Cargando…
Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study
INTRODUCTION: A range of referral criteria and scores have been developed in recent years to help with screening for the need of specialist palliative care (SPC) in advanced, incurable cancer patients. However, referral criteria have not yet been widely implemented in oncology, as they usually need...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059598 |
_version_ | 1784781778275270656 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Evelyn Müller, Michael Josef Boehlke, Christopher Ramsenthaler, Christina Jäger, Helga Schäfer, Henning Ostgathe, Christoph Klein, Carsten Simon, Steffen Becker, Gerhild |
author_facet | Müller, Evelyn Müller, Michael Josef Boehlke, Christopher Ramsenthaler, Christina Jäger, Helga Schäfer, Henning Ostgathe, Christoph Klein, Carsten Simon, Steffen Becker, Gerhild |
author_sort | Müller, Evelyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A range of referral criteria and scores have been developed in recent years to help with screening for the need of specialist palliative care (SPC) in advanced, incurable cancer patients. However, referral criteria have not yet been widely implemented in oncology, as they usually need to be revised by physicians or nurses with limited time resources. To develop an easily applicable screening for the need for SPC in incurable cancer inpatients, we aim to (a) test inter-rater reliability of multiprofessional expert opinion as reference standard for SPC need (phase I) and (b) explore the diagnostic validity of selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and routine data for the need of SPC (phase II). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion criteria for patients are metastatic or locally advanced, incurable cancer, ≥18 years of age and informed consent by patient or proxy. (Exclusion criteria: malignant haematological disease as main diagnosis). In phase I, three palliative care consultation teams (PCTs) of three German university hospitals assess the SPC need of 20 patient cases. Fleiss’ Kappa will be calculated for inter-rater reliability. In phase II, 208 patients are consecutively recruited in four inpatient oncology wards of Freiburg University Hospital. The PCT will provide assessment of SPC need. As potential referral criteria, patients complete PROMs and a selection of routine data on person, disease and treatment is documented. Logistic regression models and ROC analyses are employed to test their utility in screening for SPC need. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings and congresses. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Albert-Ludwigs—University Freiburg, Germany (approval no. 20-1103). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00021686, registered on 17 December 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9438211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94382112022-09-14 Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study Müller, Evelyn Müller, Michael Josef Boehlke, Christopher Ramsenthaler, Christina Jäger, Helga Schäfer, Henning Ostgathe, Christoph Klein, Carsten Simon, Steffen Becker, Gerhild BMJ Open Palliative Care INTRODUCTION: A range of referral criteria and scores have been developed in recent years to help with screening for the need of specialist palliative care (SPC) in advanced, incurable cancer patients. However, referral criteria have not yet been widely implemented in oncology, as they usually need to be revised by physicians or nurses with limited time resources. To develop an easily applicable screening for the need for SPC in incurable cancer inpatients, we aim to (a) test inter-rater reliability of multiprofessional expert opinion as reference standard for SPC need (phase I) and (b) explore the diagnostic validity of selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and routine data for the need of SPC (phase II). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion criteria for patients are metastatic or locally advanced, incurable cancer, ≥18 years of age and informed consent by patient or proxy. (Exclusion criteria: malignant haematological disease as main diagnosis). In phase I, three palliative care consultation teams (PCTs) of three German university hospitals assess the SPC need of 20 patient cases. Fleiss’ Kappa will be calculated for inter-rater reliability. In phase II, 208 patients are consecutively recruited in four inpatient oncology wards of Freiburg University Hospital. The PCT will provide assessment of SPC need. As potential referral criteria, patients complete PROMs and a selection of routine data on person, disease and treatment is documented. Logistic regression models and ROC analyses are employed to test their utility in screening for SPC need. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings and congresses. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Albert-Ludwigs—University Freiburg, Germany (approval no. 20-1103). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00021686, registered on 17 December 2020. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9438211/ /pubmed/36581985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059598 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Palliative Care Müller, Evelyn Müller, Michael Josef Boehlke, Christopher Ramsenthaler, Christina Jäger, Helga Schäfer, Henning Ostgathe, Christoph Klein, Carsten Simon, Steffen Becker, Gerhild Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study |
title | Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study |
title_full | Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study |
title_fullStr | Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study |
title_short | Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study |
title_sort | development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the screeningpall study |
topic | Palliative Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059598 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullerevelyn developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT mullermichaeljosef developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT boehlkechristopher developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT ramsenthalerchristina developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT jagerhelga developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT schaferhenning developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT ostgathechristoph developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT kleincarsten developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT simonsteffen developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy AT beckergerhild developmentofascreeningtoolfortheneedofspecialistpalliativecareinoncologicinpatientsstudyprotocolforthescreeningpallstudy |