to bear in mind that the test should be evaluated in populations as similar as possible to those in which it will be applied in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9430610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94306102022-09-01 Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD) Cremades-Martínez, Paula Parker, Lucy A. Chilet-Rosell, Elisa Lumbreras, Blanca Microbiol Spectr Research Article We aimed to review strategies for identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection before the availability of molecular test results, and to assess the reporting quality of the studies identified through the application of the STARD guideline. We screened 3,821 articles published until 30 April 2021, of which 23 met the inclusion criteria: including at least two diagnostic variables, being designed for use in clinical practice or in a public health context and providing diagnostic accuracy rates. Data extraction and application of STARD criteria were performed independently by two researchers and discrepancies were discussed with a third author. Most of the studies (16, 69.6%) included symptomatic patients with suspected infection, six studies (26.1%) included patients already diagnosed and one study (4.3%) included individuals with close contact to a COVID-positive patient. The main variables considered in the studies, which included symptomatic patients, were imaging and demographic characteristics, symptoms, and lymphocyte count. The values for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)ranged from 53-97.4. Seven studies (30.4%) validated the diagnostic model in an independent sample. The average number of STARD criteria fulfilled was 17.6 (maximum, 27 and minimum, 5). High diagnostic accuracy values are shown when more than one diagnostic variable is considered, mainly imaging and demographic characteristics, symptoms, and lymphocyte count. This could offer the potential to identify individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection with high accuracy when molecular testing is not available. However, external validation for developed models and evaluations in populations as similar as possible to those in which they will be applied is urgently needed. IMPORTANCE According to this review, the inclusion of more than one diagnostic test in the diagnostic process for COVID-19 infection shows high diagnostic accuracy values. Imaging characteristics, patients’ symptoms, demographic characteristics, and lymphocyte count were the variables most frequently included in the diagnostic models. However, developed models should be externally validated before reaching conclusions on their utility in practice. In addition, it is important to bear in mind that the test should be evaluated in populations as similar as possible to those in which it will be applied in practice. American Society for Microbiology 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9430610/ /pubmed/35699441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00300-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cremades-Martínez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Cremades-Martínez, Paula
Parker, Lucy A.
Chilet-Rosell, Elisa
Lumbreras, Blanca
Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD)
title Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD)
title_full Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD)
title_fullStr Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD)
title_short Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD)
title_sort evaluation of diagnostic strategies for identifying sars-cov-2 infection in clinical practice: a systematic review and compliance with the standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies guideline (stard)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9430610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00300-22
work_keys_str_mv AT cremadesmartinezpaula evaluationofdiagnosticstrategiesforidentifyingsarscov2infectioninclinicalpracticeasystematicreviewandcompliancewiththestandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesguidelinestard
AT parkerlucya evaluationofdiagnosticstrategiesforidentifyingsarscov2infectioninclinicalpracticeasystematicreviewandcompliancewiththestandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesguidelinestard
AT chiletrosellelisa evaluationofdiagnosticstrategiesforidentifyingsarscov2infectioninclinicalpracticeasystematicreviewandcompliancewiththestandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesguidelinestard
AT lumbrerasblanca evaluationofdiagnosticstrategiesforidentifyingsarscov2infectioninclinicalpracticeasystematicreviewandcompliancewiththestandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesguidelinestard