Cargando…

Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management

PURPOSE: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) exhibits potent advantages regarding target volume coverage and protection of organs at risk, notably in the context of anatomical constraints. Nevertheless, reports concerning VMAT for the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancers (SBBC) have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quesada, Stanislas, Fenoglietto, Pascal, Gourgou, Sophie, Lemanski, Claire, Draghici, Roxana, Ailleres, Norbert, Prunaretty, Jessica, Azria, David, Bourgier, Céline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.967479
_version_ 1784781267179405312
author Quesada, Stanislas
Fenoglietto, Pascal
Gourgou, Sophie
Lemanski, Claire
Draghici, Roxana
Ailleres, Norbert
Prunaretty, Jessica
Azria, David
Bourgier, Céline
author_facet Quesada, Stanislas
Fenoglietto, Pascal
Gourgou, Sophie
Lemanski, Claire
Draghici, Roxana
Ailleres, Norbert
Prunaretty, Jessica
Azria, David
Bourgier, Céline
author_sort Quesada, Stanislas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) exhibits potent advantages regarding target volume coverage and protection of organs at risk, notably in the context of anatomical constraints. Nevertheless, reports concerning VMAT for the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancers (SBBC) have been scarce to date. As such, we conducted this observational study to assess efficacy, safety and feasibility of VMAT in SBBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 2011 to December 2017, 54 consecutive patients with SBBC with or without axillary nodes involvement underwent a treatment protocol containing radiotherapy using VMAT. A total dose (TD) of 52.2Gy in 29 fractions was delivered to breast and internal mammary chain (IMC) nodes Planning Target Volume (PTV) plus, if applicable, a TD of 49.3Gy in 29 fractions to the supra- and infra-clavicular nodes PTV and a TD of 63.22Gy in 29 fractions to tumor boost PTV. Lungs, heart, esophagus, trachea, liver, thyroid and spinal cord were considered as organs at risk. VMAT feasibility and organ at risk sparing were evaluated by treatments planning of the 20 first enrolled patients. Tolerance and patients’ outcome were prospectively monitored by acute/late toxicities records and by the analysis of overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Breast, supraclavicular nodes and boost PTV coverage was adequate with at least 98% of PTV encompassed by more than 95% of the prescribed dose. Less than 90% of IMC PTV was encompassed by 95% of the prescribed dose. Mean lung dose was 12.3Gy (range: 7.7 – 18.7); mean heart dose was 10.7Gy (range: 6.2 – 22.3). Concerning acute toxicities, only 2 patients experienced grade 3 skin toxicity (3.7%) and only 1 patient developed grade 1 pneumonitis. After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, grade 2 fibrosis and/or shrinking was observed in 5 patients (10%), and grade 3 fibrosis in 1 patients (2%). The 5-year LRFS-rate, RFS-rate and OS were 98% [95% CI= 86.12-99.70%], 96% [95% CI= 84.63-98.96%] and 100%, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9436014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94360142022-09-02 Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management Quesada, Stanislas Fenoglietto, Pascal Gourgou, Sophie Lemanski, Claire Draghici, Roxana Ailleres, Norbert Prunaretty, Jessica Azria, David Bourgier, Céline Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) exhibits potent advantages regarding target volume coverage and protection of organs at risk, notably in the context of anatomical constraints. Nevertheless, reports concerning VMAT for the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancers (SBBC) have been scarce to date. As such, we conducted this observational study to assess efficacy, safety and feasibility of VMAT in SBBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 2011 to December 2017, 54 consecutive patients with SBBC with or without axillary nodes involvement underwent a treatment protocol containing radiotherapy using VMAT. A total dose (TD) of 52.2Gy in 29 fractions was delivered to breast and internal mammary chain (IMC) nodes Planning Target Volume (PTV) plus, if applicable, a TD of 49.3Gy in 29 fractions to the supra- and infra-clavicular nodes PTV and a TD of 63.22Gy in 29 fractions to tumor boost PTV. Lungs, heart, esophagus, trachea, liver, thyroid and spinal cord were considered as organs at risk. VMAT feasibility and organ at risk sparing were evaluated by treatments planning of the 20 first enrolled patients. Tolerance and patients’ outcome were prospectively monitored by acute/late toxicities records and by the analysis of overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Breast, supraclavicular nodes and boost PTV coverage was adequate with at least 98% of PTV encompassed by more than 95% of the prescribed dose. Less than 90% of IMC PTV was encompassed by 95% of the prescribed dose. Mean lung dose was 12.3Gy (range: 7.7 – 18.7); mean heart dose was 10.7Gy (range: 6.2 – 22.3). Concerning acute toxicities, only 2 patients experienced grade 3 skin toxicity (3.7%) and only 1 patient developed grade 1 pneumonitis. After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, grade 2 fibrosis and/or shrinking was observed in 5 patients (10%), and grade 3 fibrosis in 1 patients (2%). The 5-year LRFS-rate, RFS-rate and OS were 98% [95% CI= 86.12-99.70%], 96% [95% CI= 84.63-98.96%] and 100%, respectively. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9436014/ /pubmed/36059658 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.967479 Text en Copyright © 2022 Quesada, Fenoglietto, Gourgou, Lemanski, Draghici, Ailleres, Prunaretty, Azria and Bourgier https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Quesada, Stanislas
Fenoglietto, Pascal
Gourgou, Sophie
Lemanski, Claire
Draghici, Roxana
Ailleres, Norbert
Prunaretty, Jessica
Azria, David
Bourgier, Céline
Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management
title Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management
title_full Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management
title_fullStr Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management
title_short Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management
title_sort efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.967479
work_keys_str_mv AT quesadastanislas efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement
AT fenogliettopascal efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement
AT gourgousophie efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement
AT lemanskiclaire efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement
AT draghiciroxana efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement
AT ailleresnorbert efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement
AT prunarettyjessica efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement
AT azriadavid efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement
AT bourgierceline efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancermanagement