Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in Japan

OBJECTIVES: Follow-up invasive coronary angiography (FUICA) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to increase the rate of early coronary revascularisation without reducing the incidence of subsequent myocardial infarction or death. However, no studies have evaluated the cost-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shiina, Tetsuya, Goto-Hirano, Keiko, Takura, Tomoyuki, Daida, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061617
_version_ 1784781684096368640
author Shiina, Tetsuya
Goto-Hirano, Keiko
Takura, Tomoyuki
Daida, Hiroyuki
author_facet Shiina, Tetsuya
Goto-Hirano, Keiko
Takura, Tomoyuki
Daida, Hiroyuki
author_sort Shiina, Tetsuya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Follow-up invasive coronary angiography (FUICA) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to increase the rate of early coronary revascularisation without reducing the incidence of subsequent myocardial infarction or death. However, no studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of FUICA in patients after coronary stenting. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FUICA after PCI. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: 497 hospitals. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Overall, 558 patients who underwent coronary artery stenting between April 2014 and March 2015 were matched and included in the invasive angiographic follow-up (AF) group (n=279), in which patients underwent FUICA 6–12 months after PCI, or in the clinical follow-up alone group (CF; n=279) using propensity scores. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, urgent coronary revascularisation, stroke or hospitalisation for the heart failure. The secondary endpoints included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, hospitalisation for the heart failure and any coronary revascularisation after a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Costs were calculated as direct medical expenses based on medical fee billing information. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary endpoint was 5.3% in the AF group and 4.7% in the CF group (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.47 to 2.20; p=0.98). The total incremental cost at the 3-year endpoint in the AF group was US$1874 higher than that in the CF group (US$8947±US$5684 vs US$7073±US$6360; p≤0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FUICA increased the costs but did not improve clinical benefits. Thus, FUICA is not economically more attractive than CF alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000039768.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9437734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94377342022-09-02 Cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in Japan Shiina, Tetsuya Goto-Hirano, Keiko Takura, Tomoyuki Daida, Hiroyuki BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: Follow-up invasive coronary angiography (FUICA) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to increase the rate of early coronary revascularisation without reducing the incidence of subsequent myocardial infarction or death. However, no studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of FUICA in patients after coronary stenting. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FUICA after PCI. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: 497 hospitals. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Overall, 558 patients who underwent coronary artery stenting between April 2014 and March 2015 were matched and included in the invasive angiographic follow-up (AF) group (n=279), in which patients underwent FUICA 6–12 months after PCI, or in the clinical follow-up alone group (CF; n=279) using propensity scores. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, urgent coronary revascularisation, stroke or hospitalisation for the heart failure. The secondary endpoints included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, hospitalisation for the heart failure and any coronary revascularisation after a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Costs were calculated as direct medical expenses based on medical fee billing information. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary endpoint was 5.3% in the AF group and 4.7% in the CF group (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.47 to 2.20; p=0.98). The total incremental cost at the 3-year endpoint in the AF group was US$1874 higher than that in the CF group (US$8947±US$5684 vs US$7073±US$6360; p≤0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FUICA increased the costs but did not improve clinical benefits. Thus, FUICA is not economically more attractive than CF alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000039768. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9437734/ /pubmed/36041769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061617 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Shiina, Tetsuya
Goto-Hirano, Keiko
Takura, Tomoyuki
Daida, Hiroyuki
Cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in Japan
title Cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in Japan
title_full Cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in Japan
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in Japan
title_short Cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in Japan
title_sort cost-effectiveness of follow-up invasive coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary stenting: a real-world observational cohort study in japan
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061617
work_keys_str_mv AT shiinatetsuya costeffectivenessoffollowupinvasivecoronaryangiographyafterpercutaneouscoronarystentingarealworldobservationalcohortstudyinjapan
AT gotohiranokeiko costeffectivenessoffollowupinvasivecoronaryangiographyafterpercutaneouscoronarystentingarealworldobservationalcohortstudyinjapan
AT takuratomoyuki costeffectivenessoffollowupinvasivecoronaryangiographyafterpercutaneouscoronarystentingarealworldobservationalcohortstudyinjapan
AT daidahiroyuki costeffectivenessoffollowupinvasivecoronaryangiographyafterpercutaneouscoronarystentingarealworldobservationalcohortstudyinjapan