Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Access (dTRA) in Patients with Low Body Mass Index

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of coronary intervention via distal transradial access (dTRA) in patients with low body mass index (BMI). A total of 67 patients with low BMI who underwent coronary intervention, comprising 29 patients via dTRA and 38 patients via conventional t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, La-Mei, Zhang, Liu-Yan, Huang, Hao-Min, Chen, Tao, Li, Feng, Shi, Gan-Wei, Li, Wen-Hua, Xiao, Jian-Qiang, Gong, Chun, Xue, She-Liang, Xu, Bo, Gu, Jun, Song, Yan-Bin, Shen, Dan-Dan, Ji, Rong-Rong, Cai, Gao-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1901139
Descripción
Sumario:The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of coronary intervention via distal transradial access (dTRA) in patients with low body mass index (BMI). A total of 67 patients with low BMI who underwent coronary intervention, comprising 29 patients via dTRA and 38 patients via conventional transradial access (cTRA), were retrospectively included. There was no significant difference in the puncture success rate between the two groups (dTRA 96.6%, cTRA 97.4%, P=0.846). Compared with the cTRA group, the success rate of one-needle puncture in the dTRA group was lower (51.7% vs. 81.6%, P=0.020). The compression haemostasis time in the dTRA group was shorter than that in the cTRA group (P  <  0.001). However, the incidence of radial artery occlusion was lower in the dTRA group than in the cTRA group (4.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.007). In conclusion, coronary intervention via dTRA was safe and effective in patients with low BMI.

Ejemplares similares