Cargando…

Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer

We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koo, Taeryool, Cheong, Kwang-Ho, Kim, Kyubo, Park, Hae Jin, Park, Younghee, Koh, Hyeon Kang, Kim, Byoung Hyuck, Kim, Eunji, Kim, Kyung Su, Choi, Jin Hwa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36048817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273395
_version_ 1784781273375440896
author Koo, Taeryool
Cheong, Kwang-Ho
Kim, Kyubo
Park, Hae Jin
Park, Younghee
Koh, Hyeon Kang
Kim, Byoung Hyuck
Kim, Eunji
Kim, Kyung Su
Choi, Jin Hwa
author_facet Koo, Taeryool
Cheong, Kwang-Ho
Kim, Kyubo
Park, Hae Jin
Park, Younghee
Koh, Hyeon Kang
Kim, Byoung Hyuck
Kim, Eunji
Kim, Kyung Su
Choi, Jin Hwa
author_sort Koo, Taeryool
collection PubMed
description We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify expert agreements. We generated volumes with a confidence level of 80% to compare the maximum distance to each CTV in six directions. The degree of agreement was moderate; overall kappa values were 0.573 for distal EBDC, 0.513 for proximal EBDC, and 0.511 for GBC. In the distal EBDC, a larger variation was noted in the right, post, and inferior direction. In the proximal EBDC, all borders except the right and left direction showed a larger variation. In the GBC, a larger variation was found in the anterior, posterior, and inferior direction. The posterior and inferior borders were the common area having discrepancies, associated with the insufficient coverage of the paraaortic node. A consensus guideline is needed to reduce inter-clinician variability in the CTVs and adequate coverage of regional lymph node area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9436049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94360492022-09-02 Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer Koo, Taeryool Cheong, Kwang-Ho Kim, Kyubo Park, Hae Jin Park, Younghee Koh, Hyeon Kang Kim, Byoung Hyuck Kim, Eunji Kim, Kyung Su Choi, Jin Hwa PLoS One Research Article We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify expert agreements. We generated volumes with a confidence level of 80% to compare the maximum distance to each CTV in six directions. The degree of agreement was moderate; overall kappa values were 0.573 for distal EBDC, 0.513 for proximal EBDC, and 0.511 for GBC. In the distal EBDC, a larger variation was noted in the right, post, and inferior direction. In the proximal EBDC, all borders except the right and left direction showed a larger variation. In the GBC, a larger variation was found in the anterior, posterior, and inferior direction. The posterior and inferior borders were the common area having discrepancies, associated with the insufficient coverage of the paraaortic node. A consensus guideline is needed to reduce inter-clinician variability in the CTVs and adequate coverage of regional lymph node area. Public Library of Science 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9436049/ /pubmed/36048817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273395 Text en © 2022 Koo et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koo, Taeryool
Cheong, Kwang-Ho
Kim, Kyubo
Park, Hae Jin
Park, Younghee
Koh, Hyeon Kang
Kim, Byoung Hyuck
Kim, Eunji
Kim, Kyung Su
Choi, Jin Hwa
Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
title Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
title_full Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
title_fullStr Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
title_full_unstemmed Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
title_short Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
title_sort variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36048817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273395
work_keys_str_mv AT kootaeryool variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT cheongkwangho variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT kimkyubo variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT parkhaejin variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT parkyounghee variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT kohhyeonkang variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT kimbyounghyuck variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT kimeunji variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT kimkyungsu variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer
AT choijinhwa variationinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinpostoperativeradiotherapyforbiliarytractcancer