Cargando…

Opposing Growth Responses of Lepidopteran Larvae to the Establishment of Gut Microbiota

Gut microbiota can have diverse impacts on hosts, the nature of which often depend on the circumstances. For insect gut microbes, the quality and nature of host diets can be a significant force in swinging the pendulum from inconsequential to functionally important. In our study, we addressed whethe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mason, Charles J., Peiffer, Michelle, Chen, Bosheng, Hoover, Kelli, Felton, Gary W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9430775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35758749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01941-22
_version_ 1784779869356294144
author Mason, Charles J.
Peiffer, Michelle
Chen, Bosheng
Hoover, Kelli
Felton, Gary W.
author_facet Mason, Charles J.
Peiffer, Michelle
Chen, Bosheng
Hoover, Kelli
Felton, Gary W.
author_sort Mason, Charles J.
collection PubMed
description Gut microbiota can have diverse impacts on hosts, the nature of which often depend on the circumstances. For insect gut microbes, the quality and nature of host diets can be a significant force in swinging the pendulum from inconsequential to functionally important. In our study, we addressed whether beneficial microbes in one species impart similar functions to related species under identical conditions. Using fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua), and other noctuid hosts, we implemented an axenic rearing strategy and manipulated gut bacterial populations and dietary conditions. Our results revealed that some gut Enterococcus and Enterobacter isolates can facilitate utilization of a poor diet substrate by fall armyworm, but this was not the case for other more optimized diets. While Enterococcus provided benefits to fall armyworm, it was decidedly antagonistic to beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) under identical conditions. Unique isolates and bacterial introductions at early growth stages were critical to how both larval hosts performed. Our results provide robust evidence of the roles in which bacteria support lepidopteran larval growth, but also indicate that the directionality of these relationships can differ among congener hosts. IMPORTANCE Insects have intimate relationships with gut microbiota, where bacteria can contribute important functions to their invertebrate hosts. Lepidopterans are important insect pests, but how they engage with their gut bacteria and how that translates to impacts on the host are lacking. Here we demonstrate the facultative nature of gut microbiota in lepidopteran larvae and the importance of diet in driving mutualistic or antagonistic relationships. Using multiple lepidopteran species, we uncover that the same bacteria that can facilitate exploitation of a challenging diet in one host severely diminishes larval performance of another larval species. Additionally, we demonstrate the beneficial functions of gut microbiota on the hosts are not limited to one lineage, but rather multiple isolates can facilitate the exploitation of a suboptimal diet. Our results illuminate the context-dependent nature of the gut microbiomes in invertebrates, and how host-specific microbial engagement can produce dramatically different interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9430775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94307752022-09-01 Opposing Growth Responses of Lepidopteran Larvae to the Establishment of Gut Microbiota Mason, Charles J. Peiffer, Michelle Chen, Bosheng Hoover, Kelli Felton, Gary W. Microbiol Spectr Research Article Gut microbiota can have diverse impacts on hosts, the nature of which often depend on the circumstances. For insect gut microbes, the quality and nature of host diets can be a significant force in swinging the pendulum from inconsequential to functionally important. In our study, we addressed whether beneficial microbes in one species impart similar functions to related species under identical conditions. Using fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua), and other noctuid hosts, we implemented an axenic rearing strategy and manipulated gut bacterial populations and dietary conditions. Our results revealed that some gut Enterococcus and Enterobacter isolates can facilitate utilization of a poor diet substrate by fall armyworm, but this was not the case for other more optimized diets. While Enterococcus provided benefits to fall armyworm, it was decidedly antagonistic to beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) under identical conditions. Unique isolates and bacterial introductions at early growth stages were critical to how both larval hosts performed. Our results provide robust evidence of the roles in which bacteria support lepidopteran larval growth, but also indicate that the directionality of these relationships can differ among congener hosts. IMPORTANCE Insects have intimate relationships with gut microbiota, where bacteria can contribute important functions to their invertebrate hosts. Lepidopterans are important insect pests, but how they engage with their gut bacteria and how that translates to impacts on the host are lacking. Here we demonstrate the facultative nature of gut microbiota in lepidopteran larvae and the importance of diet in driving mutualistic or antagonistic relationships. Using multiple lepidopteran species, we uncover that the same bacteria that can facilitate exploitation of a challenging diet in one host severely diminishes larval performance of another larval species. Additionally, we demonstrate the beneficial functions of gut microbiota on the hosts are not limited to one lineage, but rather multiple isolates can facilitate the exploitation of a suboptimal diet. Our results illuminate the context-dependent nature of the gut microbiomes in invertebrates, and how host-specific microbial engagement can produce dramatically different interactions. American Society for Microbiology 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9430775/ /pubmed/35758749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01941-22 Text en https://doi.org/10.1128/AuthorWarrantyLicense.v1This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mason, Charles J.
Peiffer, Michelle
Chen, Bosheng
Hoover, Kelli
Felton, Gary W.
Opposing Growth Responses of Lepidopteran Larvae to the Establishment of Gut Microbiota
title Opposing Growth Responses of Lepidopteran Larvae to the Establishment of Gut Microbiota
title_full Opposing Growth Responses of Lepidopteran Larvae to the Establishment of Gut Microbiota
title_fullStr Opposing Growth Responses of Lepidopteran Larvae to the Establishment of Gut Microbiota
title_full_unstemmed Opposing Growth Responses of Lepidopteran Larvae to the Establishment of Gut Microbiota
title_short Opposing Growth Responses of Lepidopteran Larvae to the Establishment of Gut Microbiota
title_sort opposing growth responses of lepidopteran larvae to the establishment of gut microbiota
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9430775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35758749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01941-22
work_keys_str_mv AT masoncharlesj opposinggrowthresponsesoflepidopteranlarvaetotheestablishmentofgutmicrobiota
AT peiffermichelle opposinggrowthresponsesoflepidopteranlarvaetotheestablishmentofgutmicrobiota
AT chenbosheng opposinggrowthresponsesoflepidopteranlarvaetotheestablishmentofgutmicrobiota
AT hooverkelli opposinggrowthresponsesoflepidopteranlarvaetotheestablishmentofgutmicrobiota
AT feltongaryw opposinggrowthresponsesoflepidopteranlarvaetotheestablishmentofgutmicrobiota