Cargando…

Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission

INTRODUCTION: In the management of acute hospital admissions during the COVID‐19 pandemic, safe patient cohorting depends on robust admission diagnostic strategies. It is essential that screening strategies are sensitive and rapid, to prevent nosocomial transmission of COVID‐19 and maintain patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livingstone, Robert, Woodhead, Alexander, Bhandari, Megha, Dias, James, Smith, Trevor, Havelock, Tom, Stammers, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.13530
_version_ 1784781478003998720
author Livingstone, Robert
Woodhead, Alexander
Bhandari, Megha
Dias, James
Smith, Trevor
Havelock, Tom
Stammers, Matthew
author_facet Livingstone, Robert
Woodhead, Alexander
Bhandari, Megha
Dias, James
Smith, Trevor
Havelock, Tom
Stammers, Matthew
author_sort Livingstone, Robert
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In the management of acute hospital admissions during the COVID‐19 pandemic, safe patient cohorting depends on robust admission diagnostic strategies. It is essential that screening strategies are sensitive and rapid, to prevent nosocomial transmission of COVID‐19 and maintain patient flow. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all COVID‐19 positive and suspected cases at our institution screened by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) between 4 April and 28 June 2020. Using RT‐PCR positivity within 7 days as our reference standard, we assessed sensitivity and net‐benefit of three admission screening strategies: single admission RT‐PCR, composite admission RT‐PCR and CXR and repeat RT‐PCR with 48 h. RESULTS: RT‐PCR single‐test sensitivity was 91.5% (87.8%–94.4%) versus 97.7% (95.4%–99.1%) (p = 0.025) for RT‐PCR/CXR composite testing and 95.1% (92.1%–97.2%) (p = 0.03) for repeated RT‐PCR. Net‐benefit was 0.83 for single RT‐PCR versus 0.89 for RT‐PCR/CXR and 0.87 for repeated RT‐PCR at 0.02% threshold probability. CONCLUSION: The RT‐PCR/CXR composite testing strategy was highly sensitive when screening patients at the point of hospital admission. Real‐world sensitivity of this approach was comparable to repeat RT‐PCR testing within 48 h; however, faster facilitating improved patient flow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9436905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94369052022-09-09 Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission Livingstone, Robert Woodhead, Alexander Bhandari, Megha Dias, James Smith, Trevor Havelock, Tom Stammers, Matthew Clin Respir J Brief Report INTRODUCTION: In the management of acute hospital admissions during the COVID‐19 pandemic, safe patient cohorting depends on robust admission diagnostic strategies. It is essential that screening strategies are sensitive and rapid, to prevent nosocomial transmission of COVID‐19 and maintain patient flow. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all COVID‐19 positive and suspected cases at our institution screened by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) between 4 April and 28 June 2020. Using RT‐PCR positivity within 7 days as our reference standard, we assessed sensitivity and net‐benefit of three admission screening strategies: single admission RT‐PCR, composite admission RT‐PCR and CXR and repeat RT‐PCR with 48 h. RESULTS: RT‐PCR single‐test sensitivity was 91.5% (87.8%–94.4%) versus 97.7% (95.4%–99.1%) (p = 0.025) for RT‐PCR/CXR composite testing and 95.1% (92.1%–97.2%) (p = 0.03) for repeated RT‐PCR. Net‐benefit was 0.83 for single RT‐PCR versus 0.89 for RT‐PCR/CXR and 0.87 for repeated RT‐PCR at 0.02% threshold probability. CONCLUSION: The RT‐PCR/CXR composite testing strategy was highly sensitive when screening patients at the point of hospital admission. Real‐world sensitivity of this approach was comparable to repeat RT‐PCR testing within 48 h; however, faster facilitating improved patient flow. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9436905/ /pubmed/35922372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.13530 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Clinical Respiratory Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Livingstone, Robert
Woodhead, Alexander
Bhandari, Megha
Dias, James
Smith, Trevor
Havelock, Tom
Stammers, Matthew
Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
title Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
title_full Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
title_fullStr Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
title_full_unstemmed Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
title_short Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
title_sort optimisation of covid‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9436905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.13530
work_keys_str_mv AT livingstonerobert optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission
AT woodheadalexander optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission
AT bhandarimegha optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission
AT diasjames optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission
AT smithtrevor optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission
AT havelocktom optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission
AT stammersmatthew optimisationofcovid19diagnosticpathwaysinacutehospitaladmissionstopreventnosocomialtransmission