Cargando…

Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence of cancer, coupled with improved survivorship, has increased demand for cancer follow-up care and the need to find alternative models of care. Shared cancer follow-up care in general practice is a safe option in terms of quality of life and cancer recurrence; how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandell, Tiffany, Schütze, Heike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055460
_version_ 1784781732933795840
author Sandell, Tiffany
Schütze, Heike
author_facet Sandell, Tiffany
Schütze, Heike
author_sort Sandell, Tiffany
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence of cancer, coupled with improved survivorship, has increased demand for cancer follow-up care and the need to find alternative models of care. Shared cancer follow-up care in general practice is a safe option in terms of quality of life and cancer recurrence; however, there are barriers to translating this into practice. This review aimed to identify factors that influence the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice. METHODS: Systematic review. Seven electronic databases: MEDLINE, Science Citation Index, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, APA Psychinfo, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition and Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, were searched for published papers between January 1999 and December 2021. The narrative review included papers if they were available in full-text, English, peer-reviewed and focused on shared cancer follow-up care. RESULTS: Thirty-eight papers were included in the final review. Five main themes emerged: (1) reciprocal clinical information sharing is needed between oncologists and general practitioners, and needs to be timely and relevant; (2) responsibility of care should be shared with the oncologist overseeing care; (3) general practitioners skills and knowledge to provide cancer follow-up care; (4) need for clinical management guidelines and rapid referral to support general practitioners to provide shared follow-up care and (5) continuity of care and satisfaction of care is vital for shared care. CONCLUSION: The acceptability of shared cancer follow-up care is increasing. Several barriers still exist to translating this into practice. Work is required to develop a shared-care model that can support general practitioners, while the oncologist can oversee the care and implement two-way communication between general and oncologists’ clinics. The move towards integrating electronic healthcare records and web-based platforms for information exchange provides a promise to the timely exchange of information. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020191538.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9438010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94380102022-09-14 Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review Sandell, Tiffany Schütze, Heike BMJ Open Oncology BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence of cancer, coupled with improved survivorship, has increased demand for cancer follow-up care and the need to find alternative models of care. Shared cancer follow-up care in general practice is a safe option in terms of quality of life and cancer recurrence; however, there are barriers to translating this into practice. This review aimed to identify factors that influence the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice. METHODS: Systematic review. Seven electronic databases: MEDLINE, Science Citation Index, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, APA Psychinfo, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition and Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, were searched for published papers between January 1999 and December 2021. The narrative review included papers if they were available in full-text, English, peer-reviewed and focused on shared cancer follow-up care. RESULTS: Thirty-eight papers were included in the final review. Five main themes emerged: (1) reciprocal clinical information sharing is needed between oncologists and general practitioners, and needs to be timely and relevant; (2) responsibility of care should be shared with the oncologist overseeing care; (3) general practitioners skills and knowledge to provide cancer follow-up care; (4) need for clinical management guidelines and rapid referral to support general practitioners to provide shared follow-up care and (5) continuity of care and satisfaction of care is vital for shared care. CONCLUSION: The acceptability of shared cancer follow-up care is increasing. Several barriers still exist to translating this into practice. Work is required to develop a shared-care model that can support general practitioners, while the oncologist can oversee the care and implement two-way communication between general and oncologists’ clinics. The move towards integrating electronic healthcare records and web-based platforms for information exchange provides a promise to the timely exchange of information. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020191538. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9438010/ /pubmed/36038175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055460 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Sandell, Tiffany
Schütze, Heike
Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review
title Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review
title_full Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review
title_fullStr Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review
title_short Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review
title_sort factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055460
work_keys_str_mv AT sandelltiffany factorsinfluencingthetranslationofsharedcancerfollowupcareintoclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT schutzeheike factorsinfluencingthetranslationofsharedcancerfollowupcareintoclinicalpracticeasystematicreview