Cargando…

Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Short implants are a potential alternative to long implants for use with bone augmentation in atrophic jaws. This meta-analysis investigated the survival rate and marginal bone level (MBL) of surface-modified short vs. long implants. METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were performed fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medikeri, Raghavendra Shrishail, Pereira, Marisca Austin, Waingade, Manjushri, Navale, Shwetambari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047581
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2007340367
_version_ 1784781413739921408
author Medikeri, Raghavendra Shrishail
Pereira, Marisca Austin
Waingade, Manjushri
Navale, Shwetambari
author_facet Medikeri, Raghavendra Shrishail
Pereira, Marisca Austin
Waingade, Manjushri
Navale, Shwetambari
author_sort Medikeri, Raghavendra Shrishail
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Short implants are a potential alternative to long implants for use with bone augmentation in atrophic jaws. This meta-analysis investigated the survival rate and marginal bone level (MBL) of surface-modified short vs. long implants. METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were performed for articles published between January 2010 and June 2021. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surface-modified short and long implants that reported the survival rate with at least 1 year of follow-up were selected. Two reviewers independently extracted the data, and the risk of bias and quality of evidence were evaluated. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed regarding survival rate and MBL. RESULTS: The failure rates of surface-modified short and long implants differed significantly (risk ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46, 3.57; P<0.000). Long implants exhibited a higher survival rate than short implants (mean follow-up, 1–10 years). A significant difference was observed in mean MBL (mean difference=−0.43, 95% CI, −0.63, −0.23; P<0.000), favoring the short implants. Regarding the impact of surface treatment in short and long implants, for hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched (P=0.020) and titanium oxide fluoride-modified (P=0.050) surfaces, the survival rate differed significantly between short and long implants. The MBL differences for novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated, hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched, and dual acid-etched with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate crystal surfaces (P=0.050, P=0.020, and P<0.000, respectively) differed significantly for short vs. long implants. CONCLUSIONS: Short surface-modified implants are a potential alternative to longer implants in atrophic ridges. Long fluoride-modified and hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched implants have higher survival rates than short implants. Short implants with novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surfaces, hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched surfaces, and dual acid-etched surfaces with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate crystals showed less marginal bone loss than longer implants. Due to high heterogeneity, the MBL results should be interpreted cautiously, and better-designed RCTs should be assessed in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) Identifier: CRD42020160185
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9436640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94366402022-09-09 Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis Medikeri, Raghavendra Shrishail Pereira, Marisca Austin Waingade, Manjushri Navale, Shwetambari J Periodontal Implant Sci Review PURPOSE: Short implants are a potential alternative to long implants for use with bone augmentation in atrophic jaws. This meta-analysis investigated the survival rate and marginal bone level (MBL) of surface-modified short vs. long implants. METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were performed for articles published between January 2010 and June 2021. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surface-modified short and long implants that reported the survival rate with at least 1 year of follow-up were selected. Two reviewers independently extracted the data, and the risk of bias and quality of evidence were evaluated. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed regarding survival rate and MBL. RESULTS: The failure rates of surface-modified short and long implants differed significantly (risk ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46, 3.57; P<0.000). Long implants exhibited a higher survival rate than short implants (mean follow-up, 1–10 years). A significant difference was observed in mean MBL (mean difference=−0.43, 95% CI, −0.63, −0.23; P<0.000), favoring the short implants. Regarding the impact of surface treatment in short and long implants, for hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched (P=0.020) and titanium oxide fluoride-modified (P=0.050) surfaces, the survival rate differed significantly between short and long implants. The MBL differences for novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated, hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched, and dual acid-etched with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate crystal surfaces (P=0.050, P=0.020, and P<0.000, respectively) differed significantly for short vs. long implants. CONCLUSIONS: Short surface-modified implants are a potential alternative to longer implants in atrophic ridges. Long fluoride-modified and hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched implants have higher survival rates than short implants. Short implants with novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surfaces, hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched surfaces, and dual acid-etched surfaces with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate crystals showed less marginal bone loss than longer implants. Due to high heterogeneity, the MBL results should be interpreted cautiously, and better-designed RCTs should be assessed in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) Identifier: CRD42020160185 Korean Academy of Periodontology 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9436640/ /pubmed/36047581 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2007340367 Text en Copyright © 2022. Korean Academy of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Medikeri, Raghavendra Shrishail
Pereira, Marisca Austin
Waingade, Manjushri
Navale, Shwetambari
Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047581
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2007340367
work_keys_str_mv AT medikeriraghavendrashrishail survivalofsurfacemodifiedshortversuslongimplantsincompleteorpartiallyedentulouspatientswithafollowupof1yearormoreasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pereiramariscaaustin survivalofsurfacemodifiedshortversuslongimplantsincompleteorpartiallyedentulouspatientswithafollowupof1yearormoreasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT waingademanjushri survivalofsurfacemodifiedshortversuslongimplantsincompleteorpartiallyedentulouspatientswithafollowupof1yearormoreasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT navaleshwetambari survivalofsurfacemodifiedshortversuslongimplantsincompleteorpartiallyedentulouspatientswithafollowupof1yearormoreasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis