Cargando…

Concomitant treatment with insulin and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors was associated with the renal composite outcome in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: A propensity score‐matched analysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We previously reported that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) treatment was associated with an improvement of the albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. The present study clarified how concomitant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toyoda, Masao, Saito, Nobumichi, Kimura, Moritsugu, Hatori, Nobuo, Tamura, Kouichi, Miyakawa, Masaaki, Sato, Kazuyoshi, Kanamori, Akira, Kobayashi, Kazuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13825
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We previously reported that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) treatment was associated with an improvement of the albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. The present study clarified how concomitant insulin treatment (IT) with SGLT2i therapy influences the renal composite outcome (RCO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 624 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease who underwent SGLT2i treatment. The renal composite outcome was set as progression of the stage of albuminuria or a ≥15% decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate per year. We developed a cohort model of patients managed with and without IT (Ins [+], Ins [−]) using propensity score matching methods. Furthermore, all patients in our study population were stratified into quintiles according to their propensity score. RESULTS: The incidence of the RCO was in Ins (+) patients significantly higher than that in Ins (−) (P = 0.033). The estimated hazard ratio for the RCO was 1.55 (P = 0.035) in Ins (+) patients. The change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio in the groups was not statistically significant. The analysis, which was based on the quintiles, showed a statistically significant difference between the Ins (+) and Ins (−) groups (P = 0.01); the odds ratio for the RCO in patients managed with IT was 2.20 (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant administration of IT with SGLT2is influenced the RCO in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. We might need to consider the influence of concomitant agents on the renoprotective effects of SGLT2i therapy.