Cargando…

Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia and related disorders are highly disabling and create substantial burdens for families, communities, and health care systems. Although pharmacological treatments can often lessen the psychotic symptoms that are a hallmark of schizophrenia, they do not lessen the social and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schutt, Russell K., Xi, Haiyi, Mueser, Kim T., Killam, Matthew A., Delman, Jonathan, Eack, Shaun M., Mesholam-Gately, Raquelle, Pratt, Sarah I., Sandoval, Luis, Santos, Meghan M., Golden, Laura R., Keshavan, Matcheri S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36050663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04149-x
_version_ 1784780880618717184
author Schutt, Russell K.
Xi, Haiyi
Mueser, Kim T.
Killam, Matthew A.
Delman, Jonathan
Eack, Shaun M.
Mesholam-Gately, Raquelle
Pratt, Sarah I.
Sandoval, Luis
Santos, Meghan M.
Golden, Laura R.
Keshavan, Matcheri S.
author_facet Schutt, Russell K.
Xi, Haiyi
Mueser, Kim T.
Killam, Matthew A.
Delman, Jonathan
Eack, Shaun M.
Mesholam-Gately, Raquelle
Pratt, Sarah I.
Sandoval, Luis
Santos, Meghan M.
Golden, Laura R.
Keshavan, Matcheri S.
author_sort Schutt, Russell K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia and related disorders are highly disabling and create substantial burdens for families, communities, and health care systems. Although pharmacological treatments can often lessen the psychotic symptoms that are a hallmark of schizophrenia, they do not lessen the social and cognitive deficits that create the greatest impediments to community engagement and functional recovery. This study builds on prior research on psychosocial rehabilitation by comparing the effectiveness of two treatments demonstrated as efficacious in improving social and community functioning, Cognitive Enhancement Therapy (CET) and a version of Social Skills Training (HOPES/SST). METHODS: The study uses a randomized cluster design in which a pair of clinicians at community- and hospital-based mental service centers deliver either CET or HOPES to at least one group of 6-8 eligible clients for 12 months. Clinicians are trained and then supervised weekly, with ongoing process measurement of treatment fidelity, attendance, satisfaction, and retention, and use of other services. Measures administered at baseline and at 6 and 12 months while in treatment, and then at 18 and 24 months after treatment include social adjustment, quality of life, social skills, positive and negative symptoms, and neuro- and social cognition. We hypothesize that CET will be associated with greater improvements than SST in both the primary outcome of community functioning and the secondary outcomes of neuro- and social cognition and social skills. Secondarily, we hypothesize that more cognitive impairment at baseline and younger age will predict more benefit from CET compared to HOPES. DISCUSSION: Resource shortages endemic in mental health services and exacerbated by the pandemic highlight the importance of identifying the most effective approach to improving social and community functioning. We aim to improve understanding of the impact of two efficacious psychosocial treatments and to improve clinicians’ ability to refer to both treatments the individuals who are most likely to benefit from them. We expect the result to be programmatic improvements that improve the magnitude and durability of gains in community functioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04321759, registered March 25, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9434502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94345022022-09-01 Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation Schutt, Russell K. Xi, Haiyi Mueser, Kim T. Killam, Matthew A. Delman, Jonathan Eack, Shaun M. Mesholam-Gately, Raquelle Pratt, Sarah I. Sandoval, Luis Santos, Meghan M. Golden, Laura R. Keshavan, Matcheri S. BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia and related disorders are highly disabling and create substantial burdens for families, communities, and health care systems. Although pharmacological treatments can often lessen the psychotic symptoms that are a hallmark of schizophrenia, they do not lessen the social and cognitive deficits that create the greatest impediments to community engagement and functional recovery. This study builds on prior research on psychosocial rehabilitation by comparing the effectiveness of two treatments demonstrated as efficacious in improving social and community functioning, Cognitive Enhancement Therapy (CET) and a version of Social Skills Training (HOPES/SST). METHODS: The study uses a randomized cluster design in which a pair of clinicians at community- and hospital-based mental service centers deliver either CET or HOPES to at least one group of 6-8 eligible clients for 12 months. Clinicians are trained and then supervised weekly, with ongoing process measurement of treatment fidelity, attendance, satisfaction, and retention, and use of other services. Measures administered at baseline and at 6 and 12 months while in treatment, and then at 18 and 24 months after treatment include social adjustment, quality of life, social skills, positive and negative symptoms, and neuro- and social cognition. We hypothesize that CET will be associated with greater improvements than SST in both the primary outcome of community functioning and the secondary outcomes of neuro- and social cognition and social skills. Secondarily, we hypothesize that more cognitive impairment at baseline and younger age will predict more benefit from CET compared to HOPES. DISCUSSION: Resource shortages endemic in mental health services and exacerbated by the pandemic highlight the importance of identifying the most effective approach to improving social and community functioning. We aim to improve understanding of the impact of two efficacious psychosocial treatments and to improve clinicians’ ability to refer to both treatments the individuals who are most likely to benefit from them. We expect the result to be programmatic improvements that improve the magnitude and durability of gains in community functioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04321759, registered March 25, 2020. BioMed Central 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9434502/ /pubmed/36050663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04149-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schutt, Russell K.
Xi, Haiyi
Mueser, Kim T.
Killam, Matthew A.
Delman, Jonathan
Eack, Shaun M.
Mesholam-Gately, Raquelle
Pratt, Sarah I.
Sandoval, Luis
Santos, Meghan M.
Golden, Laura R.
Keshavan, Matcheri S.
Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation
title Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation
title_full Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation
title_fullStr Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation
title_short Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation
title_sort cognitive enhancement therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36050663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04149-x
work_keys_str_mv AT schuttrussellk cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT xihaiyi cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT mueserkimt cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT killammatthewa cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT delmanjonathan cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT eackshaunm cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT mesholamgatelyraquelle cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT prattsarahi cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT sandovalluis cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT santosmeghanm cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT goldenlaurar cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation
AT keshavanmatcheris cognitiveenhancementtherapyvssocialskillstraininginschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessevaluation