Cargando…

Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

PURPOSE: The best pattern of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer has not been determined. Our study evaluated the efficacy and postoperative events of different treatments using the Bayesian network meta‐analysis. METHODS: We systematically tracked randomized clinical t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bao, Yongxing, Ma, Zeliang, Yuan, Meng, Wang, Yang, Men, Yu, Hui, Zhouguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14588
_version_ 1784781429016625152
author Bao, Yongxing
Ma, Zeliang
Yuan, Meng
Wang, Yang
Men, Yu
Hui, Zhouguang
author_facet Bao, Yongxing
Ma, Zeliang
Yuan, Meng
Wang, Yang
Men, Yu
Hui, Zhouguang
author_sort Bao, Yongxing
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The best pattern of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer has not been determined. Our study evaluated the efficacy and postoperative events of different treatments using the Bayesian network meta‐analysis. METHODS: We systematically tracked randomized clinical trials from the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The following treatments were included: neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (NCRT + S), neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NCT + S), neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by surgery (NRT + S), and surgery alone (S). The Revised Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tools were used to assess the quality of included trials. Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival or disease‐free survival (PFS/DFS) were assessed through hazard ratios (HR). Locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, postoperative mortality, and postoperative morbidity were assessed through odds ratios (OR). These outcomes were compared between different treatments through Bayesian network meta‐analysis. RESULTS: Twenty trials with 4384 patients were included. Compared with S, only NCRT + S could significantly improve OS for patients with esophageal cancer (HR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68–0.88). NCRT + S and NCT + S significantly improved PFS/DFS compared with S (NCRT + S vs. S, HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.63–0.81; NCT + S vs. S, HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.97). NCRT + S significantly reduced both locoregional recurrence (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.51–0.88) and distant metastasis (OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.90) compared with S. There were no differences in postoperative morbidity between the four treatments. However, NCRT + S also increased postoperative mortality compared with S (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.09–2.82) and NCT + S (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.11–3.51). CONCLUSION: NCRT + S is the most efficient neoadjuvant treatment for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer. However, NCRT + S increases the risk of postoperative mortality but not morbidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9436699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94366992022-09-09 Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis Bao, Yongxing Ma, Zeliang Yuan, Meng Wang, Yang Men, Yu Hui, Zhouguang Thorac Cancer Original Articles PURPOSE: The best pattern of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer has not been determined. Our study evaluated the efficacy and postoperative events of different treatments using the Bayesian network meta‐analysis. METHODS: We systematically tracked randomized clinical trials from the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The following treatments were included: neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (NCRT + S), neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NCT + S), neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by surgery (NRT + S), and surgery alone (S). The Revised Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tools were used to assess the quality of included trials. Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival or disease‐free survival (PFS/DFS) were assessed through hazard ratios (HR). Locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, postoperative mortality, and postoperative morbidity were assessed through odds ratios (OR). These outcomes were compared between different treatments through Bayesian network meta‐analysis. RESULTS: Twenty trials with 4384 patients were included. Compared with S, only NCRT + S could significantly improve OS for patients with esophageal cancer (HR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68–0.88). NCRT + S and NCT + S significantly improved PFS/DFS compared with S (NCRT + S vs. S, HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.63–0.81; NCT + S vs. S, HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.97). NCRT + S significantly reduced both locoregional recurrence (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.51–0.88) and distant metastasis (OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.90) compared with S. There were no differences in postoperative morbidity between the four treatments. However, NCRT + S also increased postoperative mortality compared with S (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.09–2.82) and NCT + S (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.11–3.51). CONCLUSION: NCRT + S is the most efficient neoadjuvant treatment for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer. However, NCRT + S increases the risk of postoperative mortality but not morbidity. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-07-26 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9436699/ /pubmed/35891585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14588 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bao, Yongxing
Ma, Zeliang
Yuan, Meng
Wang, Yang
Men, Yu
Hui, Zhouguang
Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_full Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_short Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_sort comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14588
work_keys_str_mv AT baoyongxing comparisonofdifferentneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablelocoregionalesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mazeliang comparisonofdifferentneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablelocoregionalesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yuanmeng comparisonofdifferentneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablelocoregionalesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangyang comparisonofdifferentneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablelocoregionalesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT menyu comparisonofdifferentneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablelocoregionalesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT huizhouguang comparisonofdifferentneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablelocoregionalesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis