Cargando…
The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women
BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel method for improving movement quality called open-ended augmented feedback has been introduced. However, the effects of using such feedback in a training intervention have not yet been examined. The aim of this study was to assess the changes in performance and movement...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36056403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00556-5 |
_version_ | 1784781795133227008 |
---|---|
author | Stien, N. Andersen, V. Engelsrud, G. H. Solstad, T. E. J. Saeterbakken, A. H. |
author_facet | Stien, N. Andersen, V. Engelsrud, G. H. Solstad, T. E. J. Saeterbakken, A. H. |
author_sort | Stien, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel method for improving movement quality called open-ended augmented feedback has been introduced. However, the effects of using such feedback in a training intervention have not yet been examined. The aim of this study was to assess the changes in performance and movement quality following a five-week resistance-training program with either (1) technological feedback or (2) traditional, verbal feedback from an experienced trainer. METHODS: Nineteen untrained females (age: 21.84 ± 2.24 years, height: 169.95 ± 5.92 cm, body mass: 65.05 ± 7.93 kg) randomly allocated to one of the two conditions completed five weeks of training with two weekly sessions. Pre- and post-intervention, participants were tested for physical performance (i.e., back squat and isometric mid-thigh pull strength) and movement quality parameters (weight distribution, center of gravity variation, and subjective rating of the back squat technique). RESULTS: Both groups similarly increased the training resistance throughout the intervention (p < 0.01), as well as strength in the back squat (technological feedback group: effect size (ES) = 1.31, p = 0.002; traditional feedback group: ES = 1.48, p = 0.002). Only the traditional feedback group increased isometric mid-thigh pull strength (ES = 1.11, p = 0.008) and subjectively rated lifting technique at the same load (p = 0.046). No changes in force distribution (p = 0.062–0.993) or center of gravity variation (p = 0.160–0.969) occurred in either group when lifting the same absolute loads at post-test. However, both groups displayed a greater variation in center of gravity when lifting the same relative load at post-test (technological feedback group: p < 0.001; traditional feedback group: p = 0.006). No differences were found between the groups for any of the observed changes (p = 0.205–0.401). CONCLUSIONS: Five weeks of back-squat training with verbal feedback increased isometric mid-thigh pull strength and subjectively rated lifting technique from pre- to post-test, whereas technological feedback did not. Both methods improved back squat strength and training resistance. For resistance-training beginners, the choice between feedback methods should be based on the desired outcomes and the availability of expertise and equipment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9438286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94382862022-09-03 The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women Stien, N. Andersen, V. Engelsrud, G. H. Solstad, T. E. J. Saeterbakken, A. H. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel method for improving movement quality called open-ended augmented feedback has been introduced. However, the effects of using such feedback in a training intervention have not yet been examined. The aim of this study was to assess the changes in performance and movement quality following a five-week resistance-training program with either (1) technological feedback or (2) traditional, verbal feedback from an experienced trainer. METHODS: Nineteen untrained females (age: 21.84 ± 2.24 years, height: 169.95 ± 5.92 cm, body mass: 65.05 ± 7.93 kg) randomly allocated to one of the two conditions completed five weeks of training with two weekly sessions. Pre- and post-intervention, participants were tested for physical performance (i.e., back squat and isometric mid-thigh pull strength) and movement quality parameters (weight distribution, center of gravity variation, and subjective rating of the back squat technique). RESULTS: Both groups similarly increased the training resistance throughout the intervention (p < 0.01), as well as strength in the back squat (technological feedback group: effect size (ES) = 1.31, p = 0.002; traditional feedback group: ES = 1.48, p = 0.002). Only the traditional feedback group increased isometric mid-thigh pull strength (ES = 1.11, p = 0.008) and subjectively rated lifting technique at the same load (p = 0.046). No changes in force distribution (p = 0.062–0.993) or center of gravity variation (p = 0.160–0.969) occurred in either group when lifting the same absolute loads at post-test. However, both groups displayed a greater variation in center of gravity when lifting the same relative load at post-test (technological feedback group: p < 0.001; traditional feedback group: p = 0.006). No differences were found between the groups for any of the observed changes (p = 0.205–0.401). CONCLUSIONS: Five weeks of back-squat training with verbal feedback increased isometric mid-thigh pull strength and subjectively rated lifting technique from pre- to post-test, whereas technological feedback did not. Both methods improved back squat strength and training resistance. For resistance-training beginners, the choice between feedback methods should be based on the desired outcomes and the availability of expertise and equipment. BioMed Central 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9438286/ /pubmed/36056403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00556-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stien, N. Andersen, V. Engelsrud, G. H. Solstad, T. E. J. Saeterbakken, A. H. The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women |
title | The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women |
title_full | The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women |
title_fullStr | The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women |
title_short | The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women |
title_sort | effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36056403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00556-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stienn theeffectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT andersenv theeffectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT engelsrudgh theeffectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT solstadtej theeffectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT saeterbakkenah theeffectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT stienn effectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT andersenv effectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT engelsrudgh effectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT solstadtej effectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen AT saeterbakkenah effectsoftechnologicalandtraditionalfeedbackonbacksquatperformanceinuntrainedwomen |