Cargando…

A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and fiberoptic ductoscopy (FDS) for pathologic nipple discharge (PND). METHODS: HFUS and FDS were conducted in 210 patients with PND (248 lesions) treated at our hospital. The diagnostic accuracy of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Hongmei, Tang, Xuemei, Mou, Xurong, Fan, Yuhong, Yan, Xiang, Li, Jinsui, Hou, Lingmi, Ren, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36056332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00885-4
_version_ 1784781795686875136
author Yuan, Hongmei
Tang, Xuemei
Mou, Xurong
Fan, Yuhong
Yan, Xiang
Li, Jinsui
Hou, Lingmi
Ren, Min
author_facet Yuan, Hongmei
Tang, Xuemei
Mou, Xurong
Fan, Yuhong
Yan, Xiang
Li, Jinsui
Hou, Lingmi
Ren, Min
author_sort Yuan, Hongmei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and fiberoptic ductoscopy (FDS) for pathologic nipple discharge (PND). METHODS: HFUS and FDS were conducted in 210 patients with PND (248 lesions) treated at our hospital. The diagnostic accuracy of these two methods was compared using pathological diagnosis as the standard. RESULTS: Among 248 lesions, 16 and 15 of 16 malignant lesions were accurately diagnosed by HFUS and FDS, respectively. Of 232 benign lesions, 183 and 196 cases were accurately diagnosed by HFUS and FDS, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of HFUS in diagnosis of intraductal lesions were 84.36% (95% CI 79.26–88.39%), 60% (95% CI 23.07–92.89%), 96.03% (95% CI 96.55–99.83%), and 7.31% (95% CI 2.52–19.4%) respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of FDS in diagnosis of intraductal lesions were 86.83% (95% CI 82.00–90.52%), 100% (95% CI 56.55–100%), 100% (95% CI 98.21–100%), and 13.51% (95% CI 5.91–27.98%) respectively. Diagnostic accuracy rates of HFUS and FDS were 83.87% (208/248) and 85.08% (211/248), respectively, exhibiting no statistically differences (χ(2) = 0.80, P > 0.05). The accuracy of HFUS combined with FDS was 93.14% (231/248), showing statistically differences (χ(2) = 10.91, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both HFUS and FDS demonstrated high diagnostic values for PND. HFUS has the advantage of non-invasive for nipple discharge with duct ectasia, exhibited good qualitative and localization diagnostic values. It is the preferred evaluation method for patients with nipple discharge. When HFUS cannot identify the cause of PND, FDS can be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9438288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94382882022-09-03 A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge Yuan, Hongmei Tang, Xuemei Mou, Xurong Fan, Yuhong Yan, Xiang Li, Jinsui Hou, Lingmi Ren, Min BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and fiberoptic ductoscopy (FDS) for pathologic nipple discharge (PND). METHODS: HFUS and FDS were conducted in 210 patients with PND (248 lesions) treated at our hospital. The diagnostic accuracy of these two methods was compared using pathological diagnosis as the standard. RESULTS: Among 248 lesions, 16 and 15 of 16 malignant lesions were accurately diagnosed by HFUS and FDS, respectively. Of 232 benign lesions, 183 and 196 cases were accurately diagnosed by HFUS and FDS, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of HFUS in diagnosis of intraductal lesions were 84.36% (95% CI 79.26–88.39%), 60% (95% CI 23.07–92.89%), 96.03% (95% CI 96.55–99.83%), and 7.31% (95% CI 2.52–19.4%) respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of FDS in diagnosis of intraductal lesions were 86.83% (95% CI 82.00–90.52%), 100% (95% CI 56.55–100%), 100% (95% CI 98.21–100%), and 13.51% (95% CI 5.91–27.98%) respectively. Diagnostic accuracy rates of HFUS and FDS were 83.87% (208/248) and 85.08% (211/248), respectively, exhibiting no statistically differences (χ(2) = 0.80, P > 0.05). The accuracy of HFUS combined with FDS was 93.14% (231/248), showing statistically differences (χ(2) = 10.91, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both HFUS and FDS demonstrated high diagnostic values for PND. HFUS has the advantage of non-invasive for nipple discharge with duct ectasia, exhibited good qualitative and localization diagnostic values. It is the preferred evaluation method for patients with nipple discharge. When HFUS cannot identify the cause of PND, FDS can be considered. BioMed Central 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9438288/ /pubmed/36056332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00885-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yuan, Hongmei
Tang, Xuemei
Mou, Xurong
Fan, Yuhong
Yan, Xiang
Li, Jinsui
Hou, Lingmi
Ren, Min
A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge
title A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge
title_full A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge
title_short A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge
title_sort comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36056332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00885-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanhongmei acomparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT tangxuemei acomparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT mouxurong acomparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT fanyuhong acomparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT yanxiang acomparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT lijinsui acomparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT houlingmi acomparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT renmin acomparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT yuanhongmei comparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT tangxuemei comparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT mouxurong comparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT fanyuhong comparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT yanxiang comparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT lijinsui comparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT houlingmi comparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge
AT renmin comparativeanalysisofdiagnosticvaluesofhighfrequencyultrasoundandfiberopticductoscopyforpathologicnippledischarge