Cargando…

Case report: Gross persistent rectal prolapse. A case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing

A previously well 15-year-old male presented with a history of gross rectal prolapse (GRP) involving full-thickness rectal prolapse of increasing severity and incidence over 6 months that occurred with every bowel motion, varying from 10 to 40 cm. He denied constipation and passed a soft motion once...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyano, Go, Yamada, Shunsuke, Murakami, Hiroshi, Lane, Geoffrey J., Yamataka, Atsuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.900081
_version_ 1784780643535683584
author Miyano, Go
Yamada, Shunsuke
Murakami, Hiroshi
Lane, Geoffrey J.
Yamataka, Atsuyuki
author_facet Miyano, Go
Yamada, Shunsuke
Murakami, Hiroshi
Lane, Geoffrey J.
Yamataka, Atsuyuki
author_sort Miyano, Go
collection PubMed
description A previously well 15-year-old male presented with a history of gross rectal prolapse (GRP) involving full-thickness rectal prolapse of increasing severity and incidence over 6 months that occurred with every bowel motion, varying from 10 to 40 cm. He denied constipation and passed a soft motion once daily, adeptly reducing his prolapsed rectum after each motion. This case illustrates technical challenges and planning for surgical intervention for optimal treatment in keeping with an FDA alert issued April, 2019 banning surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Preoperative fluoroscopic defecography confirmed rectal prolapse beginning with eversion of the anal verge identified on inspection. For surgery, general anesthesia was induced, he was placed in a Trendelenburg position, and four ports were inserted. The peritoneum was incised and blunt dissection used to expose the levator ani complex (LAC) taking care to prevent lateral nerve injury and preserve regional vascularity. Seven polypropylene sutures were used to fix the seromuscular posterior wall of the rectum to the median raphe of the LAC, the presacral fascia, and the periosteum of the sacral promontory. Operative time was 170 min. Postoperative recovery and progress were unremarkable. Currently, 5 years postoperatively, defecation is regular without recurrence of prolapse. For prolapse involving protrusion of the upper rectum without eversion of the anal verge, rectal fixation to the sacral promontory without further dissection beyond the peritoneal reflection is adequate, but when extensive prolapse is associated with eversion of the anal verge, more extensive blunt dissection from the peritoneal reflection to the LAC with multiple rectopexy sutures is valid for reducing risks for recurrence and eliminating mesh-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9433537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94335372022-09-02 Case report: Gross persistent rectal prolapse. A case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing Miyano, Go Yamada, Shunsuke Murakami, Hiroshi Lane, Geoffrey J. Yamataka, Atsuyuki Front Pediatr Pediatrics A previously well 15-year-old male presented with a history of gross rectal prolapse (GRP) involving full-thickness rectal prolapse of increasing severity and incidence over 6 months that occurred with every bowel motion, varying from 10 to 40 cm. He denied constipation and passed a soft motion once daily, adeptly reducing his prolapsed rectum after each motion. This case illustrates technical challenges and planning for surgical intervention for optimal treatment in keeping with an FDA alert issued April, 2019 banning surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Preoperative fluoroscopic defecography confirmed rectal prolapse beginning with eversion of the anal verge identified on inspection. For surgery, general anesthesia was induced, he was placed in a Trendelenburg position, and four ports were inserted. The peritoneum was incised and blunt dissection used to expose the levator ani complex (LAC) taking care to prevent lateral nerve injury and preserve regional vascularity. Seven polypropylene sutures were used to fix the seromuscular posterior wall of the rectum to the median raphe of the LAC, the presacral fascia, and the periosteum of the sacral promontory. Operative time was 170 min. Postoperative recovery and progress were unremarkable. Currently, 5 years postoperatively, defecation is regular without recurrence of prolapse. For prolapse involving protrusion of the upper rectum without eversion of the anal verge, rectal fixation to the sacral promontory without further dissection beyond the peritoneal reflection is adequate, but when extensive prolapse is associated with eversion of the anal verge, more extensive blunt dissection from the peritoneal reflection to the LAC with multiple rectopexy sutures is valid for reducing risks for recurrence and eliminating mesh-related complications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9433537/ /pubmed/36061389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.900081 Text en Copyright © 2022 Miyano, Yamada, Murakami, Lane and Yamataka. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Miyano, Go
Yamada, Shunsuke
Murakami, Hiroshi
Lane, Geoffrey J.
Yamataka, Atsuyuki
Case report: Gross persistent rectal prolapse. A case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing
title Case report: Gross persistent rectal prolapse. A case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing
title_full Case report: Gross persistent rectal prolapse. A case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing
title_fullStr Case report: Gross persistent rectal prolapse. A case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing
title_full_unstemmed Case report: Gross persistent rectal prolapse. A case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing
title_short Case report: Gross persistent rectal prolapse. A case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing
title_sort case report: gross persistent rectal prolapse. a case treated without mesh using deep retrorectal dissection/suturing
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.900081
work_keys_str_mv AT miyanogo casereportgrosspersistentrectalprolapseacasetreatedwithoutmeshusingdeepretrorectaldissectionsuturing
AT yamadashunsuke casereportgrosspersistentrectalprolapseacasetreatedwithoutmeshusingdeepretrorectaldissectionsuturing
AT murakamihiroshi casereportgrosspersistentrectalprolapseacasetreatedwithoutmeshusingdeepretrorectaldissectionsuturing
AT lanegeoffreyj casereportgrosspersistentrectalprolapseacasetreatedwithoutmeshusingdeepretrorectaldissectionsuturing
AT yamatakaatsuyuki casereportgrosspersistentrectalprolapseacasetreatedwithoutmeshusingdeepretrorectaldissectionsuturing