Cargando…

Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies using remote ischemia postconditioning (RIPostC) for ischemic stroke in experimental models and obtain factors that significantly influence treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peer‐reviewed studies were identified and selected based on the eligibil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Kezhou, Cai, Zhengting, Zhang, Quanwei, He, Jiatong, Cheng, Yinuo, Wei, Shaonong, Yin, Mengjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13925
_version_ 1784781541616910336
author Liu, Kezhou
Cai, Zhengting
Zhang, Quanwei
He, Jiatong
Cheng, Yinuo
Wei, Shaonong
Yin, Mengjie
author_facet Liu, Kezhou
Cai, Zhengting
Zhang, Quanwei
He, Jiatong
Cheng, Yinuo
Wei, Shaonong
Yin, Mengjie
author_sort Liu, Kezhou
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies using remote ischemia postconditioning (RIPostC) for ischemic stroke in experimental models and obtain factors that significantly influence treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peer‐reviewed studies were identified and selected based on the eligibility criteria, followed by extraction of data on potentially influential factors related to model preparation, postconditioning, and measure time based on outcome measures including infarct size, neurological scales, and cell tests with autophagy, apoptosis, normal‐neuron, and damaged‐neuron counting. Then, all data were preprocessed, grouped, and meta‐analyzed with the indicator of the standardized mean difference. RESULTS: Fifty‐seven studies with 224 experiments (91 for infarct size, 92 for neurological scales, and 41 for cell‐level tests) were included. There was little statistical difference between different model preparations, treated body parts, number of treatments, and sides. And treatment effect was generally a positive correlation with the duration of conditioning time to stroke onset with exceptions at some time points. Based on infarct size, the number of cycles per treatment, duration of occlusion, and release per cycle showed significant differences. Combined with the effect sizes by other measures, the occlusion/release duration of 8–10 min per cycle is better than 5 min, and three cycles per treatment were most frequently used with good effects. Effect also varied when measuring at different times, showing statistical differences in infarct size and most neurological scales. RIPostC is confirmed as an effective therapeutic intervention for ischemic stroke, while the RIPostC‐mediated autophagy level being activated or inhibited remained conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: Conditioning time, number of cycles per treatment, duration of occlusion, and release per cycle were found to influence the treatment effects of RIPostC significantly. More studies on the relevant influential factors and autophagy mechanisms are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9437239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94372392022-09-09 Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study Liu, Kezhou Cai, Zhengting Zhang, Quanwei He, Jiatong Cheng, Yinuo Wei, Shaonong Yin, Mengjie CNS Neurosci Ther Meta‐analysis OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies using remote ischemia postconditioning (RIPostC) for ischemic stroke in experimental models and obtain factors that significantly influence treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peer‐reviewed studies were identified and selected based on the eligibility criteria, followed by extraction of data on potentially influential factors related to model preparation, postconditioning, and measure time based on outcome measures including infarct size, neurological scales, and cell tests with autophagy, apoptosis, normal‐neuron, and damaged‐neuron counting. Then, all data were preprocessed, grouped, and meta‐analyzed with the indicator of the standardized mean difference. RESULTS: Fifty‐seven studies with 224 experiments (91 for infarct size, 92 for neurological scales, and 41 for cell‐level tests) were included. There was little statistical difference between different model preparations, treated body parts, number of treatments, and sides. And treatment effect was generally a positive correlation with the duration of conditioning time to stroke onset with exceptions at some time points. Based on infarct size, the number of cycles per treatment, duration of occlusion, and release per cycle showed significant differences. Combined with the effect sizes by other measures, the occlusion/release duration of 8–10 min per cycle is better than 5 min, and three cycles per treatment were most frequently used with good effects. Effect also varied when measuring at different times, showing statistical differences in infarct size and most neurological scales. RIPostC is confirmed as an effective therapeutic intervention for ischemic stroke, while the RIPostC‐mediated autophagy level being activated or inhibited remained conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: Conditioning time, number of cycles per treatment, duration of occlusion, and release per cycle were found to influence the treatment effects of RIPostC significantly. More studies on the relevant influential factors and autophagy mechanisms are warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9437239/ /pubmed/35896511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13925 Text en © 2022 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Meta‐analysis
Liu, Kezhou
Cai, Zhengting
Zhang, Quanwei
He, Jiatong
Cheng, Yinuo
Wei, Shaonong
Yin, Mengjie
Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study
title Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study
title_full Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study
title_fullStr Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study
title_full_unstemmed Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study
title_short Determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: A systematic review and meta‐analysis study
title_sort determination of significant parameters in remote ischemic postconditioning for ischemic stroke in experimental models: a systematic review and meta‐analysis study
topic Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13925
work_keys_str_mv AT liukezhou determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT caizhengting determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT zhangquanwei determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT hejiatong determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT chengyinuo determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT weishaonong determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy
AT yinmengjie determinationofsignificantparametersinremoteischemicpostconditioningforischemicstrokeinexperimentalmodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy