Cargando…

Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The collaborative care (CC) is emerging as an effective method in treating patients with multimorbidity, but evidence whether this model is effective for people with comorbid depression and diabetes is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether CC could improve depression o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yanshang, Hu, Mingzheng, Zhu, Dawei, Ding, Ruoxi, He, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117873
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6443
_version_ 1784781830460801024
author Wang, Yanshang
Hu, Mingzheng
Zhu, Dawei
Ding, Ruoxi
He, Ping
author_facet Wang, Yanshang
Hu, Mingzheng
Zhu, Dawei
Ding, Ruoxi
He, Ping
author_sort Wang, Yanshang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: The collaborative care (CC) is emerging as an effective method in treating patients with multimorbidity, but evidence whether this model is effective for people with comorbid depression and diabetes is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether CC could improve depression outcomes and HbA1c in patients with depressive symptoms and diabetes, and assess its effects on Quality of Life (QoL). METHOD: The author searched Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, PsycINFO and CINAHL to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs published up to October 21, 2020. Studies were required to assess CC in patients with depressive symptoms and diabetes. The primary outcomes were depression treatment response rate and HbA1c and secondary outcome was Quality of Life (QoL). Available individual patient data was collected from all eligible studies. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers and critically appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, and the fixed effects and random effects model were used to pool Relative Risks (RRs) and Standard Mean Differences (SMDs). RESULTS: Our research identified 7906 articles, and finally 12 RCTs were included. Study sample sizes ranged from 58 to 417. The total follow-up period ranged from 12 weeks to 24 months. At follow-up, depression treatment response rate had a significant increase (RR = 1·31, 95% CI 1·23 to 1·39, I(2) = 0%) in CC patients compared to controls. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c between CC group and the control group (SMD = 0·15, 95% CI -0·35 to 0·65, I(2) = 97·6%). Overall QoL at follow-up was greater (SMD = 0·12, 95% CI 0·03 to 0·21, I(2) = 54·2%) in CC patients compared to controls but the difference was minor. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis supported the effectiveness of CC in reducing depression and improving QoL in people with comorbid depression and diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9438466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94384662022-09-16 Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Yanshang Hu, Mingzheng Zhu, Dawei Ding, Ruoxi He, Ping Int J Integr Care Research and Theory BACKGROUND AND AIM: The collaborative care (CC) is emerging as an effective method in treating patients with multimorbidity, but evidence whether this model is effective for people with comorbid depression and diabetes is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether CC could improve depression outcomes and HbA1c in patients with depressive symptoms and diabetes, and assess its effects on Quality of Life (QoL). METHOD: The author searched Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, PsycINFO and CINAHL to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs published up to October 21, 2020. Studies were required to assess CC in patients with depressive symptoms and diabetes. The primary outcomes were depression treatment response rate and HbA1c and secondary outcome was Quality of Life (QoL). Available individual patient data was collected from all eligible studies. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers and critically appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, and the fixed effects and random effects model were used to pool Relative Risks (RRs) and Standard Mean Differences (SMDs). RESULTS: Our research identified 7906 articles, and finally 12 RCTs were included. Study sample sizes ranged from 58 to 417. The total follow-up period ranged from 12 weeks to 24 months. At follow-up, depression treatment response rate had a significant increase (RR = 1·31, 95% CI 1·23 to 1·39, I(2) = 0%) in CC patients compared to controls. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c between CC group and the control group (SMD = 0·15, 95% CI -0·35 to 0·65, I(2) = 97·6%). Overall QoL at follow-up was greater (SMD = 0·12, 95% CI 0·03 to 0·21, I(2) = 54·2%) in CC patients compared to controls but the difference was minor. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis supported the effectiveness of CC in reducing depression and improving QoL in people with comorbid depression and diabetes. Ubiquity Press 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9438466/ /pubmed/36117873 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6443 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Wang, Yanshang
Hu, Mingzheng
Zhu, Dawei
Ding, Ruoxi
He, Ping
Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effectiveness of collaborative care for depression and hba1c in patients with depression and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117873
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6443
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyanshang effectivenessofcollaborativecarefordepressionandhba1cinpatientswithdepressionanddiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT humingzheng effectivenessofcollaborativecarefordepressionandhba1cinpatientswithdepressionanddiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhudawei effectivenessofcollaborativecarefordepressionandhba1cinpatientswithdepressionanddiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dingruoxi effectivenessofcollaborativecarefordepressionandhba1cinpatientswithdepressionanddiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heping effectivenessofcollaborativecarefordepressionandhba1cinpatientswithdepressionanddiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis