Cargando…

Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive model of secondary preventive care. There is a wide variety in implementation characteristics globally, and hence quality control is paramount. Thus, the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation was urged to devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abukhadijah, Hana J, Turk-Adawi, Karam I, Dewart, Nora, Grace, Sherry L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064255
_version_ 1784781734878904320
author Abukhadijah, Hana J
Turk-Adawi, Karam I
Dewart, Nora
Grace, Sherry L
author_facet Abukhadijah, Hana J
Turk-Adawi, Karam I
Dewart, Nora
Grace, Sherry L
author_sort Abukhadijah, Hana J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive model of secondary preventive care. There is a wide variety in implementation characteristics globally, and hence quality control is paramount. Thus, the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation was urged to develop a CR registry. The purpose of this study was to test the perceived usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry (ICRR) to optimise it. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study, comprising virtual usability tests using a think-aloud method to elicit feedback on the ICRR, while end-users were entering patient data, followed by semistructured interviews. SETTING: Ultimately, 12 tests were conducted with CR staff (67% female) in low-resource settings from a variety of disciplines in all regions of the world but Europe before saturation was achieved. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Participants completed the System Usability Scale. Interviews were transcribed verbatim except to preserve anonymity, and coded using NVIVO by two researchers independently. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 informed analysis. RESULTS: The ICRR was established as easy to use, relevant, efficient, with easy learnability, operability, perceived usefulness, positive perceptions of output quality and high end-user satisfaction. System usability was 83.75, or ‘excellent’ and rated ‘A’. Four major themes were deduced from the interviews: (1) ease of approvals, adoption and implementation; (2) benefits for programmes, (3) variables and their definitions, as well as (4) patient report and follow-up assessment. Based on participant observation and utterances, suggestions for changes to the ICRR were implemented, including to the programme survey, on-boarding processes, navigational instructions, inclusion of programme logos, direction on handling unavailable data and optimising data completeness, as well as policies for authorship and programme certification. CONCLUSIONS: With usability of the ICRR optimised, pilot testing shall ensue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9438019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94380192022-09-14 Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry Abukhadijah, Hana J Turk-Adawi, Karam I Dewart, Nora Grace, Sherry L BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive model of secondary preventive care. There is a wide variety in implementation characteristics globally, and hence quality control is paramount. Thus, the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation was urged to develop a CR registry. The purpose of this study was to test the perceived usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry (ICRR) to optimise it. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study, comprising virtual usability tests using a think-aloud method to elicit feedback on the ICRR, while end-users were entering patient data, followed by semistructured interviews. SETTING: Ultimately, 12 tests were conducted with CR staff (67% female) in low-resource settings from a variety of disciplines in all regions of the world but Europe before saturation was achieved. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Participants completed the System Usability Scale. Interviews were transcribed verbatim except to preserve anonymity, and coded using NVIVO by two researchers independently. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 informed analysis. RESULTS: The ICRR was established as easy to use, relevant, efficient, with easy learnability, operability, perceived usefulness, positive perceptions of output quality and high end-user satisfaction. System usability was 83.75, or ‘excellent’ and rated ‘A’. Four major themes were deduced from the interviews: (1) ease of approvals, adoption and implementation; (2) benefits for programmes, (3) variables and their definitions, as well as (4) patient report and follow-up assessment. Based on participant observation and utterances, suggestions for changes to the ICRR were implemented, including to the programme survey, on-boarding processes, navigational instructions, inclusion of programme logos, direction on handling unavailable data and optimising data completeness, as well as policies for authorship and programme certification. CONCLUSIONS: With usability of the ICRR optimised, pilot testing shall ensue. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9438019/ /pubmed/36038174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064255 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Abukhadijah, Hana J
Turk-Adawi, Karam I
Dewart, Nora
Grace, Sherry L
Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry
title Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry
title_full Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry
title_fullStr Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry
title_short Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry
title_sort qualitative study measuring the usability of the international cardiac rehabilitation registry
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064255
work_keys_str_mv AT abukhadijahhanaj qualitativestudymeasuringtheusabilityoftheinternationalcardiacrehabilitationregistry
AT turkadawikarami qualitativestudymeasuringtheusabilityoftheinternationalcardiacrehabilitationregistry
AT dewartnora qualitativestudymeasuringtheusabilityoftheinternationalcardiacrehabilitationregistry
AT gracesherryl qualitativestudymeasuringtheusabilityoftheinternationalcardiacrehabilitationregistry