Cargando…

Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study

PURPOSE: Various studies have investigated 3-dimensional (3D)-printed implants using Ti-6Al-4V powder; however, multi-root 3D-printed implants have not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to explore the stability of multirooted 3D-printed implants with lattice and solid structures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jungwon, Li, Ling, Song, Hyun-Young, Son, Min-Jung, Lee, Yong-Moo, Koo, Ki-Tae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047586
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2105720286
_version_ 1784781414221217792
author Lee, Jungwon
Li, Ling
Song, Hyun-Young
Son, Min-Jung
Lee, Yong-Moo
Koo, Ki-Tae
author_facet Lee, Jungwon
Li, Ling
Song, Hyun-Young
Son, Min-Jung
Lee, Yong-Moo
Koo, Ki-Tae
author_sort Lee, Jungwon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Various studies have investigated 3-dimensional (3D)-printed implants using Ti-6Al-4V powder; however, multi-root 3D-printed implants have not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to explore the stability of multirooted 3D-printed implants with lattice and solid structures. The secondary outcomes were comparisons between the 2 types of 3D-printed implants in micro-computed tomographic and histological analyses. METHODS: Lattice- and solid-type 3D-printed implants for the left and right mandibular third premolars in beagle dogs were fabricated. Four implants in each group were placed immediately following tooth extraction. Implant stability measurement and periapical X-rays were performed every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Peri-implant bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured by micro-computed tomography. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were measured in histomorphometric analyses. RESULTS: All 4 lattice-type 3D-printed implants survived. Three solid-type 3D-printed implants were removed before the planned sacrifice date due to implant mobility. A slight, gradual increase in implant stability values from implant surgery to 4 weeks after surgery was observed in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. The marginal bone change of the surviving solid-type 3D-printed implant was approximately 5 mm, whereas the value was approximately 2 mm in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. BV/TV and BMD in the lattice type 3D-printed implants were similar to those in the surviving solid-type implant. However, BIC and BAFO were lower in the surviving solid-type 3D-printed implant than in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this preclinical study, 3D-printed implants of double-rooted teeth showed high primary stability. However, 3D-printed implants with interlocking structures such as lattices might provide high secondary stability and successful osseointegration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9436642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94366422022-09-09 Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study Lee, Jungwon Li, Ling Song, Hyun-Young Son, Min-Jung Lee, Yong-Moo Koo, Ki-Tae J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: Various studies have investigated 3-dimensional (3D)-printed implants using Ti-6Al-4V powder; however, multi-root 3D-printed implants have not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to explore the stability of multirooted 3D-printed implants with lattice and solid structures. The secondary outcomes were comparisons between the 2 types of 3D-printed implants in micro-computed tomographic and histological analyses. METHODS: Lattice- and solid-type 3D-printed implants for the left and right mandibular third premolars in beagle dogs were fabricated. Four implants in each group were placed immediately following tooth extraction. Implant stability measurement and periapical X-rays were performed every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Peri-implant bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured by micro-computed tomography. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were measured in histomorphometric analyses. RESULTS: All 4 lattice-type 3D-printed implants survived. Three solid-type 3D-printed implants were removed before the planned sacrifice date due to implant mobility. A slight, gradual increase in implant stability values from implant surgery to 4 weeks after surgery was observed in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. The marginal bone change of the surviving solid-type 3D-printed implant was approximately 5 mm, whereas the value was approximately 2 mm in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. BV/TV and BMD in the lattice type 3D-printed implants were similar to those in the surviving solid-type implant. However, BIC and BAFO were lower in the surviving solid-type 3D-printed implant than in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this preclinical study, 3D-printed implants of double-rooted teeth showed high primary stability. However, 3D-printed implants with interlocking structures such as lattices might provide high secondary stability and successful osseointegration. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9436642/ /pubmed/36047586 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2105720286 Text en Copyright © 2022. Korean Academy of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Jungwon
Li, Ling
Song, Hyun-Young
Son, Min-Jung
Lee, Yong-Moo
Koo, Ki-Tae
Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study
title Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study
title_full Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study
title_fullStr Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study
title_short Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study
title_sort impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3d-printed multiroot dental implants using ti-6al-4v: a preclinical pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047586
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2105720286
work_keys_str_mv AT leejungwon impactoflatticeversussolidstructureof3dprintedmultirootdentalimplantsusingti6al4vapreclinicalpilotstudy
AT liling impactoflatticeversussolidstructureof3dprintedmultirootdentalimplantsusingti6al4vapreclinicalpilotstudy
AT songhyunyoung impactoflatticeversussolidstructureof3dprintedmultirootdentalimplantsusingti6al4vapreclinicalpilotstudy
AT sonminjung impactoflatticeversussolidstructureof3dprintedmultirootdentalimplantsusingti6al4vapreclinicalpilotstudy
AT leeyongmoo impactoflatticeversussolidstructureof3dprintedmultirootdentalimplantsusingti6al4vapreclinicalpilotstudy
AT kookitae impactoflatticeversussolidstructureof3dprintedmultirootdentalimplantsusingti6al4vapreclinicalpilotstudy