Cargando…
A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia
Biological invasions are a major cause of environmental and economic disruption. While ecological factors are key determinants of their success, the role of genetics has been more challenging to demonstrate. The colonization of Australia by the European rabbit is one of the most iconic and devastati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122734119 |
_version_ | 1784781340284026880 |
---|---|
author | Alves, Joel M. Carneiro, Miguel Day, Jonathan P. Welch, John J. Duckworth, Janine A. Cox, Tarnya E. Letnic, Mike Strive, Tanja Ferrand, Nuno Jiggins, Francis M. |
author_facet | Alves, Joel M. Carneiro, Miguel Day, Jonathan P. Welch, John J. Duckworth, Janine A. Cox, Tarnya E. Letnic, Mike Strive, Tanja Ferrand, Nuno Jiggins, Francis M. |
author_sort | Alves, Joel M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological invasions are a major cause of environmental and economic disruption. While ecological factors are key determinants of their success, the role of genetics has been more challenging to demonstrate. The colonization of Australia by the European rabbit is one of the most iconic and devastating biological invasions in recorded history. Here, we show that despite numerous introductions over a 70-y period, this invasion was triggered by a single release of a few animals that spread thousands of kilometers across the continent. We found genetic support for historical accounts that these were English rabbits imported in 1859 by a settler named Thomas Austin and traced the origin of the invasive population back to his birthplace in England. We also find evidence of additional introductions that established local populations but have not spread geographically. Combining genomic and historical data we show that, contrary to the earlier introductions, which consisted mostly of domestic animals, the invasive rabbits had wild ancestry. In New Zealand and Tasmania, rabbits also became a pest several decades after being introduced. We argue that the common denominator of these invasions was the arrival of a new genotype that was better adapted to the natural environment. These findings demonstrate how the genetic composition of invasive individuals can determine the success of an introduction and provide a mechanism by which multiple introductions can be required for a biological invasion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9436340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94363402023-02-22 A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia Alves, Joel M. Carneiro, Miguel Day, Jonathan P. Welch, John J. Duckworth, Janine A. Cox, Tarnya E. Letnic, Mike Strive, Tanja Ferrand, Nuno Jiggins, Francis M. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Biological invasions are a major cause of environmental and economic disruption. While ecological factors are key determinants of their success, the role of genetics has been more challenging to demonstrate. The colonization of Australia by the European rabbit is one of the most iconic and devastating biological invasions in recorded history. Here, we show that despite numerous introductions over a 70-y period, this invasion was triggered by a single release of a few animals that spread thousands of kilometers across the continent. We found genetic support for historical accounts that these were English rabbits imported in 1859 by a settler named Thomas Austin and traced the origin of the invasive population back to his birthplace in England. We also find evidence of additional introductions that established local populations but have not spread geographically. Combining genomic and historical data we show that, contrary to the earlier introductions, which consisted mostly of domestic animals, the invasive rabbits had wild ancestry. In New Zealand and Tasmania, rabbits also became a pest several decades after being introduced. We argue that the common denominator of these invasions was the arrival of a new genotype that was better adapted to the natural environment. These findings demonstrate how the genetic composition of invasive individuals can determine the success of an introduction and provide a mechanism by which multiple introductions can be required for a biological invasion. National Academy of Sciences 2022-08-22 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9436340/ /pubmed/35994668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122734119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Biological Sciences Alves, Joel M. Carneiro, Miguel Day, Jonathan P. Welch, John J. Duckworth, Janine A. Cox, Tarnya E. Letnic, Mike Strive, Tanja Ferrand, Nuno Jiggins, Francis M. A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia |
title | A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia |
title_full | A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia |
title_fullStr | A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia |
title_short | A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia |
title_sort | single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of australia |
topic | Biological Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122734119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvesjoelm asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT carneiromiguel asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT dayjonathanp asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT welchjohnj asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT duckworthjaninea asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT coxtarnyae asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT letnicmike asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT strivetanja asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT ferrandnuno asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT jigginsfrancism asingleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT alvesjoelm singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT carneiromiguel singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT dayjonathanp singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT welchjohnj singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT duckworthjaninea singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT coxtarnyae singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT letnicmike singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT strivetanja singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT ferrandnuno singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia AT jigginsfrancism singleintroductionofwildrabbitstriggeredthebiologicalinvasionofaustralia |