Cargando…
Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews
INTRODUCTION: Making the case for investing in preventative public health by illustrating not only the health impact but the social, economic and environmental value of Public Health Institutes is imperative. This is captured by the concept of Social Value, which when measured, demonstrates the comb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36062109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.906286 |
_version_ | 1784780557118341120 |
---|---|
author | Ashton, Kathryn Green, Liz Clemens, Timo Parry-Williams, Lee Dyakova, Mariana Bellis, Mark A. |
author_facet | Ashton, Kathryn Green, Liz Clemens, Timo Parry-Williams, Lee Dyakova, Mariana Bellis, Mark A. |
author_sort | Ashton, Kathryn |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Making the case for investing in preventative public health by illustrating not only the health impact but the social, economic and environmental value of Public Health Institutes is imperative. This is captured by the concept of Social Value, which when measured, demonstrates the combined intersectoral value of public health. There is currently insufficient research and evidence to show the social value of Public Health Institutes and their work across the life course, population groups and settings, in order to make the case for more investment. METHODS: During July 2021, a quantitative online self-administered questionnaire was conducted across international networks. Semi-structured interviews were also carried out with nine representatives to gain a deeper understanding. A thematic analysis was undertaken on the data collected. RESULTS: In total, 82.3% (n = 14) were aware of the terminology of social value and 58.8% (n = 10) were aware of the economic method of Social Return on Investment. However, only two Institutes reported capturing social and community impacts within their economic analysis and only 41.2% (n = 7) currently capture or measure the social value of their actions. Interviews and survey responses indicate a lack of resources, skills and buy-in from political powers. Finally, 76.5% (n = 12) wanted to do more to understand and measure wider outcomes and impact of their actions. It was noted this can be achieved through enhancing political will, developing a community of best practice and tools. CONCLUSION: This research can inform future work to understand how to measure the holistic social value of Public Health Institutes, in order to strengthen institutional capacity and impact, as well as to achieve a more equitable society, and a more sustainable health system and economy, making the case for investing in public health, as we recover from COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9433116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94331162022-09-01 Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews Ashton, Kathryn Green, Liz Clemens, Timo Parry-Williams, Lee Dyakova, Mariana Bellis, Mark A. Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: Making the case for investing in preventative public health by illustrating not only the health impact but the social, economic and environmental value of Public Health Institutes is imperative. This is captured by the concept of Social Value, which when measured, demonstrates the combined intersectoral value of public health. There is currently insufficient research and evidence to show the social value of Public Health Institutes and their work across the life course, population groups and settings, in order to make the case for more investment. METHODS: During July 2021, a quantitative online self-administered questionnaire was conducted across international networks. Semi-structured interviews were also carried out with nine representatives to gain a deeper understanding. A thematic analysis was undertaken on the data collected. RESULTS: In total, 82.3% (n = 14) were aware of the terminology of social value and 58.8% (n = 10) were aware of the economic method of Social Return on Investment. However, only two Institutes reported capturing social and community impacts within their economic analysis and only 41.2% (n = 7) currently capture or measure the social value of their actions. Interviews and survey responses indicate a lack of resources, skills and buy-in from political powers. Finally, 76.5% (n = 12) wanted to do more to understand and measure wider outcomes and impact of their actions. It was noted this can be achieved through enhancing political will, developing a community of best practice and tools. CONCLUSION: This research can inform future work to understand how to measure the holistic social value of Public Health Institutes, in order to strengthen institutional capacity and impact, as well as to achieve a more equitable society, and a more sustainable health system and economy, making the case for investing in public health, as we recover from COVID-19. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9433116/ /pubmed/36062109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.906286 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ashton, Green, Clemens, Parry-Williams, Dyakova and Bellis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Ashton, Kathryn Green, Liz Clemens, Timo Parry-Williams, Lee Dyakova, Mariana Bellis, Mark A. Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews |
title | Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews |
title_full | Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews |
title_fullStr | Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews |
title_short | Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews |
title_sort | exploring the social value of public health institutes: an international scoping survey and expert interviews |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36062109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.906286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashtonkathryn exploringthesocialvalueofpublichealthinstitutesaninternationalscopingsurveyandexpertinterviews AT greenliz exploringthesocialvalueofpublichealthinstitutesaninternationalscopingsurveyandexpertinterviews AT clemenstimo exploringthesocialvalueofpublichealthinstitutesaninternationalscopingsurveyandexpertinterviews AT parrywilliamslee exploringthesocialvalueofpublichealthinstitutesaninternationalscopingsurveyandexpertinterviews AT dyakovamariana exploringthesocialvalueofpublichealthinstitutesaninternationalscopingsurveyandexpertinterviews AT bellismarka exploringthesocialvalueofpublichealthinstitutesaninternationalscopingsurveyandexpertinterviews |