Cargando…
Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies using remote ischemia postconditioning (RIPostC) for ischemic stroke in experimental models and obtain factors that significantly influence treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peer‐reviewed studies were identified and selected based on the eligibil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13925 |
_version_ | 1784781541616910336 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Kezhou Cai, Zhengting Zhang, Quanwei He, Jiatong Cheng, Yinuo Wei, Shaonong Yin, Mengjie |
author_facet | Liu, Kezhou Cai, Zhengting Zhang, Quanwei He, Jiatong Cheng, Yinuo Wei, Shaonong Yin, Mengjie |
author_sort | Liu, Kezhou |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies using remote ischemia postconditioning (RIPostC) for ischemic stroke in experimental models and obtain factors that significantly influence treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peer‐reviewed studies were identified and selected based on the eligibility criteria, followed by extraction of data on potentially influential factors related to model preparation, postconditioning, and measure time based on outcome measures including infarct size, neurological scales, and cell tests with autophagy, apoptosis, normal‐neuron, and damaged‐neuron counting. Then, all data were preprocessed, grouped, and meta‐analyzed with the indicator of the standardized mean difference. RESULTS: Fifty‐seven studies with 224 experiments (91 for infarct size, 92 for neurological scales, and 41 for cell‐level tests) were included. There was little statistical difference between different model preparations, treated body parts, number of treatments, and sides. And treatment effect was generally a positive correlation with the duration of conditioning time to stroke onset with exceptions at some time points. Based on infarct size, the number of cycles per treatment, duration of occlusion, and release per cycle showed significant differences. Combined with the effect sizes by other measures, the occlusion/release duration of 8–10 min per cycle is better than 5 min, and three cycles per treatment were most frequently used with good effects. Effect also varied when measuring at different times, showing statistical differences in infarct size and most neurological scales. RIPostC is confirmed as an effective therapeutic intervention for ischemic stroke, while the RIPostC‐mediated autophagy level being activated or inhibited remained conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: Conditioning time, number of cycles per treatment, duration of occlusion, and release per cycle were found to influence the treatment effects of RIPostC significantly. More studies on the relevant influential factors and autophagy mechanisms are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9437239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94372392022-09-09 Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study Liu, Kezhou Cai, Zhengting Zhang, Quanwei He, Jiatong Cheng, Yinuo Wei, Shaonong Yin, Mengjie CNS Neurosci Ther Meta‐analysis OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies using remote ischemia postconditioning (RIPostC) for ischemic stroke in experimental models and obtain factors that significantly influence treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peer‐reviewed studies were identified and selected based on the eligibility criteria, followed by extraction of data on potentially influential factors related to model preparation, postconditioning, and measure time based on outcome measures including infarct size, neurological scales, and cell tests with autophagy, apoptosis, normal‐neuron, and damaged‐neuron counting. Then, all data were preprocessed, grouped, and meta‐analyzed with the indicator of the standardized mean difference. RESULTS: Fifty‐seven studies with 224 experiments (91 for infarct size, 92 for neurological scales, and 41 for cell‐level tests) were included. There was little statistical difference between different model preparations, treated body parts, number of treatments, and sides. And treatment effect was generally a positive correlation with the duration of conditioning time to stroke onset with exceptions at some time points. Based on infarct size, the number of cycles per treatment, duration of occlusion, and release per cycle showed significant differences. Combined with the effect sizes by other measures, the occlusion/release duration of 8–10 min per cycle is better than 5 min, and three cycles per treatment were most frequently used with good effects. Effect also varied when measuring at different times, showing statistical differences in infarct size and most neurological scales. RIPostC is confirmed as an effective therapeutic intervention for ischemic stroke, while the RIPostC‐mediated autophagy level being activated or inhibited remained conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: Conditioning time, number of cycles per treatment, duration of occlusion, and release per cycle were found to influence the treatment effects of RIPostC significantly. More studies on the relevant influential factors and autophagy mechanisms are warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9437239/ /pubmed/35896511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13925 Text en © 2022 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Meta‐analysis Liu, Kezhou Cai, Zhengting Zhang, Quanwei He, Jiatong Cheng, Yinuo Wei, Shaonong Yin, Mengjie Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study |
title | Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study |
title_full | Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study |
title_fullStr | Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study |
title_short | Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study |
title_sort | determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: a systematic review and meta‐analysis study |
topic | Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13925 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liukezhou determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT caizhengting determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT zhangquanwei determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT hejiatong determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT chengyinuo determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT weishaonong determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT yinmengjie determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy |