Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry

BACKGROUND: While the importance of invasive physiological assessment (IPA) to choose coronary lesions to be treated is ascertained, its role after PCI is less established. We evaluated feasibility and efficacy of Physiology-guided PCI in the everyday practice in a retrospective registry performed i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leone, Antonio Maria, Migliaro, Stefano, Zimbardo, Giuseppe, Cialdella, Pio, Basile, Eloisa, Galante, Domenico, Di Giusto, Federico, Anastasia, Gianluca, Vicere, Andrea, Petrolati, Edoardo, Di Stefano, Antonio, Campaniello, Giorgia, D’Amario, Domenico, Vergallo, Rocco, Montone, Rocco Antonio, Buffon, Antonino, Romagnoli, Enrico, Aurigemma, Cristina, Burzotta, Francesco, Trani, Carlo, Crea, Filippo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061555
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.983003
_version_ 1784780683226382336
author Leone, Antonio Maria
Migliaro, Stefano
Zimbardo, Giuseppe
Cialdella, Pio
Basile, Eloisa
Galante, Domenico
Di Giusto, Federico
Anastasia, Gianluca
Vicere, Andrea
Petrolati, Edoardo
Di Stefano, Antonio
Campaniello, Giorgia
D’Amario, Domenico
Vergallo, Rocco
Montone, Rocco Antonio
Buffon, Antonino
Romagnoli, Enrico
Aurigemma, Cristina
Burzotta, Francesco
Trani, Carlo
Crea, Filippo
author_facet Leone, Antonio Maria
Migliaro, Stefano
Zimbardo, Giuseppe
Cialdella, Pio
Basile, Eloisa
Galante, Domenico
Di Giusto, Federico
Anastasia, Gianluca
Vicere, Andrea
Petrolati, Edoardo
Di Stefano, Antonio
Campaniello, Giorgia
D’Amario, Domenico
Vergallo, Rocco
Montone, Rocco Antonio
Buffon, Antonino
Romagnoli, Enrico
Aurigemma, Cristina
Burzotta, Francesco
Trani, Carlo
Crea, Filippo
author_sort Leone, Antonio Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the importance of invasive physiological assessment (IPA) to choose coronary lesions to be treated is ascertained, its role after PCI is less established. We evaluated feasibility and efficacy of Physiology-guided PCI in the everyday practice in a retrospective registry performed in a single high-volume and “physiology-believer” center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PROPHET-FFR study (NCT05056662) patients undergoing an IPA in 2015–2020 were retrospectively enrolled in three groups: Control group comprising patients for whom PCI was deferred based on a IPA; Angiography-Guided PCI group comprising patients undergoing PCI based on an IPA but without a post-PCI IPA; Physiology-guided PCI group comprising patients undergoing PCI based on an IPA and an IPA after PCI, followed by a physiology-guided optimization, if indicated. Optimal result was defined by an FFR value ≥ 0.90. RESULTS: A total of 1,322 patients with 1,591 lesions were available for the analysis. 893 patients (67.5%) in Control Group, 249 patients (18.8%) in Angiography-guided PCI Group and 180 patients (13.6%) in Physiology-guided PCI group. In 89 patients a suboptimal functional result was achieved that was optimized in 22 cases leading to a “Final FFR” value of 0.90 ± 0.04 in Angiography-Guided PCI group. Procedural time, costs, and rate of complications were similar. At follow up the rate of MACEs for the Physiology-guided PCI group was similar to the Control Group (7.2% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.765) and significantly lower than the Angiography-guided PCI Group (14.9%, p < 0.001), mainly driven by a reduction in TVRs. CONCLUSION: “Physiology-guided PCI” is a feasible strategy with a favorable impact on mid-term prognosis. Prospective studies using a standardized IPA are warrant to confirm these data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9433711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94337112022-09-02 Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry Leone, Antonio Maria Migliaro, Stefano Zimbardo, Giuseppe Cialdella, Pio Basile, Eloisa Galante, Domenico Di Giusto, Federico Anastasia, Gianluca Vicere, Andrea Petrolati, Edoardo Di Stefano, Antonio Campaniello, Giorgia D’Amario, Domenico Vergallo, Rocco Montone, Rocco Antonio Buffon, Antonino Romagnoli, Enrico Aurigemma, Cristina Burzotta, Francesco Trani, Carlo Crea, Filippo Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: While the importance of invasive physiological assessment (IPA) to choose coronary lesions to be treated is ascertained, its role after PCI is less established. We evaluated feasibility and efficacy of Physiology-guided PCI in the everyday practice in a retrospective registry performed in a single high-volume and “physiology-believer” center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PROPHET-FFR study (NCT05056662) patients undergoing an IPA in 2015–2020 were retrospectively enrolled in three groups: Control group comprising patients for whom PCI was deferred based on a IPA; Angiography-Guided PCI group comprising patients undergoing PCI based on an IPA but without a post-PCI IPA; Physiology-guided PCI group comprising patients undergoing PCI based on an IPA and an IPA after PCI, followed by a physiology-guided optimization, if indicated. Optimal result was defined by an FFR value ≥ 0.90. RESULTS: A total of 1,322 patients with 1,591 lesions were available for the analysis. 