Cargando…

Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students

BACKGROUND: The objective structured practical examination (OSPE) is used as an assessment tool of laboratory practical sessions. This study described the design and implementation of peer-led mock OSPE for first- and second-year medical students, investigated the perception of the students of the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsaif, Faisal, Alkuwaiz, Lamia, Alhumud, Mohammed, Bin Idris, Reem, Neel, Lina, Aljabry, Mansour, Soliman, Mona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059924
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S359669
_version_ 1784781901491339264
author Alsaif, Faisal
Alkuwaiz, Lamia
Alhumud, Mohammed
Bin Idris, Reem
Neel, Lina
Aljabry, Mansour
Soliman, Mona
author_facet Alsaif, Faisal
Alkuwaiz, Lamia
Alhumud, Mohammed
Bin Idris, Reem
Neel, Lina
Aljabry, Mansour
Soliman, Mona
author_sort Alsaif, Faisal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective structured practical examination (OSPE) is used as an assessment tool of laboratory practical sessions. This study described the design and implementation of peer-led mock OSPE for first- and second-year medical students, investigated the perception of the students of the peer-led mock OSPE and the impact of attending the mock OSPE on the performance. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Two mock OSPEs were designed and conducted by third-, fourth- and fifth- year medical students for year one and two. Each mock OSPE involved six stations. Thirty-three medical students facilitated the OSPE. The OSPEs were conducted prior to the summative end of block exams. Following the mock OSPEs, an online survey was sent to the participants to assess their satisfaction, quality and benefits of the mock OSPE. The study also evaluated the impact of the mock OSPE on students’ performance. RESULTS: Out of 313 first-year students, 279 (89.1%) attended the mock OSPE and out of 298 second-year students, 213 (71.5%) attended. A total of 192 (68.8%) first-year medical students and 102 (47.9%) second-year medical students completed the questionnaire. There was no significant difference between attending and non-attending the mock OSPE in the students’ performance in the summative OSPE. The majority of students felt more confident, less anxious, and lowered the levels of stress after attending the mock OSPE. More than half of the students felt that attending the mock OSPE helped in easing the steps, better preparation, provided sufficient orientation, well explained the materials and helped them to learn the concept of the final OSPE. The majority of students found the mock OSPE stimulating. CONCLUSION: Attending the mock OSPE did not affect the students’ performance in the summative OSPE. However, the peer-assessed mock OSPE improved the medical students’ confidence and lowered the anxiety associated with OSPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9438775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94387752022-09-03 Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students Alsaif, Faisal Alkuwaiz, Lamia Alhumud, Mohammed Bin Idris, Reem Neel, Lina Aljabry, Mansour Soliman, Mona Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: The objective structured practical examination (OSPE) is used as an assessment tool of laboratory practical sessions. This study described the design and implementation of peer-led mock OSPE for first- and second-year medical students, investigated the perception of the students of the peer-led mock OSPE and the impact of attending the mock OSPE on the performance. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Two mock OSPEs were designed and conducted by third-, fourth- and fifth- year medical students for year one and two. Each mock OSPE involved six stations. Thirty-three medical students facilitated the OSPE. The OSPEs were conducted prior to the summative end of block exams. Following the mock OSPEs, an online survey was sent to the participants to assess their satisfaction, quality and benefits of the mock OSPE. The study also evaluated the impact of the mock OSPE on students’ performance. RESULTS: Out of 313 first-year students, 279 (89.1%) attended the mock OSPE and out of 298 second-year students, 213 (71.5%) attended. A total of 192 (68.8%) first-year medical students and 102 (47.9%) second-year medical students completed the questionnaire. There was no significant difference between attending and non-attending the mock OSPE in the students’ performance in the summative OSPE. The majority of students felt more confident, less anxious, and lowered the levels of stress after attending the mock OSPE. More than half of the students felt that attending the mock OSPE helped in easing the steps, better preparation, provided sufficient orientation, well explained the materials and helped them to learn the concept of the final OSPE. The majority of students found the mock OSPE stimulating. CONCLUSION: Attending the mock OSPE did not affect the students’ performance in the summative OSPE. However, the peer-assessed mock OSPE improved the medical students’ confidence and lowered the anxiety associated with OSPE. Dove 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9438775/ /pubmed/36059924 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S359669 Text en © 2022 Alsaif et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Alsaif, Faisal
Alkuwaiz, Lamia
Alhumud, Mohammed
Bin Idris, Reem
Neel, Lina
Aljabry, Mansour
Soliman, Mona
Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students
title Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students
title_full Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students
title_short Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students
title_sort evaluation of the experience of peer-led mock objective structured practical examination for first- and second-year medical students
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059924
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S359669
work_keys_str_mv AT alsaiffaisal evaluationoftheexperienceofpeerledmockobjectivestructuredpracticalexaminationforfirstandsecondyearmedicalstudents
AT alkuwaizlamia evaluationoftheexperienceofpeerledmockobjectivestructuredpracticalexaminationforfirstandsecondyearmedicalstudents
AT alhumudmohammed evaluationoftheexperienceofpeerledmockobjectivestructuredpracticalexaminationforfirstandsecondyearmedicalstudents
AT binidrisreem evaluationoftheexperienceofpeerledmockobjectivestructuredpracticalexaminationforfirstandsecondyearmedicalstudents
AT neellina evaluationoftheexperienceofpeerledmockobjectivestructuredpracticalexaminationforfirstandsecondyearmedicalstudents
AT aljabrymansour evaluationoftheexperienceofpeerledmockobjectivestructuredpracticalexaminationforfirstandsecondyearmedicalstudents
AT solimanmona evaluationoftheexperienceofpeerledmockobjectivestructuredpracticalexaminationforfirstandsecondyearmedicalstudents