Cargando…

Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer

Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) have been widely used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In settings of low disease prevalence, such as asymptomatic community testing, national guidelines recommend confirmation of positive Ag-RDT r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LeBlanc, Jason J., McCracken, Gregory R., Goodall, Barbara, Hatchette, Todd F., Barrett, Lisa, Ross, John, Davidson, Ross J., Patriquin, Glenn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9430663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35863036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00639-22
_version_ 1784779836116434944
author LeBlanc, Jason J.
McCracken, Gregory R.
Goodall, Barbara
Hatchette, Todd F.
Barrett, Lisa
Ross, John
Davidson, Ross J.
Patriquin, Glenn
author_facet LeBlanc, Jason J.
McCracken, Gregory R.
Goodall, Barbara
Hatchette, Todd F.
Barrett, Lisa
Ross, John
Davidson, Ross J.
Patriquin, Glenn
author_sort LeBlanc, Jason J.
collection PubMed
description Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) have been widely used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In settings of low disease prevalence, such as asymptomatic community testing, national guidelines recommend confirmation of positive Ag-RDT results with a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). This often requires patients to be recalled for repeat specimen recollection and subsequent testing in reference laboratories. This project assessed the use of a point-of-care molecular NAAT for SARS-CoV-2 detection (i.e., ID NOW), which was performed on-site at a volunteer-led asymptomatic community testing site on the residual test buffer (RTB) from positive Ag-RDTs. The ID NOW NAAT assay was performed on RTB from two Ag-RDTs: the Abbott Panbio and BTNX Rapid Response assays. Results of ID NOW were compared to real-time RT-PCR at a reference laboratory. Along with investigations into the clinical performance of ID NOW on RTB, analytical specificity was assessed with a panel of various respiratory organisms. Of the Ag-RDTs results evaluated, all 354 Ag-RDTs results characterized as true positives by RT-PCR were accurately identified with ID NOW testing of RTB. No SARS-CoV-2 detections by ID NOW were observed from 10 specimens characterized as false-positive Ag-RDTs, or from contrived specimens with various respiratory organisms. The use of on-site molecular testing on RTB provides a suitable option for rapid confirmatory testing of positive Ag-RDTs, thereby obviating the need for specimen recollection for molecular testing at local reference laboratories. IMPORTANCE During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid antigen tests have been widely used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. These simple devices allow rapid test results. However, false-positive results may occur. As such, individuals with positive rapid tests often must return to testing centers to have a second swab collected, which is then transported to a specialized laboratory for confirmation using molecular tests. As an alternative to requiring a repeat visit and a prolonged turn-around time for result confirmation, this project evaluated whether the leftover material from rapid antigen tests could be confirmed directly on a portable point-of-care molecular instrument. Using this approach, molecular confirmation of positive antigen tests could be performed in less than 15 min, and the results were equivalent to laboratory-based confirmation. This procedure eliminates the need for individuals to return to testing centers following a positive rapid antigen test and ensures accurate antigen test results through on-site confirmation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9430663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94306632022-09-01 Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer LeBlanc, Jason J. McCracken, Gregory R. Goodall, Barbara Hatchette, Todd F. Barrett, Lisa Ross, John Davidson, Ross J. Patriquin, Glenn Microbiol Spectr Research Article Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) have been widely used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In settings of low disease prevalence, such as asymptomatic community testing, national guidelines recommend confirmation of positive Ag-RDT results with a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). This often requires patients to be recalled for repeat specimen recollection and subsequent testing in reference laboratories. This project assessed the use of a point-of-care molecular NAAT for SARS-CoV-2 detection (i.e., ID NOW), which was performed on-site at a volunteer-led asymptomatic community testing site on the residual test buffer (RTB) from positive Ag-RDTs. The ID NOW NAAT assay was performed on RTB from two Ag-RDTs: the Abbott Panbio and BTNX Rapid Response assays. Results of ID NOW were compared to real-time RT-PCR at a reference laboratory. Along with investigations into the clinical performance of ID NOW on RTB, analytical specificity was assessed with a panel of various respiratory organisms. Of the Ag-RDTs results evaluated, all 354 Ag-RDTs results characterized as true positives by RT-PCR were accurately identified with ID NOW testing of RTB. No SARS-CoV-2 detections by ID NOW were observed from 10 specimens characterized as false-positive Ag-RDTs, or from contrived specimens with various respiratory organisms. The use of on-site molecular testing on RTB provides a suitable option for rapid confirmatory testing of positive Ag-RDTs, thereby obviating the need for specimen recollection for molecular testing at local reference laboratories. IMPORTANCE During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid antigen tests have been widely used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. These simple devices allow rapid test results. However, false-positive results may occur. As such, individuals with positive rapid tests often must return to testing centers to have a second swab collected, which is then transported to a specialized laboratory for confirmation using molecular tests. As an alternative to requiring a repeat visit and a prolonged turn-around time for result confirmation, this project evaluated whether the leftover material from rapid antigen tests could be confirmed directly on a portable point-of-care molecular instrument. Using this approach, molecular confirmation of positive antigen tests could be performed in less than 15 min, and the results were equivalent to laboratory-based confirmation. This procedure eliminates the need for individuals to return to testing centers following a positive rapid antigen test and ensures accurate antigen test results through on-site confirmation. American Society for Microbiology 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9430663/ /pubmed/35863036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00639-22 Text en © Crown copyright 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
LeBlanc, Jason J.
McCracken, Gregory R.
Goodall, Barbara
Hatchette, Todd F.
Barrett, Lisa
Ross, John
Davidson, Ross J.
Patriquin, Glenn
Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer
title Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer
title_full Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer
title_fullStr Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer
title_full_unstemmed Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer
title_short Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer
title_sort avoiding false-positive sars-cov-2 rapid antigen test results with point-of-care molecular testing on residual test buffer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9430663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35863036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00639-22
work_keys_str_mv AT leblancjasonj avoidingfalsepositivesarscov2rapidantigentestresultswithpointofcaremoleculartestingonresidualtestbuffer
AT mccrackengregoryr avoidingfalsepositivesarscov2rapidantigentestresultswithpointofcaremoleculartestingonresidualtestbuffer
AT goodallbarbara avoidingfalsepositivesarscov2rapidantigentestresultswithpointofcaremoleculartestingonresidualtestbuffer
AT hatchettetoddf avoidingfalsepositivesarscov2rapidantigentestresultswithpointofcaremoleculartestingonresidualtestbuffer
AT barrettlisa avoidingfalsepositivesarscov2rapidantigentestresultswithpointofcaremoleculartestingonresidualtestbuffer
AT rossjohn avoidingfalsepositivesarscov2rapidantigentestresultswithpointofcaremoleculartestingonresidualtestbuffer
AT davidsonrossj avoidingfalsepositivesarscov2rapidantigentestresultswithpointofcaremoleculartestingonresidualtestbuffer
AT patriquinglenn avoidingfalsepositivesarscov2rapidantigentestresultswithpointofcaremoleculartestingonresidualtestbuffer