Cargando…
Is theology more of a field than a father is a king? Modelling semantic relatedness in processing literal and metaphorical statements
One major question in the study of metaphors historically is: Are different mechanisms involved in the comprehension of figurative statements versus literal statements? Many studies have addressed this question from a variety of perspectives, with mixed results. Following Harati, Westbury, and Kiaee...
Autores principales: | Westbury, Chris, Harati, Parastoo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35318579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02072-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Metaphors are Embodied, and so are Their Literal Counterparts
por: Santana, Eduardo, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes
por: Troyer, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Suppression of literal meaning in single and extended metaphors
por: Ronderos, Camilo R., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
An Embodied Tutoring System for Literal vs. Metaphorical Concepts
por: Sionti, Marietta, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Perspectives on the insidious nature of pain metaphor: we literally need to change our metaphors
por: Johnson, Mark I., et al.
Publicado: (2023)