Cargando…
S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity
BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9435359/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.048 |
_version_ | 1784781117501472768 |
---|---|
author | Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna Bengoechea, Enrique García |
author_facet | Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna Bengoechea, Enrique García |
author_sort | Woods, Catherine B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organisations, a policy audit of four European countries, and systematic reviews of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops where quantitative and qualitative data alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualised as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development, and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ (GPS) or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain concludes the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI GPS will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9435359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94353592022-09-01 S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna Bengoechea, Enrique García Eur J Public Health Symposium BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organisations, a policy audit of four European countries, and systematic reviews of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops where quantitative and qualitative data alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualised as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development, and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ (GPS) or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain concludes the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI GPS will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity. Oxford University Press 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9435359/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.048 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna Bengoechea, Enrique García S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title | S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_full | S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_fullStr | S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_full_unstemmed | S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_short | S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_sort | s09-4 the development of the physical activity environment policy index (pa-epi): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
topic | Symposium |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9435359/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodscatherineb s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT kellyliam s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT volfkevin s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT geliuspeter s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT messingsven s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT forbergersarah s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT lakerveldjeroen s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT denbravernicoletter s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT zukowskajoanna s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT bengoecheaenriquegarcia s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity |