Cargando…

Female participation or “feminization” of medicine

More and more women chose medicine as their profession. Female students and graduates outnumber their male colleagues in Austria and the EU. However, the career paths of men and women differ after a certain point, and more and more female talent is lost along the career stages. Women hold only 30% o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steiner-Hofbauer, Verena, Katz, Henri W., Grundnig, Julia S., Holzinger, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-022-00961-y
_version_ 1784781812189364224
author Steiner-Hofbauer, Verena
Katz, Henri W.
Grundnig, Julia S.
Holzinger, Anita
author_facet Steiner-Hofbauer, Verena
Katz, Henri W.
Grundnig, Julia S.
Holzinger, Anita
author_sort Steiner-Hofbauer, Verena
collection PubMed
description More and more women chose medicine as their profession. Female students and graduates outnumber their male colleagues in Austria and the EU. However, the career paths of men and women differ after a certain point, and more and more female talent is lost along the career stages. Women hold only 30% of professor positions at state medical universities in Austria and only 11.9% of all chief physicians are female. Motherhood and related absence is the main career obstacle, but gender bias and missing role models are also factors hindering women to thrive. Improved working conditions would be beneficial for all members of the medical profession. Future generations (Generation Y, Generation Z) will likely expedite changes toward a better work-life balance and claim the right to find fulfillment besides work. Compatibility of family and work and the chance to individualize career paths could be important factors for employers to find and bind their employees. Additionally, (gender) diverse teams improve the group process and collective intelligence. Therefore, patient care and innovation can only benefit from a diverse medical workforce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9438362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94383622022-09-02 Female participation or “feminization” of medicine Steiner-Hofbauer, Verena Katz, Henri W. Grundnig, Julia S. Holzinger, Anita Wien Med Wochenschr Main Topic More and more women chose medicine as their profession. Female students and graduates outnumber their male colleagues in Austria and the EU. However, the career paths of men and women differ after a certain point, and more and more female talent is lost along the career stages. Women hold only 30% of professor positions at state medical universities in Austria and only 11.9% of all chief physicians are female. Motherhood and related absence is the main career obstacle, but gender bias and missing role models are also factors hindering women to thrive. Improved working conditions would be beneficial for all members of the medical profession. Future generations (Generation Y, Generation Z) will likely expedite changes toward a better work-life balance and claim the right to find fulfillment besides work. Compatibility of family and work and the chance to individualize career paths could be important factors for employers to find and bind their employees. Additionally, (gender) diverse teams improve the group process and collective intelligence. Therefore, patient care and innovation can only benefit from a diverse medical workforce. Springer Vienna 2022-09-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9438362/ /pubmed/36053405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-022-00961-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Main Topic
Steiner-Hofbauer, Verena
Katz, Henri W.
Grundnig, Julia S.
Holzinger, Anita
Female participation or “feminization” of medicine
title Female participation or “feminization” of medicine
title_full Female participation or “feminization” of medicine
title_fullStr Female participation or “feminization” of medicine
title_full_unstemmed Female participation or “feminization” of medicine
title_short Female participation or “feminization” of medicine
title_sort female participation or “feminization” of medicine
topic Main Topic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-022-00961-y
work_keys_str_mv AT steinerhofbauerverena femaleparticipationorfeminizationofmedicine
AT katzhenriw femaleparticipationorfeminizationofmedicine
AT grundnigjulias femaleparticipationorfeminizationofmedicine
AT holzingeranita femaleparticipationorfeminizationofmedicine