Cargando…

Microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is reported to induce irritating skin sensations and occasional skin injuries, which limits the applied tDCS dose. Additionally, tDCS hardware safety profile prevents high current delivery when skin resistance is high. OBJECTIVE: To test if...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chhatbar, P. Y., Liu, S., Ramakrishnan, V., George, M. S., Kautz, S. A., Feng, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9435456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.76
_version_ 1784781149706387456
author Chhatbar, P. Y.
Liu, S.
Ramakrishnan, V.
George, M. S.
Kautz, S. A.
Feng, W.
author_facet Chhatbar, P. Y.
Liu, S.
Ramakrishnan, V.
George, M. S.
Kautz, S. A.
Feng, W.
author_sort Chhatbar, P. Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is reported to induce irritating skin sensations and occasional skin injuries, which limits the applied tDCS dose. Additionally, tDCS hardware safety profile prevents high current delivery when skin resistance is high. OBJECTIVE: To test if decreasing skin resistance can enable high‐dose tDCS delivery without increasing tDCS‐related skin sensations or device hardware limits. METHODS: We compared the effect of microdermabrasion and sonication on 2 mA direct current stimulation (DCS) through forearm skin for 2–3 min on 20 subjects. We also surveyed the subjects using a questionnaire throughout the procedure. We used a linear mixed‐effects model for repeated‐measures and multiple logistic regression, with adjustments for age, race, gender and visit. RESULTS: Microdermabrasion, with/out sonication, led to significant decrease in skin resistance (1.6 ± 0.1 kΩ or ∼32% decrease, p < 0.0001). The decrease with sonication alone (0.4 ± 0.1 kΩ or ∼7% decrease, p = 0.0016) was comparable to that of sham (0.3 ± 0.1 kΩ or ∼5% decrease, p = 0.0414). There was no increase in the skin–electrode interface temperature. The perceived DCS‐related sensations did not differ across skin preparation procedures (p > 0.16), but microdermabrasion (when not combined with sonication) led to increased perceived sensation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Microdermabrasion (with/out sonication) resulted in reduced skin resistance without increase in perceived skin sensations with DCS. Higher current can be delivered with microdermabrasion‐pre‐treated skin without changing the device hardware while reducing, otherwise higher voltage required to deliver the same amount of current.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9435456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94354562022-09-08 Microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance Chhatbar, P. Y. Liu, S. Ramakrishnan, V. George, M. S. Kautz, S. A. Feng, W. Skin Health Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is reported to induce irritating skin sensations and occasional skin injuries, which limits the applied tDCS dose. Additionally, tDCS hardware safety profile prevents high current delivery when skin resistance is high. OBJECTIVE: To test if decreasing skin resistance can enable high‐dose tDCS delivery without increasing tDCS‐related skin sensations or device hardware limits. METHODS: We compared the effect of microdermabrasion and sonication on 2 mA direct current stimulation (DCS) through forearm skin for 2–3 min on 20 subjects. We also surveyed the subjects using a questionnaire throughout the procedure. We used a linear mixed‐effects model for repeated‐measures and multiple logistic regression, with adjustments for age, race, gender and visit. RESULTS: Microdermabrasion, with/out sonication, led to significant decrease in skin resistance (1.6 ± 0.1 kΩ or ∼32% decrease, p < 0.0001). The decrease with sonication alone (0.4 ± 0.1 kΩ or ∼7% decrease, p = 0.0016) was comparable to that of sham (0.3 ± 0.1 kΩ or ∼5% decrease, p = 0.0414). There was no increase in the skin–electrode interface temperature. The perceived DCS‐related sensations did not differ across skin preparation procedures (p > 0.16), but microdermabrasion (when not combined with sonication) led to increased perceived sensation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Microdermabrasion (with/out sonication) resulted in reduced skin resistance without increase in perceived skin sensations with DCS. Higher current can be delivered with microdermabrasion‐pre‐treated skin without changing the device hardware while reducing, otherwise higher voltage required to deliver the same amount of current. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9435456/ /pubmed/36092266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.76 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chhatbar, P. Y.
Liu, S.
Ramakrishnan, V.
George, M. S.
Kautz, S. A.
Feng, W.
Microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance
title Microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance
title_full Microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance
title_fullStr Microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance
title_full_unstemmed Microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance
title_short Microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance
title_sort microdermabrasion facilitates direct current stimulation by lowering skin resistance
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9435456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.76
work_keys_str_mv AT chhatbarpy microdermabrasionfacilitatesdirectcurrentstimulationbyloweringskinresistance
AT lius microdermabrasionfacilitatesdirectcurrentstimulationbyloweringskinresistance
AT ramakrishnanv microdermabrasionfacilitatesdirectcurrentstimulationbyloweringskinresistance
AT georgems microdermabrasionfacilitatesdirectcurrentstimulationbyloweringskinresistance
AT kautzsa microdermabrasionfacilitatesdirectcurrentstimulationbyloweringskinresistance
AT fengw microdermabrasionfacilitatesdirectcurrentstimulationbyloweringskinresistance