Cargando…

A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia

Biological invasions are a major cause of environmental and economic disruption. While ecological factors are key determinants of their success, the role of genetics has been more challenging to demonstrate. The colonization of Australia by the European rabbit is one of the most iconic and devastati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alves, Joel M., Carneiro, Miguel, Day, Jonathan P., Welch, John J., Duckworth, Janine A., Cox, Tarnya E., Letnic, Mike, Strive, Tanja, Ferrand, Nuno, Jiggins, Francis M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122734119
_version_ 1784781340284026880
author Alves, Joel M.
Carneiro, Miguel
Day, Jonathan P.
Welch, John J.
Duckworth, Janine A.
Cox, Tarnya E.
Letnic, Mike
Strive, Tanja
Ferrand, Nuno
Jiggins, Francis M.
author_facet Alves, Joel M.
Carneiro, Miguel
Day, Jonathan P.
Welch, John J.
Duckworth, Janine A.
Cox, Tarnya E.
Letnic, Mike
Strive, Tanja
Ferrand, Nuno
Jiggins, Francis M.
author_sort Alves, Joel M.
collection PubMed
description Biological invasions are a major cause of environmental and economic disruption. While ecological factors are key determinants of their success, the role of genetics has been more challenging to demonstrate. The colonization of Australia by the European rabbit is one of the most iconic and devastating biological invasions in recorded history. Here, we show that despite numerous introductions over a 70-y period, this invasion was triggered by a single release of a few animals that spread thousands of kilometers across the continent. We found genetic support for historical accounts that these were English rabbits imported in 1859 by a settler named Thomas Austin and traced the origin of the invasive population back to his birthplace in England. We also find evidence of additional introductions that established local populations but have not spread geographically. Combining genomic and historical data we show that, contrary to the earlier introductions, which consisted mostly of domestic animals, the invasive rabbits had wild ancestry. In New Zealand and Tasmania, rabbits also became a pest several decades after being introduced. We argue that the common denominator of these invasions was the arrival of a new genotype that was better adapted to the natural environment. These findings demonstrate how the genetic composition of invasive individuals can determine the success of an introduction and provide a mechanism by which multiple introductions can be required for a biological invasion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9436340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94363402023-02-22 A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia Alves, Joel M. Carneiro, Miguel Day, Jonathan P. Welch, John J. Duckworth, Janine A. Cox, Tarnya E. Letnic, Mike Strive, Tanja Ferrand, Nuno Jiggins, Francis M. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Biological invasions are a major cause of environmental and economic disruption. While ecological factors are key determinants of their success, the role of genetics has been more challenging to demonstrate. The colonization of Australia by the European rabbit is one of the most iconic and devastating biological invasions in recorded history. Here, we show that despite numerous introductions over a 70-y period, this invasion was triggered by a single release of a few animals that spread thousands of kilometers across the continent. We found genetic support for historical accounts that these were English rabbits imported in 1859 by a settler named Thomas Austin and traced the origin of the invasive population back to his birthplace in England. We also find evidence of additional introductions that established local populations but have not spread geographically. Combining genomic and historical data we show that, contrary to the earlier introductions, which consisted mostly of domestic animals, the invasive rabbits had wild ancestry. In New Zealand and Tasmania, rabbits also became a pest several decades after being introduced. We argue that the common denominator of these invasions was the arrival of a new genotype that was better adapted to the natural environment. These findings demonstrate how the genetic composition of invasive individuals can determine the success of an introduction and provide a mechanism by which multiple introductions can be required for a biological invasion. National Academy of Sciences 2022-08-22 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9436340/ /pubmed/35994668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122734119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Alves, Joel M.
Carneiro, Miguel
Day, Jonathan P.
Welch, John J.
Duckworth, Janine A.
Cox, Tarnya E.
Letnic, Mike
Strive, Tanja
Ferrand, Nuno
Jiggins, Francis M.
A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia
title A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia
title_full A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia
title_fullStr A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia
title_full_unstemmed A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia
title_short A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia
title_sort single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of australia
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122734119
work_keys_str_mv AT alvesjoelm asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT carneiromiguel asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT dayjonathanp asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT welchjohnj asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT duckworthjaninea asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT coxtarnyae asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT letnicmike asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT strivetanja asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT ferrandnuno asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT jigginsfrancism asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT alvesjoelm singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT carneiromiguel singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT dayjonathanp singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT welchjohnj singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT duckworthjaninea singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT coxtarnyae singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT letnicmike singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT strivetanja singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT ferrandnuno singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia
AT jigginsfrancism singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia