Cargando…

S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity

BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Catherine B, Kelly, Liam, Volf, Kevin, Gelius, Peter, Messing, Sven, Forberger, Sarah, Lakerveld, Jeroen, den Braver, Nicolette R, Zukowska, Joanna, Bengoechea, Enrique García
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9435359/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.048
_version_ 1784781117501472768
author Woods, Catherine B
Kelly, Liam
Volf, Kevin
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Lakerveld, Jeroen
den Braver, Nicolette R
Zukowska, Joanna
Bengoechea, Enrique García
author_facet Woods, Catherine B
Kelly, Liam
Volf, Kevin
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Lakerveld, Jeroen
den Braver, Nicolette R
Zukowska, Joanna
Bengoechea, Enrique García
author_sort Woods, Catherine B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organisations, a policy audit of four European countries, and systematic reviews of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops where quantitative and qualitative data alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualised as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development, and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ (GPS) or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain concludes the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI GPS will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9435359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94353592022-09-01 S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna Bengoechea, Enrique García Eur J Public Health Symposium BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organisations, a policy audit of four European countries, and systematic reviews of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops where quantitative and qualitative data alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualised as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development, and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ (GPS) or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain concludes the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI GPS will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity. Oxford University Press 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9435359/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.048 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposium
Woods, Catherine B
Kelly, Liam
Volf, Kevin
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Lakerveld, Jeroen
den Braver, Nicolette R
Zukowska, Joanna
Bengoechea, Enrique García
S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_full S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_fullStr S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_full_unstemmed S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_short S09-4 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_sort s09-4 the development of the physical activity environment policy index (pa-epi): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity
topic Symposium
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9435359/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.048
work_keys_str_mv AT woodscatherineb s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT kellyliam s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT volfkevin s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT geliuspeter s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT messingsven s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT forbergersarah s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT lakerveldjeroen s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT denbravernicoletter s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT zukowskajoanna s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT bengoecheaenriquegarcia s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT s094thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity