Cargando…

The potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence

Sustainability reporting is very important for upstream oil and gas companies. The characteristics of industrial operations require direct involvement in environmental management, which causes better policies. Therefore, it is important to explain that these companies are motivated by ecological awa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwarto, Febrian, Nurafiah, Nunuy, Suharman, Harry, Dahlan, Muhammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434532/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00292-7
_version_ 1784780889868206080
author Kwarto, Febrian
Nurafiah, Nunuy
Suharman, Harry
Dahlan, Muhammad
author_facet Kwarto, Febrian
Nurafiah, Nunuy
Suharman, Harry
Dahlan, Muhammad
author_sort Kwarto, Febrian
collection PubMed
description Sustainability reporting is very important for upstream oil and gas companies. The characteristics of industrial operations require direct involvement in environmental management, which causes better policies. Therefore, it is important to explain that these companies are motivated by ecological awareness or a specific purpose. This research conducts critical discourse analysis with a systematic literature review (SLR) approach of the last eleven years related to the sustainability reporting of the oil and gas industry. Various factors influence companies when implementing sustainability reporting, such as increasing credibility, maintaining reputation, transparency, and avoiding legal sanctions. The results showed several global upstream oil and gas companies still have the potential bias for sustainability reporting because they have not implemented the triple bottom line concept. This potential bias is related to irregularities and fraud in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practice. However, the organization as a ruling group can still carry out its mission of hegemony in the environment and the surrounding community. This research contributes academically and practically because it discusses various studies that used several methods, including surveys, case studies, experiments, and literature to form its conclusions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11301-022-00292-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9434532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94345322022-09-01 The potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence Kwarto, Febrian Nurafiah, Nunuy Suharman, Harry Dahlan, Muhammad Manag Rev Q Article Sustainability reporting is very important for upstream oil and gas companies. The characteristics of industrial operations require direct involvement in environmental management, which causes better policies. Therefore, it is important to explain that these companies are motivated by ecological awareness or a specific purpose. This research conducts critical discourse analysis with a systematic literature review (SLR) approach of the last eleven years related to the sustainability reporting of the oil and gas industry. Various factors influence companies when implementing sustainability reporting, such as increasing credibility, maintaining reputation, transparency, and avoiding legal sanctions. The results showed several global upstream oil and gas companies still have the potential bias for sustainability reporting because they have not implemented the triple bottom line concept. This potential bias is related to irregularities and fraud in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practice. However, the organization as a ruling group can still carry out its mission of hegemony in the environment and the surrounding community. This research contributes academically and practically because it discusses various studies that used several methods, including surveys, case studies, experiments, and literature to form its conclusions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11301-022-00292-7. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9434532/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00292-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Kwarto, Febrian
Nurafiah, Nunuy
Suharman, Harry
Dahlan, Muhammad
The potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence
title The potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence
title_full The potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence
title_fullStr The potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed The potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence
title_short The potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence
title_sort potential bias for sustainability reporting of global upstream oil and gas companies: a systematic literature review of the evidence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434532/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00292-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kwartofebrian thepotentialbiasforsustainabilityreportingofglobalupstreamoilandgascompaniesasystematicliteraturereviewoftheevidence
AT nurafiahnunuy thepotentialbiasforsustainabilityreportingofglobalupstreamoilandgascompaniesasystematicliteraturereviewoftheevidence
AT suharmanharry thepotentialbiasforsustainabilityreportingofglobalupstreamoilandgascompaniesasystematicliteraturereviewoftheevidence
AT dahlanmuhammad thepotentialbiasforsustainabilityreportingofglobalupstreamoilandgascompaniesasystematicliteraturereviewoftheevidence
AT kwartofebrian potentialbiasforsustainabilityreportingofglobalupstreamoilandgascompaniesasystematicliteraturereviewoftheevidence
AT nurafiahnunuy potentialbiasforsustainabilityreportingofglobalupstreamoilandgascompaniesasystematicliteraturereviewoftheevidence
AT suharmanharry potentialbiasforsustainabilityreportingofglobalupstreamoilandgascompaniesasystematicliteraturereviewoftheevidence
AT dahlanmuhammad potentialbiasforsustainabilityreportingofglobalupstreamoilandgascompaniesasystematicliteraturereviewoftheevidence