Cargando…

Innate immunity to malaria: The good, the bad and the unknown

Malaria is the cause of 600.000 deaths annually. However, these deaths represent only a tiny fraction of total malaria cases. Repeated natural infections with the causative agent, Plasmodium sp. parasites, induce protection from severe disease but not sterile immunity. Thus, immunity to Plasmodium i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pohl, Kai, Cockburn, Ian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.914598
_version_ 1784781608436367360
author Pohl, Kai
Cockburn, Ian A.
author_facet Pohl, Kai
Cockburn, Ian A.
author_sort Pohl, Kai
collection PubMed
description Malaria is the cause of 600.000 deaths annually. However, these deaths represent only a tiny fraction of total malaria cases. Repeated natural infections with the causative agent, Plasmodium sp. parasites, induce protection from severe disease but not sterile immunity. Thus, immunity to Plasmodium is incomplete. Conversely, immunization with attenuated sporozoite stage parasites can induce sterile immunity albeit after multiple vaccinations. These different outcomes are likely to be influenced strongly by the innate immune response to different stages of the parasite lifecycle. Even small numbers of sporozoites can induce a robust proinflammatory type I interferon response, which is believed to be driven by the sensing of parasite RNA. Moreover, induction of innate like gamma-delta cells contributes to the development of adaptive immune responses. Conversely, while blood stage parasites can induce a strong proinflammatory response, regulatory mechanisms are also triggered. In agreement with this, intact parasites are relatively weakly sensed by innate immune cells, but isolated parasite molecules, notably DNA and RNA can induce strong responses. Thus, the innate response to Plasmodium parasite likely represents a trade-off between strong pro-inflammatory responses that may potentiate immunity and regulatory processes that protect the host from cytokine storms that can induce life threatening illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9437427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94374272022-09-03 Innate immunity to malaria: The good, the bad and the unknown Pohl, Kai Cockburn, Ian A. Front Immunol Immunology Malaria is the cause of 600.000 deaths annually. However, these deaths represent only a tiny fraction of total malaria cases. Repeated natural infections with the causative agent, Plasmodium sp. parasites, induce protection from severe disease but not sterile immunity. Thus, immunity to Plasmodium is incomplete. Conversely, immunization with attenuated sporozoite stage parasites can induce sterile immunity albeit after multiple vaccinations. These different outcomes are likely to be influenced strongly by the innate immune response to different stages of the parasite lifecycle. Even small numbers of sporozoites can induce a robust proinflammatory type I interferon response, which is believed to be driven by the sensing of parasite RNA. Moreover, induction of innate like gamma-delta cells contributes to the development of adaptive immune responses. Conversely, while blood stage parasites can induce a strong proinflammatory response, regulatory mechanisms are also triggered. In agreement with this, intact parasites are relatively weakly sensed by innate immune cells, but isolated parasite molecules, notably DNA and RNA can induce strong responses. Thus, the innate response to Plasmodium parasite likely represents a trade-off between strong pro-inflammatory responses that may potentiate immunity and regulatory processes that protect the host from cytokine storms that can induce life threatening illness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9437427/ /pubmed/36059493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.914598 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pohl and Cockburn https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Pohl, Kai
Cockburn, Ian A.
Innate immunity to malaria: The good, the bad and the unknown
title Innate immunity to malaria: The good, the bad and the unknown
title_full Innate immunity to malaria: The good, the bad and the unknown
title_fullStr Innate immunity to malaria: The good, the bad and the unknown
title_full_unstemmed Innate immunity to malaria: The good, the bad and the unknown
title_short Innate immunity to malaria: The good, the bad and the unknown
title_sort innate immunity to malaria: the good, the bad and the unknown
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.914598
work_keys_str_mv AT pohlkai innateimmunitytomalariathegoodthebadandtheunknown
AT cockburniana innateimmunitytomalariathegoodthebadandtheunknown