Cargando…

Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction

INTRODUCTION: To quantitatively assess visual performance and patient satisfaction during photochromic contact lens (CL) wear in an indoor environment. METHODS: This observational study comprised 82 eyes of 41 healthy subjects (mean age ± standard deviation, 21.7 ± 0.7 years) who had no ophthalmic d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamiya, Kazutaka, Suzuki, Shuya, Fujimura, Fusako
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00552-5
_version_ 1784781524660387840
author Kamiya, Kazutaka
Suzuki, Shuya
Fujimura, Fusako
author_facet Kamiya, Kazutaka
Suzuki, Shuya
Fujimura, Fusako
author_sort Kamiya, Kazutaka
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To quantitatively assess visual performance and patient satisfaction during photochromic contact lens (CL) wear in an indoor environment. METHODS: This observational study comprised 82 eyes of 41 healthy subjects (mean age ± standard deviation, 21.7 ± 0.7 years) who had no ophthalmic diseases except for refractive errors at Kitasato University in 2021. We prospectively compared visual acuity, kinetic visual acuity, functional (time-dependent) visual acuity, the maintaining rate of visual acuity, the response time, contrast sensitivity function, higher-order aberrations, and patient satisfaction score for overall vision in such subjects during photochromic and non-photochromic CL wear in such an environment. RESULTS: The kinetic visual acuity at 30 km/h was 0.32 ± 0.21 and 0.41 ± 0.24 in the photochromic and non-photochromic CL groups, respectively (p = 0.008). The kinetic visual acuity at 60 km/h was 0.32 ± 0.21 and 0.41 ± 0.24, respectively (p = 0.034). The functional visual acuity was 0.00 ± 0.21 and 0.05 ± 0.25, respectively (p = 0.030). The average response time was 1.19 ± 0.15 s and 1.23 ± 0.15 s, respectively (p = 0.029). The patient satisfaction score for overall visual performance was 4.22 ± 0.11 and 3.59 ± 0.68, respectively (p < 0.001). Otherwise, we found no significant differences in visual acuity, the maintaining rate, higher-order aberrations, or contrast sensitivity function (p = 0.116, p = 0.053, p = 0.371, or p = 0.943). We found no apparent complications such as ocular discomfort, superficial punctate keratitis, conjunctival injection, or infectious keratitis during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, the photochromic CL showed good visual quality, especially in terms of kinetic and functional visual acuities and subsequent high patient satisfaction, even in an indoor environment, suggesting its viability of visual correction not only in daily activities but also in indoor sports activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9437160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94371602022-09-03 Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction Kamiya, Kazutaka Suzuki, Shuya Fujimura, Fusako Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To quantitatively assess visual performance and patient satisfaction during photochromic contact lens (CL) wear in an indoor environment. METHODS: This observational study comprised 82 eyes of 41 healthy subjects (mean age ± standard deviation, 21.7 ± 0.7 years) who had no ophthalmic diseases except for refractive errors at Kitasato University in 2021. We prospectively compared visual acuity, kinetic visual acuity, functional (time-dependent) visual acuity, the maintaining rate of visual acuity, the response time, contrast sensitivity function, higher-order aberrations, and patient satisfaction score for overall vision in such subjects during photochromic and non-photochromic CL wear in such an environment. RESULTS: The kinetic visual acuity at 30 km/h was 0.32 ± 0.21 and 0.41 ± 0.24 in the photochromic and non-photochromic CL groups, respectively (p = 0.008). The kinetic visual acuity at 60 km/h was 0.32 ± 0.21 and 0.41 ± 0.24, respectively (p = 0.034). The functional visual acuity was 0.00 ± 0.21 and 0.05 ± 0.25, respectively (p = 0.030). The average response time was 1.19 ± 0.15 s and 1.23 ± 0.15 s, respectively (p = 0.029). The patient satisfaction score for overall visual performance was 4.22 ± 0.11 and 3.59 ± 0.68, respectively (p < 0.001). Otherwise, we found no significant differences in visual acuity, the maintaining rate, higher-order aberrations, or contrast sensitivity function (p = 0.116, p = 0.053, p = 0.371, or p = 0.943). We found no apparent complications such as ocular discomfort, superficial punctate keratitis, conjunctival injection, or infectious keratitis during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, the photochromic CL showed good visual quality, especially in terms of kinetic and functional visual acuities and subsequent high patient satisfaction, even in an indoor environment, suggesting its viability of visual correction not only in daily activities but also in indoor sports activities. Springer Healthcare 2022-07-30 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9437160/ /pubmed/35908148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00552-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Suzuki, Shuya
Fujimura, Fusako
Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction
title Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction
title_full Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction
title_fullStr Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction
title_short Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction
title_sort effect of photochromic contact lens wear on indoor visual performance and patient satisfaction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00552-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kamiyakazutaka effectofphotochromiccontactlenswearonindoorvisualperformanceandpatientsatisfaction
AT suzukishuya effectofphotochromiccontactlenswearonindoorvisualperformanceandpatientsatisfaction
AT fujimurafusako effectofphotochromiccontactlenswearonindoorvisualperformanceandpatientsatisfaction