893 patients (67.5%) in Control Group, 249 patients (18.8%) in Angiography-guided PCI Group and 180 patients (13.6%) in Physiology-guided PCI group. In 89 patients a suboptimal functional result was achieved that was optimized in 22 cases leading to a “Final FFR” value of 0.90 ± 0.04 in Angiography-Guided PCI group. Procedural time, costs, and rate of complications were similar. At follow up the rate of MACEs for the Physiology-guided PCI group was similar to the Control Group (7.2% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.765) and significantly lower than the Angiography-guided PCI Group (14.9%, p < 0.001), mainly driven by a reduction in TVRs. CONCLUSION: “Physiology-guided PCI” is a feasible strategy with a favorable impact on mid-term prognosis. Prospective studies using a standardized IPA are warrant to confirm these data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9433711/ /pubmed/36061555 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.983003 Text en Copyright © 2022 Leone, Migliaro, Zimbardo, Cialdella, Basile, Galante, Di Giusto, Anastasia, Vicere, Petrolati, Di Stefano, Campaniello, D’Amario, Vergallo, Montone, Buffon, Romagnoli, Aurigemma, Burzotta, Trani and Crea. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Leone, Antonio Maria
Migliaro, Stefano
Zimbardo, Giuseppe
Cialdella, Pio
Basile, Eloisa
Galante, Domenico
Di Giusto, Federico
Anastasia, Gianluca
Vicere, Andrea
Petrolati, Edoardo
Di Stefano, Antonio
Campaniello, Giorgia
D’Amario, Domenico
Vergallo, Rocco
Montone, Rocco Antonio
Buffon, Antonino
Romagnoli, Enrico
Aurigemma, Cristina
Burzotta, Francesco
Trani, Carlo
Crea, Filippo
Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry
title Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry
title_full Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry
title_fullStr Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry
title_full_unstemmed Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry
title_short Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry
title_sort safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061555
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.983003
work_keys_str_mv AT leoneantoniomaria safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT migliarostefano safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT zimbardogiuseppe safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT cialdellapio safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT basileeloisa safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT galantedomenico safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT digiustofederico safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT anastasiagianluca safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT vicereandrea safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT petrolatiedoardo safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT distefanoantonio safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT campaniellogiorgia safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT damariodomenico safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT vergallorocco safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT montoneroccoantonio safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT buffonantonino safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT romagnolienrico safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT aurigemmacristina safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT burzottafrancesco safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT tranicarlo safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry
AT creafilippo safetyandeffectivenessofpostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionphysiologicalassessmentretrospectivedatafromthepostrevascularizationoptimizationandphysiologicalevaluationofintermediatelesionsusingfractionalflowreserveregistry