Cargando…
Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis on T1 Relaxometry in Comparison with Fibroscan
PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine whether the T1 relaxation time of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging is useful for detecting and staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients with suspected focal liver lesion...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9431815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.81.2.365 |
_version_ | 1784780158491688960 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine whether the T1 relaxation time of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging is useful for detecting and staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients with suspected focal liver lesion underwent MR imaging and Fibroscan. Fibroscan was chosen as the reference standard for classifying liver fibrosis. T1 relaxation times were acquired before (preT1), 20 minutes after (postT1) contrast administration, and reduction rate of T1 relaxation time (rrT1) on transverse 3D VIBE (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination) sequence using 3T MR imaging. The optimal cut-off values for the fibrosis staging were determined with ROC analysis. RESULTS: PreT1 and postT1 increased and rrT1 decreased constantly with increasing severity of liver fibrosis according to the METAVIR score (F0–F4). There were statistically significant differences between F2 and F3 in preT1 (F2, 836.0 ± 74.7 ms; F3, 888.6 ± 77.5 ms, p < 0.05) and between F3 and F4 in postT1 (F3, 309.0 ± 80.2 ms; F4, 406.6 ± 147.7 ms, p < 0.05) and rrT1 (F3, 65.4 ± 7.7%; F4, 57.3 ± 11.4%, p < 0.05). ROC analysis revealed that combination test (preT1 + postT1) was the best test for predicting liver fibrosis. CONCLUSION: PreT1 and postT1 increased constantly with increasing severity of liver fibrosis. T1 mapping in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging could be a helpful complementary sequence to determine the liver fibrosis stage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9431815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94318152022-10-12 Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis on T1 Relaxometry in Comparison with Fibroscan Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi Abdominal Imaging PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine whether the T1 relaxation time of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging is useful for detecting and staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients with suspected focal liver lesion underwent MR imaging and Fibroscan. Fibroscan was chosen as the reference standard for classifying liver fibrosis. T1 relaxation times were acquired before (preT1), 20 minutes after (postT1) contrast administration, and reduction rate of T1 relaxation time (rrT1) on transverse 3D VIBE (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination) sequence using 3T MR imaging. The optimal cut-off values for the fibrosis staging were determined with ROC analysis. RESULTS: PreT1 and postT1 increased and rrT1 decreased constantly with increasing severity of liver fibrosis according to the METAVIR score (F0–F4). There were statistically significant differences between F2 and F3 in preT1 (F2, 836.0 ± 74.7 ms; F3, 888.6 ± 77.5 ms, p < 0.05) and between F3 and F4 in postT1 (F3, 309.0 ± 80.2 ms; F4, 406.6 ± 147.7 ms, p < 0.05) and rrT1 (F3, 65.4 ± 7.7%; F4, 57.3 ± 11.4%, p < 0.05). ROC analysis revealed that combination test (preT1 + postT1) was the best test for predicting liver fibrosis. CONCLUSION: PreT1 and postT1 increased constantly with increasing severity of liver fibrosis. T1 mapping in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging could be a helpful complementary sequence to determine the liver fibrosis stage. The Korean Society of Radiology 2020-03 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9431815/ /pubmed/36237376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.81.2.365 Text en Copyrights © 2020 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abdominal Imaging Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis on T1 Relaxometry in Comparison with Fibroscan |
title | Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis on T1 Relaxometry in Comparison with Fibroscan |
title_full | Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis on T1 Relaxometry in Comparison with Fibroscan |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis on T1 Relaxometry in Comparison with Fibroscan |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis on T1 Relaxometry in Comparison with Fibroscan |
title_short | Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis on T1 Relaxometry in Comparison with Fibroscan |
title_sort | quantitative evaluation of liver fibrosis on t1 relaxometry in comparison with fibroscan |
topic | Abdominal Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9431815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.81.2.365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quantitativeevaluationofliverfibrosisont1relaxometryincomparisonwithfibroscan AT quantitativeevaluationofliverfibrosisont1relaxometryincomparisonwithfibroscan AT quantitativeevaluationofliverfibrosisont1relaxometryincomparisonwithfibroscan AT quantitativeevaluationofliverfibrosisont1relaxometryincomparisonwithfibroscan AT quantitativeevaluationofliverfibrosisont1relaxometryincomparisonwithfibroscan |