Cargando…

Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Futile recanalization occurs when the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a technical success but fails to achieve a favorable outcome. This study aimed to use machine learning (ML) algorithms to develop a pre-EVT model and a post-EVT model to predict the risk of futile recana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Xinping, Zheng, Xiaohan, Zhang, Juan, Cui, Xiaoli, Zou, Daizu, Zhao, Zheng, Pan, Xiding, Jie, Qiong, Wu, Yuezhang, Qiu, Runze, Zhou, Junshan, Chen, Nihong, Tang, Li, Ge, Chun, Zou, Jianjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36062013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.909403
_version_ 1784781662910939136
author Lin, Xinping
Zheng, Xiaohan
Zhang, Juan
Cui, Xiaoli
Zou, Daizu
Zhao, Zheng
Pan, Xiding
Jie, Qiong
Wu, Yuezhang
Qiu, Runze
Zhou, Junshan
Chen, Nihong
Tang, Li
Ge, Chun
Zou, Jianjun
author_facet Lin, Xinping
Zheng, Xiaohan
Zhang, Juan
Cui, Xiaoli
Zou, Daizu
Zhao, Zheng
Pan, Xiding
Jie, Qiong
Wu, Yuezhang
Qiu, Runze
Zhou, Junshan
Chen, Nihong
Tang, Li
Ge, Chun
Zou, Jianjun
author_sort Lin, Xinping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Futile recanalization occurs when the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a technical success but fails to achieve a favorable outcome. This study aimed to use machine learning (ML) algorithms to develop a pre-EVT model and a post-EVT model to predict the risk of futile recanalization and to provide meaningful insights to assess the prognostic factors associated with futile recanalization. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing EVT at the National Advanced Stroke Center of Nanjing First Hospital (China) between April 2017 and May 2021 were analyzed. The baseline characteristics and peri-interventional characteristics were assessed using four ML algorithms. The predictive performance was evaluated by the area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic and calibration curve. In addition, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach and partial dependence plot were introduced to understand the relative importance and the influence of a single feature. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients were included in this study. Of the four ML models that include baseline characteristics, the “Early” XGBoost had a better performance {AUC, 0.790 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.677–0.903]; Brier, 0.191}. Subsequent inclusion of peri-interventional characteristics into the “Early” XGBoost showed that the “Late” XGBoost performed better [AUC, 0.910 (95% CI, 0.837–0.984); Brier, 0.123]. NIHSS after 24 h, age, groin to recanalization, and the number of passages were the critical prognostic factors associated with futile recanalization, and the SHAP approach shows that NIHSS after 24 h ranks first in relative importance. CONCLUSIONS: The “Early” XGBoost and the “Late” XGBoost allowed us to predict futile recanalization before and after EVT accurately. Our study suggests that including peri-interventional characteristics may lead to superior predictive performance compared to a model based on baseline characteristics only. In addition, NIHSS after 24 h was the most important prognostic factor for futile recanalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9437637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94376372022-09-03 Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy Lin, Xinping Zheng, Xiaohan Zhang, Juan Cui, Xiaoli Zou, Daizu Zhao, Zheng Pan, Xiding Jie, Qiong Wu, Yuezhang Qiu, Runze Zhou, Junshan Chen, Nihong Tang, Li Ge, Chun Zou, Jianjun Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Futile recanalization occurs when the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a technical success but fails to achieve a favorable outcome. This study aimed to use machine learning (ML) algorithms to develop a pre-EVT model and a post-EVT model to predict the risk of futile recanalization and to provide meaningful insights to assess the prognostic factors associated with futile recanalization. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing EVT at the National Advanced Stroke Center of Nanjing First Hospital (China) between April 2017 and May 2021 were analyzed. The baseline characteristics and peri-interventional characteristics were assessed using four ML algorithms. The predictive performance was evaluated by the area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic and calibration curve. In addition, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach and partial dependence plot were introduced to understand the relative importance and the influence of a single feature. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients were included in this study. Of the four ML models that include baseline characteristics, the “Early” XGBoost had a better performance {AUC, 0.790 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.677–0.903]; Brier, 0.191}. Subsequent inclusion of peri-interventional characteristics into the “Early” XGBoost showed that the “Late” XGBoost performed better [AUC, 0.910 (95% CI, 0.837–0.984); Brier, 0.123]. NIHSS after 24 h, age, groin to recanalization, and the number of passages were the critical prognostic factors associated with futile recanalization, and the SHAP approach shows that NIHSS after 24 h ranks first in relative importance. CONCLUSIONS: The “Early” XGBoost and the “Late” XGBoost allowed us to predict futile recanalization before and after EVT accurately. Our study suggests that including peri-interventional characteristics may lead to superior predictive performance compared to a model based on baseline characteristics only. In addition, NIHSS after 24 h was the most important prognostic factor for futile recanalization. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9437637/ /pubmed/36062013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.909403 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lin, Zheng, Zhang, Cui, Zou, Zhao, Pan, Jie, Wu, Qiu, Zhou, Chen, Tang, Ge and Zou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Lin, Xinping
Zheng, Xiaohan
Zhang, Juan
Cui, Xiaoli
Zou, Daizu
Zhao, Zheng
Pan, Xiding
Jie, Qiong
Wu, Yuezhang
Qiu, Runze
Zhou, Junshan
Chen, Nihong
Tang, Li
Ge, Chun
Zou, Jianjun
Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy
title Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy
title_full Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy
title_fullStr Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy
title_short Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy
title_sort machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36062013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.909403
work_keys_str_mv AT linxinping machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT zhengxiaohan machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT zhangjuan machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT cuixiaoli machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT zoudaizu machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT zhaozheng machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT panxiding machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT jieqiong machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT wuyuezhang machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT qiurunze machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT zhoujunshan machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT chennihong machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT tangli machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT gechun machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy
AT zoujianjun machinelearningtopredictfutilerecanalizationoflargevesselocclusionbeforeandafterendovascularthrombectomy