Cargando…

A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection

[Image: see text] Predicting asphaltene onset pressure (AOP) and bubble point pressure (Pb) is essential for optimization of gas injection for enhanced oil recovery. Pressure-Volume-Temperature or PVT studies along with equations of state (EoSs) are widely used to predict AOP and Pb. However, PVT ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tazikeh, Simin, Davoudi, Abdollah, Shafiei, Ali, Parsaei, Hossein, Atabaev, Timur Sh., Ivakhnenko, Oleksandr P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03192
_version_ 1784780914762448896
author Tazikeh, Simin
Davoudi, Abdollah
Shafiei, Ali
Parsaei, Hossein
Atabaev, Timur Sh.
Ivakhnenko, Oleksandr P.
author_facet Tazikeh, Simin
Davoudi, Abdollah
Shafiei, Ali
Parsaei, Hossein
Atabaev, Timur Sh.
Ivakhnenko, Oleksandr P.
author_sort Tazikeh, Simin
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Predicting asphaltene onset pressure (AOP) and bubble point pressure (Pb) is essential for optimization of gas injection for enhanced oil recovery. Pressure-Volume-Temperature or PVT studies along with equations of state (EoSs) are widely used to predict AOP and Pb. However, PVT experiments are costly and time-consuming. The perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory or PC-SAFT is a sophisticated EoS used for prediction of the AOP and Pb. However, this method is computationally complex and has high data requirements. Hence, developing precise and reliable smart models for prediction of the AOP and Pb is inevitable. In this paper, we used machine learning (ML) methods to develop predictive tools for the estimation of the AOP and Pb using experimental data (AOP data set: 170 samples; Pb data set: 146 samples). Extra trees (ET), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, and k-nearest neighbors ML methods were used. Reservoir temperature, reservoir pressure, SARA fraction, API gravity, gas–oil ratio, fluid molecular weight, monophasic composition, and composition of gas injection are considered as input data. The ET (R(2): 0.793, RMSE: 7.5) and the SVM models (R(2): 0.988, RMSE: 0.76) attained more reliable results for estimation of the AOP and Pb, respectively. Generally, the accuracy of the PC-SAFT model is higher than that of the AI/ML models. However, our results confirm that the AI/ML approach is an acceptable alternative for the PC-SAFT model when we face lack of data and/or complex mathematical equations. The developed smart models are accurate and fast and produce reliable results with lower data requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9434618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94346182022-09-02 A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection Tazikeh, Simin Davoudi, Abdollah Shafiei, Ali Parsaei, Hossein Atabaev, Timur Sh. Ivakhnenko, Oleksandr P. ACS Omega [Image: see text] Predicting asphaltene onset pressure (AOP) and bubble point pressure (Pb) is essential for optimization of gas injection for enhanced oil recovery. Pressure-Volume-Temperature or PVT studies along with equations of state (EoSs) are widely used to predict AOP and Pb. However, PVT experiments are costly and time-consuming. The perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory or PC-SAFT is a sophisticated EoS used for prediction of the AOP and Pb. However, this method is computationally complex and has high data requirements. Hence, developing precise and reliable smart models for prediction of the AOP and Pb is inevitable. In this paper, we used machine learning (ML) methods to develop predictive tools for the estimation of the AOP and Pb using experimental data (AOP data set: 170 samples; Pb data set: 146 samples). Extra trees (ET), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, and k-nearest neighbors ML methods were used. Reservoir temperature, reservoir pressure, SARA fraction, API gravity, gas–oil ratio, fluid molecular weight, monophasic composition, and composition of gas injection are considered as input data. The ET (R(2): 0.793, RMSE: 7.5) and the SVM models (R(2): 0.988, RMSE: 0.76) attained more reliable results for estimation of the AOP and Pb, respectively. Generally, the accuracy of the PC-SAFT model is higher than that of the AI/ML models. However, our results confirm that the AI/ML approach is an acceptable alternative for the PC-SAFT model when we face lack of data and/or complex mathematical equations. The developed smart models are accurate and fast and produce reliable results with lower data requirements. American Chemical Society 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9434618/ /pubmed/36061711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03192 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Tazikeh, Simin
Davoudi, Abdollah
Shafiei, Ali
Parsaei, Hossein
Atabaev, Timur Sh.
Ivakhnenko, Oleksandr P.
A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection
title A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection
title_full A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection
title_fullStr A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection
title_short A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection
title_sort comparison between the perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory equation of state and machine learning modeling approaches in asphaltene onset pressure and bubble point pressure prediction during gas injection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36061711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03192
work_keys_str_mv AT tazikehsimin acomparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT davoudiabdollah acomparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT shafieiali acomparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT parsaeihossein acomparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT atabaevtimursh acomparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT ivakhnenkooleksandrp acomparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT tazikehsimin comparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT davoudiabdollah comparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT shafieiali comparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT parsaeihossein comparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT atabaevtimursh comparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection
AT ivakhnenkooleksandrp comparisonbetweentheperturbedchainstatisticalassociatingfluidtheoryequationofstateandmachinelearningmodelingapproachesinasphalteneonsetpressureandbubblepointpressurepredictionduringgasinjection