Cargando…
Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language
The rise of precision medicine has led to an unprecedented focus on human biological material in biomedical research. In addition, rapid advances in stem cell technology, regenerative medicine and synthetic biology are leading to more complex human tissue structures and new applications with tremend...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36050689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00823-7 |
_version_ | 1784781791135006720 |
---|---|
author | Lensink, Michael A. Jongsma, Karin R. Boers, Sarah N. Bredenoord, Annelien L. |
author_facet | Lensink, Michael A. Jongsma, Karin R. Boers, Sarah N. Bredenoord, Annelien L. |
author_sort | Lensink, Michael A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rise of precision medicine has led to an unprecedented focus on human biological material in biomedical research. In addition, rapid advances in stem cell technology, regenerative medicine and synthetic biology are leading to more complex human tissue structures and new applications with tremendous potential for medicine. While promising, these developments also raise several ethical and practical challenges which have been the subject of extensive academic debate. These debates have led to increasing calls for longitudinal governance arrangements between tissue providers and biobanks that go beyond the initial moment of obtaining consent, such as closer involvement of tissue providers in what happens to their tissue, and more active participatory approaches to the governance of biobanks. However, in spite of these calls, such measures are being adopted slowly in practice, and there remains a strong tendency to focus on the consent procedure as the tool for addressing the ethical challenges of contemporary biobanking. In this paper, we argue that one of the barriers to this transition is the dominant language pervading the field of human tissue research, in which the provision of tissue is phrased as a ‘donation’ or ‘gift’, and tissue providers are referred to as ‘donors’. Because of the performative qualities of language, the effect of using ‘donation’ and ‘donor’ shapes a professional culture in which biobank participants are perceived as passive providers of tissue free from further considerations or entitlements. This hampers the kind of participatory approaches to governance that are deemed necessary to adequately address the ethical challenges currently faced in human tissue research. Rather than reinforcing this idea through language, we need to pave the way for the kind of participatory approaches to governance that are being extensively argued for by starting with the appropriate terminology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9438266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94382662022-09-03 Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language Lensink, Michael A. Jongsma, Karin R. Boers, Sarah N. Bredenoord, Annelien L. BMC Med Ethics Debate The rise of precision medicine has led to an unprecedented focus on human biological material in biomedical research. In addition, rapid advances in stem cell technology, regenerative medicine and synthetic biology are leading to more complex human tissue structures and new applications with tremendous potential for medicine. While promising, these developments also raise several ethical and practical challenges which have been the subject of extensive academic debate. These debates have led to increasing calls for longitudinal governance arrangements between tissue providers and biobanks that go beyond the initial moment of obtaining consent, such as closer involvement of tissue providers in what happens to their tissue, and more active participatory approaches to the governance of biobanks. However, in spite of these calls, such measures are being adopted slowly in practice, and there remains a strong tendency to focus on the consent procedure as the tool for addressing the ethical challenges of contemporary biobanking. In this paper, we argue that one of the barriers to this transition is the dominant language pervading the field of human tissue research, in which the provision of tissue is phrased as a ‘donation’ or ‘gift’, and tissue providers are referred to as ‘donors’. Because of the performative qualities of language, the effect of using ‘donation’ and ‘donor’ shapes a professional culture in which biobank participants are perceived as passive providers of tissue free from further considerations or entitlements. This hampers the kind of participatory approaches to governance that are deemed necessary to adequately address the ethical challenges currently faced in human tissue research. Rather than reinforcing this idea through language, we need to pave the way for the kind of participatory approaches to governance that are being extensively argued for by starting with the appropriate terminology. BioMed Central 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9438266/ /pubmed/36050689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00823-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Lensink, Michael A. Jongsma, Karin R. Boers, Sarah N. Bredenoord, Annelien L. Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language |
title | Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language |
title_full | Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language |
title_fullStr | Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language |
title_full_unstemmed | Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language |
title_short | Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language |
title_sort | better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36050689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00823-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lensinkmichaela bettergovernancestartswithbetterwordswhyresponsiblehumantissueresearchdemandsachangeoflanguage AT jongsmakarinr bettergovernancestartswithbetterwordswhyresponsiblehumantissueresearchdemandsachangeoflanguage AT boerssarahn bettergovernancestartswithbetterwordswhyresponsiblehumantissueresearchdemandsachangeoflanguage AT bredenoordannelienl bettergovernancestartswithbetterwordswhyresponsiblehumantissueresearchdemandsachangeoflanguage |