Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) in SARS-CoV-2 is promising but intriguing due to heterogeneity of published studies. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of convalescent plasma use in COVID-19 to identify its safety and efficacy. MAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choudhuri, Anirban Hom, Duggal, Sakshi, Singh, Jotika, Biswas, Partha Sarathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060163
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_309_21
_version_ 1784781908930985984
author Choudhuri, Anirban Hom
Duggal, Sakshi
Singh, Jotika
Biswas, Partha Sarathi
author_facet Choudhuri, Anirban Hom
Duggal, Sakshi
Singh, Jotika
Biswas, Partha Sarathi
author_sort Choudhuri, Anirban Hom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) in SARS-CoV-2 is promising but intriguing due to heterogeneity of published studies. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of convalescent plasma use in COVID-19 to identify its safety and efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We comprehensively searched the databases - PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for journal papers published between December 2019 and January 2021 about the use of CPT in SARS-CoV-2, and performed a meta-analysis using random effects models and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Of 1529 records, 11 studies were eligible (five RCTs, two nonrandomized intervention trials, three prospective observational, and one retrospective), and all were conducted in confirmed patients of SARS-CoV-2. Out of the 11 studies, four investigated the effect of CPT on mortality, three on symptom alleviation, five on duration of hospital stay, four on time to discharge, three on the effect on viral clearance, three on the improvement in antibody titers, two on oxygen requirement, and two on adverse events. The pooled estimate for relative risk of death from SARS-CoV-2 was no different after CPT than control (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.10), (p = 0.426) but the relative risk of clinical improvement of symptoms was better after CPT (RR: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.97. 2.70). There was earlier hospital discharge after CPT over control (RR: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.79, 2.80), improved viral clearance (RR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.53), and quicker detection of antibody titer (RR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.53). No difference was observed for adverse effects between CPT and control (RR: 0.92.; 95% CI: 0.63 1.35). CONCLUSION: CPT appears to be a safe and promising treatment in moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2 leading to faster clinical improvement, reduced oxygen requirement, early hospital discharge, and quicker emergence of protective antibodies despite having no mortality benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9438818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94388182022-09-03 Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis Choudhuri, Anirban Hom Duggal, Sakshi Singh, Jotika Biswas, Partha Sarathi J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Systematic Review and Meta-analysis BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) in SARS-CoV-2 is promising but intriguing due to heterogeneity of published studies. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of convalescent plasma use in COVID-19 to identify its safety and efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We comprehensively searched the databases - PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for journal papers published between December 2019 and January 2021 about the use of CPT in SARS-CoV-2, and performed a meta-analysis using random effects models and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Of 1529 records, 11 studies were eligible (five RCTs, two nonrandomized intervention trials, three prospective observational, and one retrospective), and all were conducted in confirmed patients of SARS-CoV-2. Out of the 11 studies, four investigated the effect of CPT on mortality, three on symptom alleviation, five on duration of hospital stay, four on time to discharge, three on the effect on viral clearance, three on the improvement in antibody titers, two on oxygen requirement, and two on adverse events. The pooled estimate for relative risk of death from SARS-CoV-2 was no different after CPT than control (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.10), (p = 0.426) but the relative risk of clinical improvement of symptoms was better after CPT (RR: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.97. 2.70). There was earlier hospital discharge after CPT over control (RR: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.79, 2.80), improved viral clearance (RR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.53), and quicker detection of antibody titer (RR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.53). No difference was observed for adverse effects between CPT and control (RR: 0.92.; 95% CI: 0.63 1.35). CONCLUSION: CPT appears to be a safe and promising treatment in moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2 leading to faster clinical improvement, reduced oxygen requirement, early hospital discharge, and quicker emergence of protective antibodies despite having no mortality benefit. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9438818/ /pubmed/36060163 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_309_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Choudhuri, Anirban Hom
Duggal, Sakshi
Singh, Jotika
Biswas, Partha Sarathi
Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma as a therapy for sars-cov-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060163
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_309_21
work_keys_str_mv AT choudhurianirbanhom safetyandefficacyofconvalescentplasmaasatherapyforsarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duggalsakshi safetyandefficacyofconvalescentplasmaasatherapyforsarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhjotika safetyandefficacyofconvalescentplasmaasatherapyforsarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT biswasparthasarathi safetyandefficacyofconvalescentplasmaasatherapyforsarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis