Cargando…
Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
INTRODUCTION: In the management of acute hospital admissions during the COVID‐19 pandemic, safe patient cohorting depends on robust admission diagnostic strategies. It is essential that screening strategies are sensitive and rapid, to prevent nosocomial transmission of COVID‐19 and maintain patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.13530 |
_version_ | 1784781478003998720 |
---|---|
author | Livingstone, Robert Woodhead, Alexander Bhandari, Megha Dias, James Smith, Trevor Havelock, Tom Stammers, Matthew |
author_facet | Livingstone, Robert Woodhead, Alexander Bhandari, Megha Dias, James Smith, Trevor Havelock, Tom Stammers, Matthew |
author_sort | Livingstone, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In the management of acute hospital admissions during the COVID‐19 pandemic, safe patient cohorting depends on robust admission diagnostic strategies. It is essential that screening strategies are sensitive and rapid, to prevent nosocomial transmission of COVID‐19 and maintain patient flow. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all COVID‐19 positive and suspected cases at our institution screened by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) between 4 April and 28 June 2020. Using RT‐PCR positivity within 7 days as our reference standard, we assessed sensitivity and net‐benefit of three admission screening strategies: single admission RT‐PCR, composite admission RT‐PCR and CXR and repeat RT‐PCR with 48 h. RESULTS: RT‐PCR single‐test sensitivity was 91.5% (87.8%–94.4%) versus 97.7% (95.4%–99.1%) (p = 0.025) for RT‐PCR/CXR composite testing and 95.1% (92.1%–97.2%) (p = 0.03) for repeated RT‐PCR. Net‐benefit was 0.83 for single RT‐PCR versus 0.89 for RT‐PCR/CXR and 0.87 for repeated RT‐PCR at 0.02% threshold probability. CONCLUSION: The RT‐PCR/CXR composite testing strategy was highly sensitive when screening patients at the point of hospital admission. Real‐world sensitivity of this approach was comparable to repeat RT‐PCR testing within 48 h; however, faster facilitating improved patient flow. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9436905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94369052022-09-09 Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission Livingstone, Robert Woodhead, Alexander Bhandari, Megha Dias, James Smith, Trevor Havelock, Tom Stammers, Matthew Clin Respir J Brief Report INTRODUCTION: In the management of acute hospital admissions during the COVID‐19 pandemic, safe patient cohorting depends on robust admission diagnostic strategies. It is essential that screening strategies are sensitive and rapid, to prevent nosocomial transmission of COVID‐19 and maintain patient flow. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all COVID‐19 positive and suspected cases at our institution screened by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) between 4 April and 28 June 2020. Using RT‐PCR positivity within 7 days as our reference standard, we assessed sensitivity and net‐benefit of three admission screening strategies: single admission RT‐PCR, composite admission RT‐PCR and CXR and repeat RT‐PCR with 48 h. RESULTS: RT‐PCR single‐test sensitivity was 91.5% (87.8%–94.4%) versus 97.7% (95.4%–99.1%) (p = 0.025) for RT‐PCR/CXR composite testing and 95.1% (92.1%–97.2%) (p = 0.03) for repeated RT‐PCR. Net‐benefit was 0.83 for single RT‐PCR versus 0.89 for RT‐PCR/CXR and 0.87 for repeated RT‐PCR at 0.02% threshold probability. CONCLUSION: The RT‐PCR/CXR composite testing strategy was highly sensitive when screening patients at the point of hospital admission. Real‐world sensitivity of this approach was comparable to repeat RT‐PCR testing within 48 h; however, faster facilitating improved patient flow. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9436905/ /pubmed/35922372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.13530 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Clinical Respiratory Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Livingstone, Robert Woodhead, Alexander Bhandari, Megha Dias, James Smith, Trevor Havelock, Tom Stammers, Matthew Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission |
title | Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission |
title_full | Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission |
title_fullStr | Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission |
title_short | Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission |
title_sort | optimisation of covid‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.13530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT livingstonerobert optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission AT woodheadalexander optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission AT bhandarimegha optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission AT diasjames optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission AT smithtrevor optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission AT havelocktom optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission AT stammersmatthew optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission |