Cargando…
Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe
BACKGROUND: DIALOG+ is an evidence-based, generic, cost-saving and easily deliverable psychosocial intervention, adaptable to clinicians’ personal manner of interaction with patients. It was implemented in mental health services in five low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe during...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.539 |
_version_ | 1784781833677832192 |
---|---|
author | Ribic, Emina Sikira, Hana Dzubur Kulenovic, Alma Pemovska, Tamara Russo, Manuela Jovanovic, Nikolina Radojicic, Tamara Repisti, Selman Milutinović, Miloš Blazevska, Biljana Konjufca, Jon Ramadani, Fjolla Jerotic, Stefan Savic, Bojana |
author_facet | Ribic, Emina Sikira, Hana Dzubur Kulenovic, Alma Pemovska, Tamara Russo, Manuela Jovanovic, Nikolina Radojicic, Tamara Repisti, Selman Milutinović, Miloš Blazevska, Biljana Konjufca, Jon Ramadani, Fjolla Jerotic, Stefan Savic, Bojana |
author_sort | Ribic, Emina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: DIALOG+ is an evidence-based, generic, cost-saving and easily deliverable psychosocial intervention, adaptable to clinicians’ personal manner of interaction with patients. It was implemented in mental health services in five low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe during a 12-month randomised-controlled trial (IMPULSE) to improve the effectiveness of out-patient treatment for people with psychotic disorders. AIMS: To investigate barriers and facilitators to the perceived sustainability of DIALOG+ that has been successfully implemented as a part of the IMPULSE project. METHOD: Three months after the IMPULSE trial's end, perceived sustainability of the DIALOG+ intervention was assessed via a short survey of clinicians and patients who took part in the trial. Quantitative data collected from the survey were analysed using descriptive statistics; content analysis assessed qualitative survey data. The views and experiences of key informants (patients, clinicians and healthcare policy influencers) regarding the sustainability and scale-up of DIALOG+ were further explored through semi-structured interviews. These data were explored using framework analysis. RESULTS: Clinicians mostly appreciated the comprehensiveness of DIALOG+, and patients described DIALOG+ meetings as empowering and motivating. The barrier most commonly identified by key informants was availability of financial resources; the most important facilitators were the clinically relevant structure and comprehensiveness of the DIALOG+ intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Participants showed a willingness to sustain the implementation of DIALOG+. It is important to maintain collaboration with healthcare policy influencers to improve implementation of DIALOG+ across different levels of healthcare systems and ensure availability of resources for implementing psychosocial interventions such as DIALOG+. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9438482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94384822022-09-14 Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe Ribic, Emina Sikira, Hana Dzubur Kulenovic, Alma Pemovska, Tamara Russo, Manuela Jovanovic, Nikolina Radojicic, Tamara Repisti, Selman Milutinović, Miloš Blazevska, Biljana Konjufca, Jon Ramadani, Fjolla Jerotic, Stefan Savic, Bojana BJPsych Open Papers BACKGROUND: DIALOG+ is an evidence-based, generic, cost-saving and easily deliverable psychosocial intervention, adaptable to clinicians’ personal manner of interaction with patients. It was implemented in mental health services in five low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe during a 12-month randomised-controlled trial (IMPULSE) to improve the effectiveness of out-patient treatment for people with psychotic disorders. AIMS: To investigate barriers and facilitators to the perceived sustainability of DIALOG+ that has been successfully implemented as a part of the IMPULSE project. METHOD: Three months after the IMPULSE trial's end, perceived sustainability of the DIALOG+ intervention was assessed via a short survey of clinicians and patients who took part in the trial. Quantitative data collected from the survey were analysed using descriptive statistics; content analysis assessed qualitative survey data. The views and experiences of key informants (patients, clinicians and healthcare policy influencers) regarding the sustainability and scale-up of DIALOG+ were further explored through semi-structured interviews. These data were explored using framework analysis. RESULTS: Clinicians mostly appreciated the comprehensiveness of DIALOG+, and patients described DIALOG+ meetings as empowering and motivating. The barrier most commonly identified by key informants was availability of financial resources; the most important facilitators were the clinically relevant structure and comprehensiveness of the DIALOG+ intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Participants showed a willingness to sustain the implementation of DIALOG+. It is important to maintain collaboration with healthcare policy influencers to improve implementation of DIALOG+ across different levels of healthcare systems and ensure availability of resources for implementing psychosocial interventions such as DIALOG+. Cambridge University Press 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9438482/ /pubmed/35968901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.539 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Papers Ribic, Emina Sikira, Hana Dzubur Kulenovic, Alma Pemovska, Tamara Russo, Manuela Jovanovic, Nikolina Radojicic, Tamara Repisti, Selman Milutinović, Miloš Blazevska, Biljana Konjufca, Jon Ramadani, Fjolla Jerotic, Stefan Savic, Bojana Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe |
title | Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe |
title_full | Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe |
title_fullStr | Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe |
title_short | Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe |
title_sort | perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in south-eastern europe |
topic | Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ribicemina perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT sikirahana perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT dzuburkulenovicalma perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT pemovskatamara perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT russomanuela perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT jovanovicnikolina perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT radojicictamara perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT repistiselman perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT milutinovicmilos perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT blazevskabiljana perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT konjufcajon perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT ramadanifjolla perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT jeroticstefan perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope AT savicbojana perceivedsustainabilityofpsychosocialtreatmentinlowandmiddleincomecountriesinsoutheasterneurope |